![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #91 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #92 |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Bridges is better than at least 3 of the O-lineman on our roster. All I'm saying.
__________________ Insert witty signature here |
| | |
| | #93 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms [quote=GMScud;639997]Bridges is better than at least 3 of the O-lineman on our roster. All I'm saying.[/quot} Really? Which three? Because our offensive line has given up considerably less sacks over the past four or five weeks. |
| | |
| | #94 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms [quote=12thMan;640001] Quote:
Lol. Heyer - who still doesn't know the snap count. Montgomery. Batiste. Reinhart. Paul Fainaka. William Robinson. I like Mike Williams and think there may be some upside but I think you could even say that Bridges is better than him. | |
| | |
| | #95 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Ontario,Ca Age: 39
Posts: 274
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms |
| | |
| | #96 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms I wish we had kept Bridges myself, but the coaching staff felt guys like Batisted and Heyer had more long-term upside. Not a move I agree with. Bridges is a proven starting G/T. He's had more good games than bad in his career and more good than Heyer. N
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #97 |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Did I say anywhere that he's "great?" Not even close. I just think he's considerably better than at least 3 (probably more) of the O-lineman currently on our roster.
__________________ Insert witty signature here |
| | |
| | #98 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Quote:
I don't think any of these guys are great. I think Bridges is average and all of the guys that I listed are below average and a few should not be in the league. My main point is that in our weakest link on the team, you cannot afford to toss aside a guy who has started 80 games in the league for guys who at best belong on a practice squad. | |
| | |
| | #99 | |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,021
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Quote:
I'm willing to give our FO credit where credit is actually do. Good decisions: *Drafting the trio of Malcom, Devin and Fred last season. Seemed weird at the time but it was good, good stuff. *Signing Al. *Signing Hall. Bad decisions: Everything else, literally. But the decision-making on the OL specifically should be enough to get the FO "fired" in most franchises. What a sh*tshow. Like others have said Heyer should be practice team fodder.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. | |
| | |
| | #100 |
| The Starter ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 1,937
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms I was shocked when they cut him. They said it was his poor play, but I saw alot of other players playing alot worse. |
| | |
| | #101 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 36
Posts: 7,784
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Im still thinking we need at least 2 new starters on the Oline next year...one tackle and RG. I think Heyer and Levi Jones battle it out for the other Tackle position. Mike Williams is good depth as well as Reinhart...dont really think they are starters in this league...cutting Bridges was a mistake by the team and would have been substantial help what we faced early in the season, but that is what we do here, so really no surprise...
__________________ Ready for the Draft. |
| | |
| | #102 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Quote:
Would I like to see a young Steve Hutchinson type in his place? Of course, but if they don't get a guard & plan to use MW in the meantime, I think that would be alright. | |
| | |
| | #103 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,232
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms With the state of our line the long-term upside decision was retarded. We didn't need long term upside. We neeed guys who play football now. |
| | |
| | #104 |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,905
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms I am not sure on Bridges. I saw him last night getting into the face of Hightower after he fumbled. It didn't look like a "positive" chewing out, but a very aggressive one. Reminded me of his past issues. Not really saying it is the only factor, but something about that interaction looked way off to me. So I wonder if there was more than just ability at issue when he was here. On the other hand, he certainly has ability, and it's a fair question about cutting him, when our OL was shaky to begin with. |
| | |
| | #105 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |