Redskins Add New Punter

CA_Redskins · 10-14-2008, 05:45 PM

Sure, there are different degrees of waste, but a waste none the less.

Still stupid to pick up someone who would have been on the open market after the draft.

Will it really matter? No. It's more of a shot at VC. I'll get over it.

Mattyk · 10-14-2008, 05:53 PM

I find it hard to call a 6th or 7th rounder a waste. Those are the type of picks you can gamble with.

Horton hasn't turned out too bad eh? I think that cancels out any "waste" factor with Brooks.

CA_Redskins · 10-14-2008, 05:58 PM

Gamble on a position other then Punter.

Dirtbag59 · 10-14-2008, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I find it hard to call a 6th or 7th rounder a waste. Those are the type of picks you can gamble with.

Horton hasn't turned out too bad eh? I think that cancels out any "waste" factor with Brooks.

The funny thing about Horton is that I could argue that Horton is playing as well as Brooks was supposed to.

firstdown · 10-14-2008, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Are we putting Brooks on IR or outright releasing him?

Well if read correctlywe signed this new guy to a two year deal so I think that means the door for Brooks. I think there is more to this story then just Brooks performance on the field. didn't he smart off to Shushis (I can't get his name right) maybe he has rubbed others wrong.

RMSkins · 10-14-2008, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CA_Redskins

Gamble on a position other then Punter.

I agree. We could've, most likely, got Brooks as an UDFA. Why not draft someone else in the 6th? As we know all to well with this team draft picks are at a minimum and we have to try to make the most out of every selection. Who knows we could've uncovered another gem like Horton with Brooks selection we'll never know.

SBXVII · 10-14-2008, 06:58 PM

You guys are bitching about a 6th rounder that didn't pan out but not complaining about two second rounders that have hardley seen action. What say you about that?

CA_Redskins · 10-14-2008, 07:02 PM

I say you got the makings of a new thread.

"Rookie Wide Receiver Busts?"

Darrell_Green_28 · 10-14-2008, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSmurfs22

You got to wonder if Derek Frost isn't laughing his butt off.

Brooks will pan out in the long run, but he has a long way to go.

Well dont think Frost is having any better luck either.

Mattyk · 10-14-2008, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darrell_Green_28

Well dont think Frost is having any better luck either.

yeah I don't think Frost is in the position to be laughing at anyone

Lotus · 10-14-2008, 07:21 PM

Yeah, Frost is not laughing...he's about to get cut by Green Bay, too.

Brooks was a waste of a pick, but not a high pick, so the waste was limited.

In VC's defense (a position I don't always occupy), if Brooks had panned out, it would have been great. An excellent punter is a real weapon when it comes to the field position game. It is a shame that Brooks was a gamble lost. And yes, we might have been able to sign him for free without losing a draft choice, but someone else may have scooped up the Ray Guy award winner first.

Mattyk · 10-14-2008, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBXVII

You guys are bitching about a 6th rounder that didn't pan out but not complaining about two second rounders that have hardley seen action. What say you about that?

Thomas is at least seeing some playing time. Kelly has been injured, not much to say there. Neither of those guys are killing us on the field the way Brooks was.

Dirtbag59 · 10-14-2008, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RMSkins

I agree. We could've, most likely, got Brooks as an UDFA. Why not draft someone else in the 6th? As we know all to well with this team draft picks are at a minimum and we have to try to make the most out of every selection. Who knows we could've uncovered another gem like Horton with Brooks selection we'll never know.

This is where Vinny's holy draft board comes into play

But with all due respect to Vinny he did a pretty good job with Colt, Rhinehart, and Horton and I'm more then willing to give the 3 second rounders a little more time.

djnemo65 · 10-14-2008, 07:43 PM

Given how solid this year's draft is looking from top to bottom I don't know how you are going to complain about one guy not working out.

Darrell_Green_28 · 10-14-2008, 08:03 PM

I wonder if Dallas will pick him up and he avgs 50yds. that would really suck

10-14-2008, 05:45 PM	#16
CA_Redskins Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 46	Re: Redskins Add New Punter Sure, there are different degrees of waste, but a waste none the less. Still stupid to pick up someone who would have been on the open market after the draft. Will it really matter? No. It's more of a shot at VC. I'll get over it.

10-14-2008, 05:53 PM	#17
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 73,183	Re: Redskins Add New Punter I find it hard to call a 6th or 7th rounder a waste. Those are the type of picks you can gamble with. Horton hasn't turned out too bad eh? I think that cancels out any "waste" factor with Brooks. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

10-14-2008, 05:58 PM	#18
CA_Redskins Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 46	Re: Redskins Add New Punter Gamble on a position other then Punter.

10-14-2008, 06:58 PM	#22
SBXVII Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,498	Re: Redskins Add New Punter You guys are bitching about a 6th rounder that didn't pan out but not complaining about two second rounders that have hardley seen action. What say you about that?

10-14-2008, 07:02 PM	#23
CA_Redskins Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: San Diego Posts: 46	Re: Redskins Add New Punter I say you got the makings of a new thread. "Rookie Wide Receiver Busts?"

10-14-2008, 07:21 PM	#26
Lotus Mann Up HOF! Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 8,947	Re: Redskins Add New Punter Yeah, Frost is not laughing...he's about to get cut by Green Bay, too. Brooks was a waste of a pick, but not a high pick, so the waste was limited. In VC's defense (a position I don't always occupy), if Brooks had panned out, it would have been great. An excellent punter is a real weapon when it comes to the field position game. It is a shame that Brooks was a gamble lost. And yes, we might have been able to sign him for free without losing a draft choice, but someone else may have scooped up the Ray Guy award winner first.

10-14-2008, 07:43 PM	#29
djnemo65 Playmaker Join Date: May 2004 Location: MA Age: 32 Posts: 2,836	Re: Redskins Add New Punter Given how solid this year's draft is looking from top to bottom I don't know how you are going to complain about one guy not working out.

10-14-2008, 08:03 PM	#30
Darrell_Green_28 The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Age: 44 Posts: 1,949	Re: Redskins Add New Punter I wonder if Dallas will pick him up and he avgs 50yds. that would really suck __________________ Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Redskins Add New Punter

Redskins Locker Room