Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


The 3-4

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2004, 01:00 AM   #1
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
The 3-4

I'm quite surprised by the relative lack movement on the dline. I guess they feel that Washington, unlike Armstead, brought more outside speed and that he will be like a cheaper pass-rushing DE. But, I'm somewhat surprised that they've pretty much ruled out the 3-4.

You Warpathers who were around before the start of last season may recall that I advocated using the 3-4 for the 03' season. Whether the 3-4 was right last season or not, I think it's worth considering for the upcoming season.

Defenses like the Pats, Ravens, Steelers, and some other team I can't think of used the 3-4 and I think our LB corps is better than theirs (assuming we add Favors for additional depth).

The 3-4 is ideal for teams that have great LBs, poor DTs & DEs, don't have much cash (LBs are cheaper than DTs and DEs), have speedy OLBs, and slow but big D-linemen. I think the 'Skins fit those criteria pretty well.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-09-2004, 01:08 AM   #2
Special Teams
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 298
Ramseyfan, what's your source on the team ruling out the 3-4? If Gregg Williams likes to be flexible and customize the defense for each opponent, it seems to me that he wouldn't want to rule anything out.
Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:17 AM   #3
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
My understanding is that we will use the 3-4 sometimes (as almost every team does), but that the 4-3 will be the base defense. I can't recall if I read that in the Post or on ESPN.com (I do know it was one of the two).
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:25 AM   #4
Special Teams
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 298
We've been running the 4-3 for so long it would be weird to see another base defense. I remember reading somewhere on this forum, I think, that the Skins were planning to bust out with that vintage '85 Super Bowl champion Bears defense, the 46 I think it's called. I wonder if there was something to that or if it was just B.S.
Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:27 AM   #5
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
I haven't heard anything more on that subject.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 07:13 AM   #6
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Gregg Williams is a Buddy Ryan devotee, and has stated that the team will occaisionally use the "46". The downside I see with the 3-4 is that is requires amazing discipline from the LB's - they have greater gap responsibility. Heap all the praise you want on LaVar (and he earns it) but discipline ain't his game.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 08:04 AM   #7
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,237
Remember. A lot of the guys we got for D Line (yeah, the ton we acquired...) can play 3-4 and 4-3. I know Daniels is used to playing both and Griffin could probably handle nose tackle.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 08:18 AM   #8
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 63
Posts: 1,812
Name SB Winners!

Name SB winners that only played the 3-4, please!

The base 4-3 is a necsesity this year, and every year! I don't mind an occasional shift to 3-4 to confuse the O, but I strongly believe in the 4-3!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 10:34 AM   #9
The Starter
 
EEich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,001
Hate to say it backrow... but New England, the team that won two of the last three Superbowls, relies very heavily on the 3-4. When the situation dictated, they used the nickle and goal-line defenses (no team uses only one defense), but their base defense was the 3-4.

Last edited by EEich; 03-09-2004 at 01:02 PM.
EEich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 12:48 PM   #10
Camp Scrub
 
SittingBull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax< VA
Posts: 89
I wonder who will take big ass Washington's place in the Pats 3-4
SittingBull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:05 PM   #11
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 63
Posts: 1,812
EEich!

EEich! Yeah they won a SB, but couldn't beat us, even with OBC at the helm! So, just how good were they?
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:20 PM   #12
The Starter
 
EEich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,001
We beat them when they were decimated by injuries early in the season. They turned out to be better than 31 other teams... so I'd say pretty good.
EEich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:22 PM   #13
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 45
Posts: 4,618
I don't think we have the nose tackle to do it. He's gotta be huge. BUt we're gonna see Lavar at end in the 4-3 at least occasionally, I figure.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 02:23 PM   #14
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWsleep
I don't think we have the nose tackle to do it. He's gotta be huge. BUt we're gonna see Lavar at end in the 4-3 at least occasionally, I figure.
Gilbert Brown was released. Can't get much bigger than that.
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 02:26 PM   #15
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 7,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by backrow
EEich! Yeah they won a SB, but couldn't beat us, even with OBC at the helm! So, just how good were they?

They were good enough to ring off 15 straight games after they beat us, so they were pretty damn good in my opinion. Thats one of the best winning streaks ever!
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25615 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25