Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny?

Mattyk · 12-25-2009, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

The whole point of that article was to just say the last line "But if Shanahan can at least get the Bears to come sniff around a bit, Shanahan might be able to squeeze more money out of the 'Skins."

Sure things could change at the last minute and Shanahan isn't the coach, but the Bears are a hot mess right now. I'd rather go to Buffalo I was Shanny. I think Cutler will bounce back but, apart from the fact that the Bears probably won't pay Lovie and Shanahan all that money, the Bears don't even have a first round or a second round pick. Gaines Adams for a 2nd has to be one of the worst trades in a long, long time.

I just don't see Shanahan in Chicago

What's it going to cost to get Shanahan here you think, $10M a year? More?

dmek25 · 12-25-2009, 10:55 AM

that's probably a pretty good guess. and after the Giants game debacle, Snyder is probably ready to pay anything to get a proven commodity here

SmootSmack · 12-25-2009, 10:59 AM

You know last night I had a dream that we signed Rob Ryan to be our next head coach at 6 years, $67 million. I know right! Rob Ryan!

So I'm going to say 5 years, $55 million

rbanerjee23 · 12-25-2009, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBXVII

When I read statements like these I wonder if the people saying these things are the same people not wanting Shanny or are they really trying to be neutral during all this?

How can one not see the writing on the wall? It's practally written by a street tagger all over the wall.

Washington's
next HC is....
Shanny!

It's neither, wasn't Spurrier supposed to be the savior? then Gibbs? How did those work out exactly, 1 playoff trip and a crushing defeat to the Seahawks.

Yeah, forgive me if I don't seem super pumped until we are an 11-5 team and favorites entering a playoff game.

dmek25 · 12-25-2009, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

You know last night I had a dream that we signed Rob Ryan to be our next head coach at 6 years, $67 million. I know right! Rob Ryan!

So I'm going to say 5 years, $55 million

man, what a bargain

rbanerjee23 · 12-25-2009, 04:12 PM

Going back to the thread title...Chicago is in a much bigger mess than us, at least we have a semblance of WR corps and a pretty good defense. Only thing Chicago has going for it is that Urlacher might come back next season.

Shanny would have to be an idiot to pass up DC for Chi Town even if the money is better.

Dirtbag59 · 12-25-2009, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

Going back to the thread title...Chicago is in a much bigger mess than us, at least we have a semblance of WR corps and a pretty good defense. Only thing Chicago has going for it is that Urlacher might come back next season.

Shanny would have to be an idiot to pass up DC for Chi Town even if the money is better.

More importantly the Chicago franchise is very conservative financially. Not to be confused with cheap a la the Bengals and Cardinals but from what I've read they seem to go out of their way at times to save money. One of the main reasons they're considering keeping Lovie Smith is because they still owe him money.

skins89moss · 12-25-2009, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

Showing any interest in the bears{if he is not already signed and we dont know it} will def give him leverage.Everyone,and i mean everyone,knows we will overpay to get our man.Also shanny could use this to help get more control if he is hired,i.e. he has final say over personel descisions.I wouldnt mind him as a coach but i dont want him making personel descisions,he did a lousy job of that in Denver

Nice quote but when you say we will over pay for our man, who do you me by we? Im a big fan but i have not written any checks to sign or pay the coaches of the Redskins.

skins89moss · 12-25-2009, 10:56 PM

When will the time come that the Redskins can keep a coach for more than 3 years. This has to contribute to our poor recorder over the past 10 years. If you look at the other teams in the NFC East look how long their HC has been in place. These teams seem to have much more success with this method of keeping the same HC and system. I hope we can learn something from them when it comes down to selecting a Head Coach.

GTripp0012 · 12-25-2009, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skins89moss

When will the time come that the Redskins can keep a coach for more than 3 years. This has to contribute to our poor recorder over the past 10 years. If you look at the other teams in the NFC East look how long their HC has been in place. These teams seem to have much more success with this method of keeping the same HC and system. I hope we can learn something from them when it comes down to selecting a Head Coach.

In my opinion, Zorn wasn't bad enough where he had to be fired after two years for the good of the team, but the coaching staff itself needs a shake-up. If you didn't cut your losses with Zorn here, he just becomes a lame duck coach all of next year. It's highly possible that the offense wouldn't improve under Zorn in a third year.

I'm not convinced Shanahan will last more than two years here either. Not that I think he'll get fired, but the temptation to resign will always be there because better jobs will come available. I think if Kyle Shanahan coaches here for a season, and gets a head coaching job in this league after that, that Mike Shanahan will not end the streak of non-Gibbs head coaches that only captain the ship for two years or fewer.

LandrySlice · 12-25-2009, 11:40 PM

Shanahan will coach here more then 2 years, I promise... how could you not collect the ultimate pay day for your family for generations. He will make it work, have faith SKINS!

Paintrain · 12-26-2009, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

In my opinion, Zorn wasn't bad enough where he had to be fired after two years for the good of the team, but the coaching staff itself needs a shake-up. If you didn't cut your losses with Zorn here, he just becomes a lame duck coach all of next year. It's highly possible that the offense wouldn't improve under Zorn in a third year.

I'm not convinced Shanahan will last more than two years here either. Not that I think he'll get fired, but the temptation to resign will always be there because better jobs will come available. I think if Kyle Shanahan coaches here for a season, and gets a head coaching job in this league after that, that Mike Shanahan will not end the streak of non-Gibbs head coaches that only captain the ship for two years or fewer.

I think the opposite about both Shanahans. I'd expect Mike to be here for a good 5 years with the expectation that he'll be succeeded by Kyle.

GusFrerotte · 12-26-2009, 03:43 PM

Just crap to drum up hype to increase rag sales or hits on the net. Chicago is a mess and can't up the ante like The Danny can.

GusFrerotte · 12-26-2009, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

In my opinion, Zorn wasn't bad enough where he had to be fired after two years for the good of the team, but the coaching staff itself needs a shake-up. If you didn't cut your losses with Zorn here, he just becomes a lame duck coach all of next year. It's highly possible that the offense wouldn't improve under Zorn in a third year.

I'm not convinced Shanahan will last more than two years here either. Not that I think he'll get fired, but the temptation to resign will always be there because better jobs will come available. I think if Kyle Shanahan coaches here for a season, and gets a head coaching job in this league after that, that Mike Shanahan will not end the streak of non-Gibbs head coaches that only captain the ship for two years or fewer.

Biggest mistake in hindsight was the way Turner was canned. 7-6 in 2000 and DS pulled the plug, and didn't give Turner a shot at making the playoffs a second time around. Fault the Norv all you want, but with the exception of Gibbs, he had the best O scheme around. In fact he probably had the best O scheme even over Gibbs. THe current bunch of WRs and JC would have broken records ala Johnson/Westbrook/Connell/Alexander in '99 with that system in place. Screw this WCO crap.

GTripp0012 · 12-26-2009, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalisto2010

I'm sorry, but there's not a prominent coach out there that would take the Bears job right now. Who wants to step in and deal with a "franchise" QB who has lost all confidence? Or enter their first draft without the luxury of a first round pick? Also, the ownership in Chicago is very frugal when it comes to free agent acquisitions (minus the Cutler trade). It's going to be a very long time before the Bears start winning again.

The Chicago situation is not difficult to turn around if they bring in someone who is willing to admit that they screwed up in the Cutler trade. Cutler-Knox-Desmond Clark-Olsen-Forte is a very solid start to an NFL offense. The Bears' mistake was assuming that it WAS an offense.

Cut out the dead weight, get rid of Orlando Pace, get rid of Frank Omiyale, get rid of Kevin Shaffer, and draft one tackle, and one guard with your first two (second day) picks, and you'll have a functional offensive line there to protect Cutler. The 2010 Bears aren't exactly going to win a super bowl, but that's a wild card contender with a half decent offensive coach.

12-25-2009, 10:55 AM	#17
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51 Posts: 10,450	Re: Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny? that's probably a pretty good guess. and after the Giants game debacle, Snyder is probably ready to pay anything to get a proven commodity here __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

12-25-2009, 10:59 AM	#18
SmootSmack The Bluths Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 43,225	Re: Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny? You know last night I had a dream that we signed Rob Ryan to be our next head coach at 6 years, $67 million. I know right! Rob Ryan! So I'm going to say 5 years, $55 million __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

12-25-2009, 04:12 PM	#21
rbanerjee23 The Starter Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,320	Re: Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny? Going back to the thread title...Chicago is in a much bigger mess than us, at least we have a semblance of WR corps and a pretty good defense. Only thing Chicago has going for it is that Urlacher might come back next season. Shanny would have to be an idiot to pass up DC for Chi Town even if the money is better. __________________ "Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR

12-25-2009, 10:56 PM	#24
skins89moss Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 2,956	Re: Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny? When will the time come that the Redskins can keep a coach for more than 3 years. This has to contribute to our poor recorder over the past 10 years. If you look at the other teams in the NFC East look how long their HC has been in place. These teams seem to have much more success with this method of keeping the same HC and system. I hope we can learn something from them when it comes down to selecting a Head Coach. __________________ RGIII the franchise QB we have been waiting for since Mark Rypien leads us to a SuperBowl win over the Bills. Redskins Fan Since 1972

12-25-2009, 11:40 PM	#26
LandrySlice Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: AFGHANISTAN Posts: 334	Re: Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny? Shanahan will coach here more then 2 years, I promise... how could you not collect the ultimate pay day for your family for generations. He will make it work, have faith SKINS! __________________ Don't tase me bro!!!!

12-26-2009, 03:43 PM	#28
GusFrerotte Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area Posts: 3,963	Re: Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny? Just crap to drum up hype to increase rag sales or hits on the net. Chicago is a mess and can't up the ante like The Danny can.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Are the Bears a Legit spot for Shanny?

Redskins Locker Room