Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2010, 11:11 PM   #46
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 28
Posts: 14,144
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

CSN Exclusive: Cartwright And Campbell On Shanahan

Cartwright and Campbell watch the Shannahan press conference.
__________________
Charlie: Okay. Take off your seat belt.
Alan: Why?
Charlie: Because when I slam on the brakes I want to watch you go through the windshield.
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-07-2010, 01:21 AM   #47
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 34
Posts: 9,841
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
CSN Exclusive: Cartwright And Campbell On Shanahan

Cartwright and Campbell watch the Shannahan press conference.
I would hope they're watching along with every Skins player as their future rests with the man.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 01:26 AM   #48
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 35
Posts: 12,623
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
CSN Exclusive: Cartwright And Campbell On Shanahan

Cartwright and Campbell watch the Shannahan press conference.
Anyone notice how Rock, Jason, and Chick were all in their socks? Someone doesn't like shoes in the house!!! LOL
__________________
Insert witty signature here
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 07:56 AM   #49
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

I hope that the FO will target SF's two first round picks (If they are high on Clausen or Bradford) and trade down to get them. Then take a LT & Colt McCoy in the first (unless they think he'll be there in the second). Then use the 2nd round pick to draft best player available (hopefully a worhty OT).
__________________
RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!!
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 07:59 AM   #50
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,484
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

I'm not totally convinced that Campbell is staying. I suspect the Skins will offer him a one-year tender and if someone bites and offers another draft pick they'll take it.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 08:12 AM   #51
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 39
Posts: 1,788
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

This scenario is all well and good if the 1st round pick isn't wasted on a QB. This has been and will be debated all over this board, but the offensive line needs to be addressed BIG time. We have the chance to get the best olineman in the draft, and probably a starter in the 2nd round as well. I dont see any need in drafting a QB at all this year. I think this organization will be pleasantly surprised by the success Jason would have behind a good oline.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 08:29 AM   #52
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,605
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
I would keep JC for two to four more. You have to think, what if the newbie is a bust. At least JC is an above average QB and can still play to a decent level. He is better than most lower tier NFL Qbs without a doubt. I hope to god we get a QB like Lefevour, Sheehan, Pike, Stull, or even Kafka. Watching Oklahoma in their bowl game it becoame apparent to me that Stafford might not be all that since his replacement had a monster game. If Clausen was so great the Irish should have made a bowl game like Kafka and Northwestern did with less talent. Tebow will be a decent NFL QB but will not live up to the hype surrounding him. Neither will Colt. The Big 12 is all offense and not much in terms of defense. Without those guys( meaning the second tier QBs mentioned before) their respective teams would have sucked. Lefevour is a stud. Stull and Pike are gamers. I like Kafka because the guy basically was the Northwestern offense in '09. He isn't afraid to run and the NW spread might help him with Shanny's version of the WCO.

Yeah, and his replacement also struggled in a bunch of games and they lost way more than they would have it Bradford would have been healthy.

Based on your logic, the Colts were stupid for drafting Peyton Manning, because Heath Schuler was a bust playing in the same system. Or that Carson Palmer, John David Booty, Matt Leinart and Dirty Sanchez are all exactly the same player, because they put up similar stats playing in the same system.

The "system QB" argument is a joke and not all QBs are created equally. If the consensus is that Bradford is a top 5 pick, then he's a top 5 pick. It doesn't guarantee he'll be great, but then again nothing is guaranteed in the draft.

The bottom line is that there will be one or more QBs who get drafted next year that will go on to become great franchise QBs. The Skins wouldn't be stupid to take a chance at getting one with their first pick. The reward is worth the risk.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 08:34 AM   #53
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,438
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I'm not totally convinced that Campbell is staying. I suspect the Skins will offer him a one-year tender and if someone bites and offers another draft pick they'll take it.
Let's say it's a high pick like Bradford, do you think it's possible he starts as a rookie?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 08:40 AM   #54
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,427
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Let's say it's a high pick like Bradford, do you think it's possible he starts as a rookie?
I would think he has to unless we bring in some type of vet QB until he's ready...

If anything I can behind though is letting rookies take their lumps. If we do take Bradford I hope he's tougher than his track record behind THIS line.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 09:50 AM   #55
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna Va
Posts: 1,029
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

It just makes no sense to draft a QB that high who has duribility questions. As to trading down, I don't see why asking about Marshall on draft day isn't a good move. The guy can play and gives us a chance to get rid of ARE and gives us a true #1 WR. Synder likes big names and it helps that Shanahan is familar w/ Marshall. Draft an OT at 10 (the kid from MD) and get a OG in the 2nd. We "could" draft a QB in the 4th, but I don't think that's smart.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 09:55 AM   #56
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,484
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
I would keep JC for two to four more. You have to think, what if the newbie is a bust. At least JC is an above average QB and can still play to a decent level. He is better than most lower tier NFL Qbs without a doubt. I hope to god we get a QB like Lefevour, Sheehan, Pike, Stull, or even Kafka. Watching Oklahoma in their bowl game it becoame apparent to me that Stafford might not be all that since his replacement had a monster game. If Clausen was so great the Irish should have made a bowl game like Kafka and Northwestern did with less talent. Tebow will be a decent NFL QB but will not live up to the hype surrounding him. Neither will Colt. The Big 12 is all offense and not much in terms of defense. Without those guys( meaning the second tier QBs mentioned before) their respective teams would have sucked. Lefevour is a stud. Stull and Pike are gamers. I like Kafka because the guy basically was the Northwestern offense in '09. He isn't afraid to run and the NW spread might help him with Shanny's version of the WCO.
-Bradford, not Stafford

-If Clausen played defense, maybe the Irish would have made a bowl game

-I've never understood the notion that a starter might not be all that when their replacements play well. When Steve Young stepped in for Joe Montana and succeeded did that suddenly mean Joe Cool was overrated, when Jeff Hostetler won a Super Bowl with the Giants did that mean suddenly Phil Simms was a bad QB? Also, it should be noted that often times the offense is dumbed down significantly for backups so that they don't have to do so much to carry the team to victory. So it's not always a fair comparison between starter and backup

-You'd love to get a guy like Pike...but you didn't mention that his backup, Zach Collaros, completed over 80% of his passes in three starts with 8 TDs and zero interceptions...that must mean Pike ain't all that
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 09:56 AM   #57
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,484
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Let's say it's a high pick like Bradford, do you think it's possible he starts as a rookie?
Definitely
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 10:08 AM   #58
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
If 2010 is uncapped he will be a restricted free agent and isn't going to have much say in the matter.
He could sign an offer sheet with another team with a poison pill or two. I suspect the interest will depend on how high a tender the Redskins place on him.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 10:11 AM   #59
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,963
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Skins Fan View Post
He could sign an offer sheet with another team with a poison pill or two. I suspect the interest will depend on how high a tender the Redskins place on him.
It's because of the compensation (first and a third) that he won't receive an offer sheet no matter who is interested in having him.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 10:18 AM   #60
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,303
Re: Campbell will compete with a rookie next yr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
It just makes no sense to draft a QB that high who has duribility questions. As to trading down, I don't see why asking about Marshall on draft day isn't a good move. The guy can play and gives us a chance to get rid of ARE and gives us a true #1 WR. Synder likes big names and it helps that Shanahan is familar w/ Marshall. Draft an OT at 10 (the kid from MD) and get a OG in the 2nd. We "could" draft a QB in the 4th, but I don't think that's smart.
No, it doesn't. The two had a serious falling out in Denver. I'll bet Shanny digs Don Hutson out of his grave and signs him before he even thinks of bringing in Marshall.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29567 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25