Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2009, 04:30 AM   #61
Camp Scrub
 
freddavisbro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 70
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

fred davis should be in there boyyyy redskin fans have no clue but in due timeeee
freddavisbro86 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-23-2009, 07:19 AM   #62
Camp Scrub
 
kenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

I don't know exactly whom Cooley should replace, but i do known one thing for sure..and that is..COoLEY should definitely stay on the list! He's a great player man!
__________________
Redskins Tickets
Washington Redskins Tickets are available @ Ticket Luck
kenny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 01:33 PM   #63
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,939
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

This is one guys opinion. I don't care what Faulk thinks.
Cooley is a great player. I really like him, but some folks on this sight think Cooley's shit doesn't stink. He is a top 5 or top 7 TE in the NFL. Until the QB inconsistency's with the Redskins gets resolved, it will be hard for him to move up in the Top 5.

Last edited by Defensewins; 07-23-2009 at 03:36 PM.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 03:20 PM   #64
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,019
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddavisbro86 View Post
fred davis should be in there boyyyy redskin fans have no clue but in due timeeee
You should know better than I. I look forward to your saying, "I told you so."
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:14 PM   #65
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
This is one guys opinion. I don't care what Faulk thinks.
Cooley is a great player. I really like him, but some folks on this sight think Cooley's shit doesn't stink. He is a top 5 or top 7 TE in the NFL. Until the QB inconsistency's with the Redskins gets resolved, it will be hard for him to move up in the Top 5.
How dare you say that. Cooley's shit smells like freshly cut lilacs.

J/K... I hear you. Some people need to get a hold of themselves with Cooley.

If Cooley would get in the endzone more he'd be firmly in the top five.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:19 PM   #66
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,519
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
How dare you say that. Cooley's shit smells like freshly cut lilacs.

J/K... I hear you. Some people need to get a hold of themselves with Cooley.

If Cooley would get in the endzone more he'd be firmly in the top five.
agreed. but how much of that is his fault? the offensive lines fault? Campbell's fault? the play calling?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:22 PM   #67
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,494
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
This is one guys opinion. I don't care what Faulk thinks.
Cooley is a great player. I really like him, but some folks on this sight think Cooley's shit doesn't stink. He is a top 5 or top 7 TE in the NFL. Until the QB inconsistency's with the Redskins gets resolved, it will be hard for him to move up in the Top 5.
So he is top 5 or not??

Despite the QB play the guy put up career highs in catches and yards last year.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:23 PM   #68
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,494
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
How dare you say that. Cooley's shit smells like freshly cut lilacs.

J/K... I hear you. Some people need to get a hold of themselves with Cooley.

If Cooley would get in the endzone more he'd be firmly in the top five.
Jeez one down year with TDs and the guy is out of the top 5 at his position??

It's not his fault he wasn't targeted much in the redzone. That's on Zorn.

He's proven in the past he's a solid TD guy. Before last year he never had less than 6 in any single year.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:25 PM   #69
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,880
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

I forget which interview it was, but Cooley said that Zorn promised him at least 6 TD's this year. That alone would be a boost to our ppg stat.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:29 PM   #70
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,494
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I forget which interview it was, but Cooley said that Zorn promised him at least 6 TD's this year. That alone would be a boost to our ppg stat.
At the least the emphasis needs to be there on getting him the ball in the redzone. How a guy that was a 6-8 TD per year guy drops to 1 is puzzling at best.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 05:27 PM   #71
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,019
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
At the least the emphasis needs to be there on getting him the ball in the redzone. How a guy that was a 6-8 TD per year guy drops to 1 is puzzling at best.
I totally agree. It is puzzling and Zorn bears some responsibility. IMO some of it was just (bad) luck, too. I expect that he will have more td's this year simply from the law of averages' stabilizing of things.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 09:29 PM   #72
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,939
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
So he is top 5 or not??

Despite the QB play the guy put up career highs in catches and yards last year.
Yes he is not...no he is...ummm...J/k

Depends on who you ask.
The TD number has become overly important in peoples minds when they rank offensive skill position players. Just like sacks now dominates as a measure for defensive lineman and linebackers.
This reminds of Gerald Riggs in 1991-92 season when he was our short yardage/goal line back. Earnie Byner would bust his ass and absorb all the punishment in getting us to the 1 or 2 yard line. Then in waltzes Riggs, they hand the ball and he would fall over the goal line. Riggs had 11 TD's for the season, but he only rushed 248 yards. Yet Byner had 1048 yards rushing and had only 5 TD's. Stats can't measure toughness, run blocking, route running, shedding blocks or hustle.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 10:20 PM   #73
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Faulk's top 5 TE'S NO COOLEY!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Jeez one down year with TDs and the guy is out of the top 5 at his position??

It's not his fault he wasn't targeted much in the redzone. That's on Zorn.

He's proven in the past he's a solid TD guy. Before last year he never had less than 6 in any single year.
Well if we're rating the tight ends on a yearly basis, then yeah he could fall out of the top five if he doesn't present much of a scoring threat compared to the other tight ends.

Sure, offensive scheming is a part of it, but just because he's not in some schmuck's Top Five doesn't mean he isn't a good tight end. To me, he's a good tight end. Not great, not exactly a game changer. But yes, he's good.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29769 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25