Boldin

Jamaican'Skin

Well thank God for you

__________________
The cool kid at the back of the class. Smarty McFly

FRPLG

What would we do without you? We'd ALL make no sense whatsoever then. That's it. Shut down the internet. No sense left.

Slingin Sammy 33

Is it sensible to believe you're the only one who is sensible? A question to ponder....

__________________
...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.

Skinny Tee

why don't you make yourself a homophone-ometer.

__________________

hagams

hehehe,......you said homo potty mouth

__________________
We are always superbowl contenders in March!!! HTTR!!!!!!!!

gibbsisgod

I'm getting the munchies just thinking about it......wait......what were we talking about again?

dblanch66

I think he stays in AZ. He still has 3 years left on his current contract.

__________________
The eyes are the groin of the head

Luxorreb

Sure the Eagles need a WR, but so do half the teams in the NFL. Among the list with the Eagles is also, JETS, Cowboys, Dolphins, Colts, Titans, Broncos, Vikings and Falcons. My guess is Jets or Vikings and possibly Bucs. All seem to have some cash and willing to spend it on NOW! No way he ends up a Redskin. We need other positions before star WR at this point.

__________________
GO SKINS!!! ^21^

RedskinPete

[UOTE=Skinny Tee;465678]why don't you make yourself a homophone-ometer.[/QUOTE]:w oot: Just tooooo Funny!

sandtrapjack

Finally a voice of reason.
Boldin can kick and scream for a trade all he wants. But like dblanch66 said, the fact is Boldin is under contract with Arizona until 2010.

Boldin can kick and scream for a trade all he wants, but unless the Cardinals actually proceed forward and try and trade him, this thread is moot. Chad Johnson "demanded" a trade while still under contract, where is he todaY?

Cardinals will not trade Boldin, no matter how much Boldin wants to be traded.

And whoever said "Trade and sign him for vet minimum" just a reminder that when you trade to acquire a player, you also acquire his CURRENT contract deal. And he is in the middle of a 22 3/4 milion dollar extension now. He is making 4 million a year right now, and wants more.

Ruhskins

This thread would have made sense before draft, but not now. For all of you people that are criticizing the new WRs (see the Devin Thomas thread), the Redskins would have needed to trade for a player like Boldin or Chad Johnson to get a wideout that can contribute right away. Honestly, at this point I don't think the team will and/or can get a veteran of this caliber. If the team were to sign anyone at this point, it would be to fill some back up spots, but that's it.

__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat

I sense an annoyance in the Force

vallin21

My guess is philly. They need a #1 receiver and they get to trade Lito Sheppard which they have wanted to do the whole offseason.

GhettoDogAllStars

Let's imagine that Boldin holds out, and doesn't play, until 2011. Would that be a good situation for AZ? They surely wouldn't be able to trade him for anything of value at that time.

It's all about return on investment, and if Boldin isn't playing, AZ has got to be considering their options -- even if they say they aren't. Just because Boldin is under contract doesn't mean AZ won't trade him. If he's not on the field, I guarantee AZ will look at possible trade scenarios (if they haven't already).

P.S.: the vet min thing was a joke (I think)

__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered.