![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 42
Posts: 752
| Redskins Grades Week 6
__________________ DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 6,505
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Z- if there's such a thing.
__________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Three Chopt Virginia Age: 35
Posts: 2,906
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Defense gets a B+ Offense gets a DNF. Did not finish. By Zorn!
__________________ A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: 757
Posts: 685
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 defense is the only one that deserves to even be considered for a grade because the rest was absent and you cant get a grade if your no there. so i place a call to dan and ask why his offense and special teams were absent today. so the d gets a B |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 573
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 PLEASE......F...for the entire team.
__________________ #21 Will always be missed. Gone but not forgotten |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Washington DC Age: 26
Posts: 9,810
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Offense gets a D-. The run by Portis is the only saving grace for the offense Defense B+ Special Teams C- due to that stupid blocked kick Coaching D+
__________________ Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I'm a chick, damnit. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 8,377
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Grades? Bad enough that a Toga party should be in order! DOUBLE-SECRET probation
__________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... Win! Always win! By fair means or foul, by soft words and hard deeds... by treachery, by cunning, by malpractice... but always win--Edward Teach |
| | |
| | #8 |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,923
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 F- Defense C (Our great defense can't do two things, either of which could help win games: Shutout an equally inept offense, and score defensive points.) Sometimes the D has to put a team on its shoulder, ours doesn't. They are ok, but they are not elite. Baltimore D of old is elite, Pitt D of last year was elite. Ours just does enough - if we had any offense worth mentioning. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| The Starter Join Date: May 2009 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Our front 7 did very good, the back 4 let us down in too many key situations. Landry never plays the ball and is too concerned with trying to make the JACKED UP highlights. The Offense was hard to watch, 2 big plays vs the worst defense in the league.
__________________ But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 F M L ****.. my.. life |
| | |
| | #11 |
| The Starter Join Date: May 2009 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Mr. Irrelevant, a player no longer worthy of his nickname. The Kansas City Chiefs are winless no more. Neither is coach Todd Haley, who earned victory No. 1 with an assist from the last player taken in this year's draft. Now im really sad. the hits just keep on comin
__________________ But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,956
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Redskins Week 6 gradeDefense B) Positives: 1.Pressured QB 2.Points Allowed 12 3.On the field most of the game but played inspired. Negatives: 1.No forced turnovers 2.Allowed to many yards on the ground (Johnson 83 yards) 3.DB's poor tackling and to much cushion on WR. Offense -![]() Positives: 1.Portis 79 yard run Negatives: 1.Scored 6 points 2.No TD in the Red Zone 3.Poor on 3rd downs 4.Turned ball over and gave up a safety 5.Poor play calling in the red Zone after Portis 79 yard run. 6.Portis 79 yard run should have been a TD but Sellers falls and Portis should have cut inside. 7. Both QB's played poor. 8.O-Line poor run blocking. Special Teams:C Positives: 1.FG team scored only game points(6) 2.Coverage teams played well Negatives: ![]() 1.Punt Blocked 2.Return teams lack big plays ( Rock/ARE) need to get replaced. 3.Costly penalties during returns. Coaching:C Defense:B Positives: 1.Agressive play calling 2. Orakpo rushed more. 3.Played Wilson and Jarmon Negative: 1.Rogers play has declined( maybe time to trade or replace him) 2.DB's play to soft on coverages. ( D.Bowie slants all day) Offense:F ![]() Postives: 1.None
__________________ RGIII the franchise QB we have been waiting for since Mark Rypien leads us to a SuperBowl win over the Bills. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 20
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Mattyk72 and all skins fans predicted win against KC, wake up !!!!! |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| The Bluths ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,105
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Quote:
http://www.thewarpath.net/609151-post6.html (What do you expect this Sunday, Skins vs. KC)
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,739
| Re: Redskins Grades Week 6 Quote:
Either way get it straight, I predicted a loss. Call out FAIL. Thanks for playing. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |