Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Campbell's numbers dont lie

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2009, 06:07 PM   #826
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,962
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin View Post
We're gonna rally up and kick off in that Philly A$$!!!!!!!! Lets have a little positive attitude!!! Im tired of all this negativity!!! We are supposed to lose!!! But what if we win?? Itl be a shocker!! And thats why they play the game!!! Cant wait! Lets do this!! COme on Defense----Defense----Defense!!! Capital punish!! Make the feathers fly!! I still think Lewis will pull out some old Tecmo Bowl plays!!!
That's what's up!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-26-2009, 06:35 PM   #827
The Starter
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,077
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
I agree with Casserly that Campbell is a square peg being forced into a round hole with the change to a WCO under Zorn. I've wondered how Campbell would have continued to progress in the Al Saunders system, for which his skills seem a much better fit. Joe Flacco is looking pretty damn good in that system with Cam Cameron and Saunders coaching him up.
Didn't he run "a version" of the West Coast offense in College? Seemed to do well enough there.

Maybe he's just confused because he's been in six different systems since he's been a pro...

There are a myriad of reasons the Redskins stink right now. Campbell may not be playing perfectly, but he's hardly the main reason for the 2-4 record.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 06:50 PM   #828
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
hater is just as dumb as kool aid drinker
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 06:52 PM   #829
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,876
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

I hope everyone watched the BANG cartoon - flawed execution - it is hilarious!
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 06:53 PM   #830
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Wow, I had NO IDEA Campbell was the person calling the stretch-left plays inside the 10 and running the ball in passing situations. I bet he's also the reason we're not trying fade routes to our tall WRs too!

Golly gee willikers...thanks for helping us understand this complipl...complloc...this hard football stuff! Glad someone here has fancy book-learnin'!


I'll update the stats again after the MNF game. Cutler laid another 3-interception rotten egg in the Bears' 45-10 beatdown by the Bengals and Sanchez was again mediocre as the Jets used the running game to the tune of 316 rushing yards to beat the Raiders.
lol u mad

contrary to popular belief you don't have to score TD's just inside of the red zone... a few of these big passes that he's missing or never seeing could easily get us a score in the hands of thomas, kelly, etc
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 07:17 PM   #831
Camp Scrub
 
redskinsgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dc area
Posts: 78
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
Didn't he run "a version" of the West Coast offense in College? Seemed to do well enough there.

Maybe he's just confused because he's been in six different systems since he's been a pro...

There are a myriad of reasons the Redskins stink right now. Campbell may not be playing perfectly, but he's hardly the main reason for the 2-4 record.
According to his Auburn's coach they altered the West Coast to suit JC's strengths

Redskins' Campbell in tough spot following coaching shakeup

"Borges isn't buying that Campbell can't run the scheme because the West Coast system is what he ran at Auburn when Campbell blossomed. However, Borges said he tweaked the offense to take advantage of the powerful run game and Campbell's big arm. So, instead of dinking and dunking horizontally and relying on timing and receivers to make yards after the reception, Borges implemented more play-action and vertical passing.

"As much as we threw that underneath stuff, we could get it downfield," Borges said. "He could make all the throws; short, intermediate, deep. When he played in 2004, he played lights out. This kid threw almost 70 percent of his passes complete. What's phenomenal about it, his completions were over 10 yards an attempt. That's just not done. He's accurate. Matt Leinart won the Heisman at a 66 percent completion rate with a lower yards-per-catch."
redskinsgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 07:38 PM   #832
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 36
Posts: 764
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Wow at this point people are still defending Campbell? Amazing.
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 08:02 PM   #833
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

First off, lets count up his dumb ass decisions during games. Then lets look at the amount of times hes fumbled. Now, the interceptions, and while we are at it, how many fucking times does he have to bitch out and throw the fucking ball to the redskin fans in the stands??? Ya, our fans can catch better than Kelly and Randel El, but its not a completion.

Ok, now for this overblown statistic, which anyone who has actually watched the games this year can attest to. I guarantee that at least 35% of JC's passes are checkdowns, because he doesn't want to throw the ball downfield.......Checkdown, Checkdown, Checkdown, Checkdown.........JC is nothing more than an above average career backup, and its time these idiots running the team recognize this and start moving in another direction so our team can take a step towards achieving greatness, cause I can tell you right now, with JC at the helm, do not expect playoffs, and if you ever expect him to win a super bowl, you are just plain smoking some fuckin crack.

Oh, I forgot.......Why don't I ever see JC yelling at his team???? Getting pumped up????Getting his team motivated?????? Being a leader?????

I'll tell you why, cause he is a timid little pussified boy who cant take charge of a team, and you cant be timid in the NFL and be a leader. Bottom line.
Mechanix544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 08:25 PM   #834
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
Didn't he run "a version" of the West Coast offense in College? Seemed to do well enough there.

Maybe he's just confused because he's been in six different systems since he's been a pro...

There are a myriad of reasons the Redskins stink right now. Campbell may not be playing perfectly, but he's hardly the main reason for the 2-4 record.
In college players get 10 yards open, defensive schemes aren't typically as advanced, etc
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 08:29 PM   #835
The Starter
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,077
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerohero View Post
Wow at this point people are still defending Campbell? Amazing.
Not necessarily defending him, but I'm not going to agree with those that think he is the reason why this team is 2-4 though.

Right now this whole organization is a joke, and the problems are much greater than the starting quarterback.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:12 PM   #836
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 3,143
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
Not necessarily defending him, but I'm not going to agree with those that think he is the reason why this team is 2-4 though.

Right now this whole organization is a joke, and the problems are much greater than the starting quarterback.
I'm done. I've been a Campbell apologist for the last 2 years. He lost me on the check down when he had Moss for a TD on the pump and go. Casserly's right. Campbell leaves huge plays on the field by checking down too early. Even worse, he has reverted to the fumbling turnover machine that he was two years ago. The protection has been adequate tonight. There have been plays to be made. I'm FINALLY willing to admit that Campbell probably never had "it".
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:43 AM   #837
Special Teams
 
Green1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
I'm done. I've been a Campbell apologist for the last 2 years. He lost me on the check down when he had Moss for a TD on the pump and go. Casserly's right. Campbell leaves huge plays on the field by checking down too early. Even worse, he has reverted to the fumbling turnover machine that he was two years ago. The protection has been adequate tonight. There have been plays to be made. I'm FINALLY willing to admit that Campbell probably never had "it".
McNabb left the same play on the field and he has been in the same offense for years. 6 sacks, no running still, and ARE turnover but JC is to blame.
Green1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:46 AM   #838
The Starter
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,659
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green1 View Post
McNabb left the same play on the field and he has been in the same offense for years. 6 sacks, no running still, and ARE turnover but JC is to blame.
JC IS TO BLAME. Steve Young on ESPN and the other analysts puts the focus on his bad game.
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:50 AM   #839
Special Teams
 
Green1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath View Post
JC IS TO BLAME. Steve Young on ESPN and the other analysts puts the focus on his bad game.
No running game. The Entire Oline needs replacing. So what is the answer T. Collins don't make me laugh
Green1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:52 AM   #840
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,994
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath View Post
JC IS TO BLAME. Steve Young on ESPN and the other analysts puts the focus on his bad game.
Steve Young was trying to blame the tip at the line INT on Campbell. Unfortunately, he couldn't think of a word long enough to defend that position.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.35086 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25