![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 418
| Re: Mason v. Rock |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Mason v. Rock This is a bit tough...I must say that Rock has the advantage b/c of his return skills. I do hope he improves over the next preseason games.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 58
| Quote:
They don't have enough numbers so some players have to share because we haven't made our cuts yet. Mason looked good last night. But Rock just can contribute more to the team.
__________________ Hail To The Redskins! | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
| Re: Mason v. Rock Mason has to step it up on special teams. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 30
Posts: 8,058
| Re: Mason v. Rock Ive been an advocate for trading Betts since he did well when Portis went down. I like Betts, but we have Rock and Mason. This year, someone will take Mason if we practice squad him.
__________________ Best. Player. Available. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
| Re: Mason v. Rock That's very true. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Mason v. Rock Unless I'm mistaken, practice squad guys are safe from other teams. I know you can't go on the practice squad after your second year though. The ideal time to trade Betts would have been immediately after the 2006 season when he was steamrolling everybody. I wouldn't be opposed to the idea of parting with Betts for a couple of picks, but one of them would have to be a 2nd rounder at minimum. Betts fumbles too much for my tastes. Besides, serviceable spot duty-type running backs grow like weeds in this league. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,471
| Re: Mason v. Rock Mason is fine and all but is it really a big deal if someone scoops him up off the PS? Our RB tandem of Portis and Betts is more than satisfactory and should be that way for 3 or 4 more years. By that time, I would hope that another running back of Mason's skill level would be available either through FA or the draft in the next couple of years. We currently have a solid running game and a solid return game. Take away Rock and we still have a solid running game but now our return game becomes....questionable. I say keep Rock and let Mason sit on the practice squad, even if it means another team knows more about him than we do and grabs him. The Redskins future is not in jeopardy if Mason is not part of the team these next 3 years.
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,105
| Re: Mason v. Rock I haven't been paying close enough attention, but who's the better blocker of the two?
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
| Re: Mason v. Rock Haven't seen much of a blocking roll for Mason, although he ran his ass off last night. But have seen plenty from Rock over time, I think clearly that would be Rock.
__________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Denver Age: 31
Posts: 2,759
| Re: Mason v. Rock From Wikipedia: Each NFL team may keep up to eight members on their "practice squad" in addition to their 53-member main roster. They consist mostly of rookies who were cut in training camps and borderline NFL-caliber players. Both rookies and young veterans are eligible for the practice squad. However, a player cannot participate on the practice squad for more than three seasons. Practice squad players practice alongside regular roster players during the week; however they are not allowed to play in actual games. They can be paid considerably less than active squad players: the minimum salary from 2008 to 2010 is $5,200 per week (2008-2010)[1] for 17 weeks, or $88,400 per season, in comparison to the NFL minimum rookie salary of $285,000. (Some practice squad players are paid considerably more, however: in 2006, the New England Patriots paid third-year player Billy Yates the full $425,000 he would have earned on the active roster.)[2]They are also ineligible for many fringe benefits such as service time, pensions, and the like. They hope to be promoted to the active roster either by their current team, or by another team who is scouting them. They retain free agent status and may sign with any team they wish without compensation to the original team.
__________________ To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 2,178
| Re: Mason v. Rock Quote:
also, There is no way we go into the season with one backup Offensive Tackle.
__________________ You don't get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 6,504
| Re: Mason v. Rock How about Heyer and Alexander?
__________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,957
| Re: Mason v. Rock Quote:
Zorn indicated that Rinehart could "be a factor" this year because of his versatility. He could back up at both guard and tackle positions. "I wish we could keep at one position," Zorn said. "For a rookie to come in and play both positions and do decently, we're pretty excited about that." So with that you have 5 possible tackles dressing up on gameday. 4 Guards and 1.5 Centers which is why you have Crummey on the practice squad. My predictions might not be the most accurate but they do have some substance to them
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President | |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,624
| Re: Mason v. Rock cut betts keep mason? crack pipe - down. rob jackson probably wouldn't last too long on the open market either.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |