The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   The Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room
Reload this Page Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2010, 12:45 PM   #76
Gamebreaker
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 33
Posts: 14,884
Re: Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Word on the street is that Shannahan likes Bradford better. What makes you think he would choose Clausen over Bradford if both were available at 4?

My only regret is that this quote is from PFT:


This is from the ESPN rumor section:


Keep in mind I'm not saying you're wrong. You could very well be right but right now all arrows are pointing towards the team targeting Bradford.

ESPN is scrolling that stupid "rumor" on their mock draft on the bottom of the screen to promote their ridiculous mock draft. These "arrows" must be incompetent ESPN writers.

If we draft Bradford instead of a lineman, next year could be worse than this season. I think Bruce Allen is smarter than that. Besides, JC should have really impressed him yesterday.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-04-2010, 01:20 PM   #77
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,202
Re: Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Keep in mind I'm not saying you're wrong. You could very well be right but right now all arrows are pointing towards the team targeting Bradford.
Hopefully a smokescreen and Clausen is the target. We can still get solid OL at the top of the 2nd and there are a couple FA OT available.
__________________
...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:15 PM   #78
Swearinger

 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
Re: Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
Exactly what i said if he is worth drafting the Rams will get him
Steve Spagnuolo is a defensive guy. I think they'll take either Suh or Berry. Both are needs, and both are better pro prospects than any QB out there. It's a relatively deep QB class. They could maybe get Suh and then McCoy with the first pick of the 2nd round.

I absolutely do not think Stl will go QB with #1 overall.
__________________
Insert witty signature here
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:18 PM   #79
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 27
Posts: 13,953
Re: Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
Hopefully a smokescreen and Clausen is the target. We can still get solid OL at the top of the 2nd and there are a couple FA OT available.
Apparently Clausen is a tough SOB.

Jimmy Clausen played for Notre Dame with torn toe ligaments, to have surgery on Tuesday - ESPN
__________________
Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:24 PM   #80
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
Re: Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
ESPN is scrolling that stupid "rumor" on their mock draft on the bottom of the screen to promote their ridiculous mock draft. These "arrows" must be incompetent ESPN writers.

If we draft Bradford instead of a lineman, next year could be worse than this season. I think Bruce Allen is smarter than that. Besides, JC should have really impressed him yesterday.
I don't necessarily think that not taking a lineman in the top 5 means that we're going to have a bad season. There are other opportunities to start to make our line competent; Shanny might not even see Okung as an ideal lineman for his scheme and may want another guy anyways. It's not going to be hard to have a better line than last year, unless we keep it exactly the same.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:26 PM   #81
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 29
Posts: 2,714
Re: Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
I don't necessarily think that not taking a lineman in the top 5 means that we're going to have a bad season. There are other opportunities to start to make our line competent; Shanny might not even see Okung as an ideal lineman for his scheme and may want another guy anyways. It's not going to be hard to have a better line than last year, unless we keep it exactly the same.
Our line could instantly improve by just cutting Heyer
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6

Bookmarks

« Cooley for Marshall????? | NY Giants' Team President John Mara is Pissed!!! »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Contact Us - The Warpath: Redskins Fan Site - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.16000 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24