Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Campbell's numbers dont lie

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2009, 01:54 PM   #676
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,967
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalisto2010 View Post
While I'm sure those adjustments helped, the x-factor was the 106.4 passer rating. His play completely re-energized our team.
His play, o line changes, improved running game, Smoot and Springs playing lighs out, the emotions running through the team, Collins' knowledge of the offense, etc.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-13-2009, 02:01 PM   #677
The Starter
 
MonkFan4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 1,840
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Collins would be a sitting duck right now with our o-line...at least JC is a running duck.
He just may but I doubt we would've scored 9 points against the Rams. I doubt that the games would be as close against lesser competition. Before Samuels and Thomas went down there was the exact same production from the offense that we've seen through the 2 systems that Campbell has played under since being a starter here. His stats look good by the time the game is over but there aren't many points scored. Everyone needs to come to the realization that Danny was right about him. He believed in Jason and when he lost his faith in him he lost it. I wish JC well in his future endeavors but I doubt he'll be the stud that people think Washington is keeping him from becoming.
__________________
Catch me on YouTube !

http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5

The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today"
MonkFan4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:09 PM   #678
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,342
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalisto2010 View Post
While I'm sure those adjustments helped, the x-factor was the 106.4 passer rating. His play completely re-energized our team.
Collins looked good against Seattle in the playoffs, right? The guy is a career backup for a reason, game manager only, zero upside. What would be the point of putting him in now? Maybe by effective game management he could account for 1 win, maybe 2. That leaves us at 6-10 or 7-9, right where we want to be to rebuild ???? He is extremely slow with a weak arm.

Putting Collins in completely stops the evaluation of JC and if JC isn't the guy doesn't allow us to look at Woodson.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:28 PM   #679
Registered User
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 50
Posts: 15,818
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
His play, o line changes, improved running game, Smoot and Springs playing lighs out, the emotions running through the team, Collins' knowledge of the offense, etc.
Whats playing lighs out?
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:50 PM   #680
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,967
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Whats playing lighs out?
aka super smart aka fighting their guts out

The last 4 games of 2007 Springs had something like 15 tackles, 10 passes defended and 4 interceptions

Smoot didn't have quite the stats but he made some huge tackles as I recall
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:53 PM   #681
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,527
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Chase Daniels is a FA
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 03:56 PM   #682
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Chase Daniels is a FA
Never heard of anyone named Chase Daniels.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 03:58 PM   #683
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Collins would be a sitting duck right now with our o-line...at least JC is a running duck.
Exactly. People calling for Collins are also conveniently forgetting that he played in the Saunders system for a decade and knew the plays inside and out. He could have thrown those balls with his eyes closed.

We no longer run that offense.

His arm looked incredibly weak in the preseason too.

TC could never duplicate that stretch of games again.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 04:03 PM   #684
Camp Scrub
 
DAVID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 20
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Jason sucks, it's been like that for past years!
DAVID is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 11:20 AM   #685
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

UPDATED stats/assessment...yep, I said I'd keep doing it!

Cutler:
WK 6 - 24/43 (62.8%), 300 yds, 2 TD, 2 INT, 79.6 rating, 34 rush yds
TOTAL: 110/172 (64.0%), 1,201 yds, 10 TD, 7 INT, 86.9 rating, 56 rush yds

Sanchez:
WK 6 - 10/29 (34.5%), 119 yds, 0 TD, 5 INT, 8.3 rating, 6 rush yds
TOTAL: 85/163 (52.1%), 1,035 yds, 5 TD, 10 INT, 56.7 rating, 50 rush yds

Campbell:
WK 6 (half) - 9/16 (56.3%), 89 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT, 46.1 rating, 6 rush yds
TOTAL: 107/163 (65.6%), 1,197 yds, 6 TD, 6 INT, 84.3 rating, 95 rush yds


Ranks:
Comp. % = Campbell, Cutler, Sanchez
Yds = Cutler (1,201) Campbell (1,197), Sanchez (1,035)
TDs = Cutler (10), Campbell (6), Sanchez (5)
INTs (fewest) = Campbell (6), Cutler (7), Sanchez (10)
QB rating = Cutler (86.9), Campbell (84.3), Sanchez (56.7)
Rush yds = Campbell (95), Cutler (56), Sanchez(50)






Anyone still want Sanchez?

Cutler is beginning to look slightly better than Campbell in yards and TDs, but really, statistically there is not much of a difference and Jason still leads in a few categories. Of course, Cutler has played 2 more quarters than Campbell, but the separation is not drastic in those few categories. Also, Campbell still proves to be the most efficient (completion %), least turnover-prone and still the best runner when in trouble by far.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 11:46 AM   #686
Special Teams
 
Green1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Those of you who called for Todd Collins do you really think he played better that JC vs the chiefs?
Green1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 11:55 AM   #687
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green1 View Post
Those of you who called for Todd Collins do you really think he played better that JC vs the chiefs?
Yeah, those people are being proven to be looney too...like the Sanchez lovers.

Cutler's numbers are so minimally-better than Campbell's that it's obvious that even if he were on the Redskins this season, he's be no better or worse than Campbell.

With Vinny in charge of building our O-line and Zorn calling plays (up until now)...Campbell was our best-bet for this season.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:13 PM   #688
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 37
Posts: 2,906
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

That image of Campbell sitting on the bench doesn't lie either.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood.
Trample the Elderly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:18 PM   #689
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 27
Posts: 8,606
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly View Post
That image of Campbell sitting on the bench doesn't lie either.
lol that doesnt really mean he should've been benched. It was a desperate move by Zorn to try to salvage his job. Zorn failed with the move, as TC sucks.

I dont think most coaches would have made that move as it is obvious JC is epically better than all other options the SKins have (TC).
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 12:19 PM   #690
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly View Post
That image of Campbell sitting on the bench doesn't lie either.
So you support Zorn's decisions? Good for you.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.63692 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25