![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 48
Posts: 2,917
| Re: Questions about the WCO, our strategy and your thoughts In addition, with the WCO spreading a defense horizontally, it can benefit the run game by creating running lanes. My one complaint of the Gibbs style running attack is that it favors a larger back. If we're going to do the WCO whole hog, I'd like to see much more spread the defense out, Alex Gibbs-style zone blocking that sprung Portis for so many long runs in Denver. Our brute force approach to the run will no doubt shorten Portis's career. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
| Re: Questions about the WCO, our strategy and your thoughts Quote:
So when we run the ball we are going to have the O-line loaded with blockers and then when we pass it we're going to have a thin line and be spread out....that may be really transparent. I understood the terminology reply and can see how it wouldn't affect field translation but formation-wise they are vastly different.
__________________ Redskinsly, _________Skinny Tee_________ | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,804
| Re: Questions about the WCO, our strategy and your thoughts Quote:
Not every running play over the past 4 years was in "jumbo" or in two TE formations.
__________________ "It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |