![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 957
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! I noticed too that we were more effective with the run when Betts and Rock were in. Can't say it is all of Portis's issue there is a lot more going on but it did make me wonder if it is not time to start relying on others. Loved seeing all the anti Snyder/Vinny signs at the Georgia Dome!
__________________ F#$% the Cowpukes! |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #47 | |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
But what if they do sign it? That's going to crush the dreams of quite a few Redskins fans, and those within the organization too. | |
| | |
| | #48 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 1,716
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! I think people today realized it for the first time. Portis is holding us back because he isn't as quick as he used to be and he can't find the holes. The allegedly poor o-line that can't block for CP sure looked good yesterday when Betts and Cartwright were eating up yards... This could be a blessing in disguise for the redskins if CP is out for a few games. Betts sure looked good.
__________________ Time to nut up or shut up |
| | |
| | #49 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,722
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Above all, the OL is holding this team back. That's been the story all year. Let's not get distracted based on one half where we ran the ball effectively. |
| | |
| | #50 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
He'll also probably end up getting DROY. | |
| | |
| | #51 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
Portis has been a great player and as a fan I will never forget what he has done for the team. However, he lacks the leadership and discipline to be the face of the franchise, and unfortunately he seems to be the face of the franchise.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #52 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
I think you could make an argument for Fletch, but I think Orakpo is having more of an impact season, where as Fletch is more consistent and steady at what he does. | |
| | |
| | #53 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
I think his production on the field and where he stands with the team are two separate arguments. I personally think he's done as an athlete, but I also believe he loves being a Redskin. But this is what you get when you're a losing team; everything is magnified. There's an old saying that winning cures all. When the Redskins were winning, Portis was pretty much the same guy you see right now. I don't think he's changed at all. | |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: San Diego
Posts: 1
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! yup... 5 first half sacks... cant all be blamed on campbell. o-line is an epic fail this season, and campbell and portis are taking heat for it (dont get me wrong though, im still not a huge JC fan) |
| | |
| | #55 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,722
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Portis isn't our top player but with our OL in shambles it's tough to tell how much is on him vs. the line. Plus he's had some lingering ankle issues that have probably slowed him down. |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
Even if ends up with a thousand yards this year, so what? | |
| | |
| | #57 | |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. | |
| | |
| | #58 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,434
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
Portis' numbers are not impressive at all, especially considering how much he gets paid. Running Back is one of the most irrelevant positions in football, yet the Skins highest paid player on Offense is a Running Back. No wonder there's no depth across the O line. Cheap, young and hungry is what your RB should be.
__________________ I am a system poster. | |
| | |
| | #59 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! I was about to post a thread about Betts till I saw this one. Betts, who some here say sucks, looked the same as he always has to me - quick to the hole, straight ahead runner, but sometimes lost in protection. I was always surprised when people here said he'd gotten slow. He just hasn't had many carries. He looks better than CP, though I know the o line woke up for the 2nd half & he benefited. Every year the coaches, whether Al Saunders in the past or S. Smith this year, say in camp how good he looks & how they want to use him. Then come game time he gets in on 3rd downs + 1 or 2 carries. It's never made sense to me, he deserves more carries even when CP is healthy. I honestly think Portis getting all the carries has something to do w/his relationship to the Danny. Otherwise, this year it just doesn't make much sense. Regardless of the poor o line, he's looked slow & indecisive. |
| | |
| | #60 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Portis is a BIG problem!!! Quote:
A 1,000 yard season is hardly the metric for good backs anymore. It's probably closer to 1,300-1,400 with another couple of hundreds yards in receiving to go with it. Those are the numbers of marquee running back in the NFL. Nowadays you can throw any old Joe out there and gain 1,000 yards. It means nothing. I don't think either team playing in last year's Super Bowl had a thousand yard rusher. Correct me if I'm wrong though. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |