Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Offensive Report Card (Bucs game)

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: Grade the offense
A 0 0%
B 19 61.29%
C 11 35.48%
D 1 3.23%
F 0 0%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2004, 03:07 PM   #16
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,439
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...len&id=1880301

well these ppl share my opinion.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-13-2004, 03:08 PM   #17
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,439
lets see..the only touchdown we had was off of that run, we lose the game maybe if we dont get that run. id say he did alright
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 03:19 PM   #18
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
After one game and Lenny P is convinced we're going to be a team that 'doesn't throw effectively' and also called it a 'fairly rudimentary offense'.

This jerk just can't help himself, he is addicted to digging on the Skins. He's pathetic.
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 03:24 PM   #19
LRT
Special Teams
 
LRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 173
I give the offense a B. As a lot of people have pointed out, there are a number of things that need to be improved and I did think about giving it a C. However, it is the first game of the year, the o-line gave up no sacks and, when it really counted, they ate up clock almost like an old-fashioned Riggo drill. If this were November, it'd be a C, but in September I'll give it B.
LRT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 03:39 PM   #20
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 51
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C
These ppl is Len Pasquerilla and he is a real believable person when it comes to the Redskins
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 04:56 PM   #21
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,515
I had to give them a 'C' just because the scoring was quite low and a couple problems with Center and GQ exchange. Other than that, they did everything they needed to do..especially controlling the clock. If the Skins can start putting up at least 3 TDs a game and Iron out a few wrinkles, they should be a grade 'A' offense in no time.
skinsguy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 06:44 PM   #22
Special Teams
 
bedlamVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
This was the bucs and they are still a very good defensive team regardless of what people say . Yet we allowed no sacks and only had one turn over . The offence wasn't firing but it needs to get some belief in itself one thing I rember people saying in the offseason is the Gibbs passing game is a trust based system, throwing the ball to where the reciver is going to be not where they are, and that will need time to gel. Alot of offences use the timing systems but timing systms need time to work. We are still a 5-11 team untill someone steps up at tells us otherwise
bedlamVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 12:04 AM   #23
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by bedlamVR
We are still a 5-11 team untill someone steps up at tells us otherwise
Ok I'll be the one to break the news, we're actually a 1-0 team

Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 12:44 AM   #24
Playmaker
 
BleedBurgundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,469
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]'fairly rudimentary offense'.
QUOTE]


It is a fairly rudimentary offense, it's not rocket science. The difference is that Gibbs gets his players to buy into and execute this rudimentary offense to perfection. It's not flashy, (although I was fuckin' thrilled when I saw the counter tre) it's good, old fashioned football brought to us by a hall of fame coach. Any jackass can draw up complicated schemes, but they tend to fall apart when shit hits the fan. A great game day coach like Gibbs brings a simplistic (yet beautiful) gameplan that can be executed against any team. Every Sunday we will run the ball. When the defense brings extra personnel in to stop Portis, that's when we go for the deep ball. Pick your poison. It's not rocket science, it's fundamentals.
BleedBurgundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 01:26 AM   #25
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 45
Posts: 4,587
One: It will take time to get all the wrinkles into this offense. Gibbs has a huge playbook, and he barely cracked it yesterday. He needs to lay down that base coat of smash mouth running and pass protection first. Then he'll add the details.

Two: Why take a risk against a Monty Kiffin D? And when you've got a Williams D on your side? Get the W and set the tone!

Three: Pasta ass doesn't want to have to say something good so he calls it a "fairly rudimentary offense." What a load of crap. Do you really think that's all we've got, you bloated bowl of BS? Let's hope the rest of the league believes that and stacks the run. Gee, I wonder if Joe Gibbs has any pass plays? Gee, I wonder if he knows how to trick defenses with shifts and play action? This isn't Marty-ball. Gibbs is a bonafide offensive genius. But he knows better than to have his team beat themselves. One step at a time. Fairly rudimentary, my ass.

Big C, no offense, but you gotta check your sources here. See the thread where Wilbon takes Pasta to task. This is another sportswriter talking, not some hothead like myself on a message board.
Wilbon vs. Pasta (Pasta Belly)
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 01:36 AM   #26
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,627
Pasquarelli clearly has some sort of personal agenda against the Redskins, but he's right when he said that Thrash's block was key on the Portis run and I think that's all that Big C was trying to point out
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 01:55 AM   #27
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 45
Posts: 4,587
Whoa! My Bad, Big C!!! I just caught the one where you say "these ppl share my opinion." Thrash defiently threw a nice block threre, and had some good play on punt coverage.

Sorry, man. Seeing anything even like a pro-pasta post gets me going! So, to all: take my crit of Pasta, not of the Big C.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 08:04 AM   #28
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
I don't have a problem with someone saying the offense is rudimentary, but coming from Lenny P and knowing his agenda you can pretty much bet on the fact that's his little way of taking yet another jab at the Redskins.

The offense is rudimentary in the way it focuses on the basic fundamentals, but when you also look at the shifts, the pulling lineman and h-backs and the blocking schemes, I think calling it rudimentary is glossing over the beauty of it.
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 09:29 AM   #29
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 51
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by smootsmack
Pasquarelli clearly has some sort of personal agenda against the Redskins, but he's right when he said that Thrash's block was key on the Portis run and I think that's all that Big C was trying to point out

He did have the key blocks on that one run, no doubt. But where was he the rest of the game which was my point. Say the quote below that Big C said which is what I disagree with. He then refers to Pasquirella as how Thrash played. You know that is a big no no around this site. Len P is not a authority on the skins.

Big C Quote "Did you not see james thrash blocking?? they even had an article on espn praising thrash for helping open holes."

The plantiff rests!!
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 10:47 AM   #30
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,259
everyone in a gibbs offense blocks... i saw thrash coles and gardner all throwing down.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31149 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25