|
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Grade the special teams | |||
| A |     | 0 | 0% |
| B |    | 1 | 4.00% |
| C |    | 16 | 64.00% |
| D |    | 8 | 32.00% |
| F |    | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-13-2004, 02:51 PM
| #16 |
| Special Teams  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Dallas Age: 32
Posts: 461
| C special teams did win it for us guys. and the return game was good enough for us to win as well. needs alot of improvment but it was enough to win that game. hall gave us a good game. remember how we scored 75% of that game. |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
09-13-2004, 03:37 PM
| #17 |
| Special Teams   Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 47
Posts: 171
| I gave them a C on teams solely on the basis on the weak kick coverage. But, I know Coach Gibbs and his staff will work on that. I expect it to improve. |
|
| |
|
09-13-2004, 03:51 PM
| #18 |
| The Starter  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: 36.28 x 76.22 Age: 61
Posts: 1,791
| If! If I could quantify via a number, it would be a C-, or just under 2.0! Poor coverage amounts to a score which equals a lower grade. All parts of ST's have to work. KO's, Punts, KO returns, Opponnent KO returns, Punt coverages, EP's, FG's. A C-, combined with an A- on "D", and a B+ on "O", equals = W (Win! Not Withdrawal) Bottom Line Grade: "W"!
__________________ '37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
