Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Consolation....7 turnovers and lose by 6

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2004, 06:50 PM   #16
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
One thing I did last year,that I'm not sure I want to do this year. That's give up on the starting QB after one game. I know Brunell didn't make the throws but some of the play calling wasn't the best against this defense. A short screen pass to Portis, Sellers or Betts could gain a lot of yards against the Giants. After the Giants stuffed our run on a couple of plays, we seemed to panic on offense and call pass plays into a lot of traffic. One after another. If think Betts needs to get more touches on the ball. What could have led to Portis's fumble is fatigue. I mean he was in the backfield almost 90% of the time. Come on, let's mix it up on play calling!
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-19-2004, 06:53 PM   #17
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
We scored on a fake handoff and a short pass. Did anyone see Brunell roll out to his right and throw a potential INT? If he's a lefty, why is he rolling out to his right?
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 07:49 PM   #18
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 28
Posts: 7,499
Oh I caught that too, Sunra. I agree 100%. Now I'm not gonna start questioning Joe Gibbs whatsoever, but I thought that was very weird. I mean that rollout play has been awsome for us this season so far. Rarley has the Quarterback not had alot of time, but when Brunell rolled out to the right, he just looked very uncomfortable. Having to switch your whole body around takes a second or so and really wastes some time.
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 07:51 PM   #19
King of the Cage
 
Jamaican'Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 27
Posts: 2,336
I'm very surprised that we were in it with 7 turnovers
__________________
Back like a spinal tap
Jamaican'Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 07:54 PM   #20
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,639
It's not uncommon for QB's to roll to their opposite side. Should the QB only roll to one side all the time?? That would be a little predictable don't ya think?
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 07:58 PM   #21
The Starter
 
Bozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ina, house
Age: 34
Posts: 1,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
It's not uncommon for QB's to roll to their opposite side. Should the QB only roll to one side all the time?? That would be a little predictable don't ya think?
LOL I just got the image of a QB rolling to both sides at the same time. :cheeky-sm
Bozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 08:21 PM   #22
Special Teams
 
la73hof's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Age: 41
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozzy
LOL I just got the image of a QB rolling to both sides at the same time. :cheeky-sm
Heck, Matty, our defense held Jeff Garcia to a passer rating of 0.0 and we only won by 7 points
__________________
"I'll go on the record that i am a LA fan"--redsk1

Thanks!
la73hof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 08:50 PM   #23
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Brunell didn't roll out to either side after that possession. I think we need a QB with better footwork. The (dash play) When Joe Theismann would roll straight back and dash to the left or dash to the right and throw the pass. Gibbs doesn't favor the shotgun, but he should with these QB's.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 09:03 PM   #24
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,247
ramsey isn't done, he had a bad day, but even with 3 ints, his mistakes didn't lead to points, brunell gave up turn overs that made points...

brunell has a serious problem too (besides HIS turn overs), he can't throw down the field accurately... that's caused problems for us in both games... no long passes...
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 09:12 PM   #25
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,612
Even if Ramsey's turnovers didn't lead to points, they kept us from scoring points and that's what we needed

I think I have the solution really. Who's been struggling at receiver? Rod Gardner. And who had two completions for two touchdowns with a passer rating of 149 last year? That's right. Rod Gardner!

So clearly the answer is to keep Rod in the lineup but move him to QB...maybe we can re-sign Kevin Lockett to back him up

__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.23652 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25