Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Leonard Little? Why

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2010, 02:50 PM   #16
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
You can play AH at any spot on a 3-4 front.

Fletcher has already said he's down with a 3-4 if the team goes to it.
Even NT?
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-16-2010, 02:57 PM   #17
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,632
Re: Leonard Little? Why

First of all, this isn't a PFT story, as in PFT didn't break any news here. All they did was link to another article.

Secondly, I think Little is very talented

Third, he should be thanking Paul Tagliabue everyday because if he had pulled that DUI homicide followed by DUI again under Goodell's watch there's no way he'd even be anywhere near a football field

And finally, just because Haslett told someone Little could still be productive is not the same as Redskins are interested in Little.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 02:58 PM   #18
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Leonard Little? Why

NT= Vince Wilfork possible free agent.
LL next to AH could revitilize his love for the game. Richard Seymore would also be a nice option to bring to DC if he hits the market.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:03 PM   #19
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
NT= Vince Wilfork possible free agent.
LL next to AH could revitilize his love for the game. Richard Seymore would also be a nice option to bring to DC if he hits the market.
NT-VW- Pats are gonna re-sign him or franchise tag him. It would be a dream come true for him to come if we did go 3-4 but if we stayed 4-3 imagine him and Albert Haynesworth.


LL-Only depending if its a 4-3 than I would agree,
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:05 PM   #20
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: baltimore
Posts: 3,258
Re: Leonard Little? Why

[QUOTE=redskins202;663527] Why do people here keep saying we will go to a 3-4?.


QUOTE]

bruce allen said in the redskins address a few weeks ago in response to a question about possibly switching to the 3-4 . . .

he said they were going to run the "skins defense" with a tone that sounded like he had a smile on his face. he also said he wasnt going to give other teams a heads up on what they were planning D scheme wise.

he said more than what i put here, and he left it a bit vague on purpose but reading btw the lines it sure sounded like we are going to be running a hybrid defense if not a more 3-4 heavy hybrid.
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:17 PM   #21
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,240
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
Even NT?
Sure why not?

His ex-coordinator doesn't seem to think it would be a problem.

Redskins Insider - Where will Haynesworth fit in Haslett's defense?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:32 PM   #22
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Leonard Little? Why

[quote=over the mountain;663554]
Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
Why do people here keep saying we will go to a 3-4?.


QUOTE]

bruce allen said in the redskins address a few weeks ago in response to a question about possibly switching to the 3-4 . . .

he said they were going to run the "skins defense" with a tone that sounded like he had a smile on his face. he also said he wasnt going to give other teams a heads up on what they were planning D scheme wise.

he said more than what i put here, and he left it a bit vague on purpose but reading btw the lines it sure sounded like we are going to be running a hybrid defense if not a more 3-4 heavy hybrid.
More than likely it will be sorta kinda 75% 4-3 D, 35% 3-4.


I don't mind Leonardo Little coming here for pass rushing downs. If used right our D will be deadly because at times our pass rush was inconsistant. With a very aggressive DC like Haslett than expect us to blitz and use all sorts of type of things on our DL.


I dont care about Little pass death thing. This isn't a area of friendship or community this is about winning football games. Joey Porter F up Levi Jones but it didn't stop the Dolphins having a very good LB in him.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:35 PM   #23
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,632
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
I dont care about Little pass death thing. This isn't a area of friendship or community this is about winning football games. Joey Porter F up Levi Jones but it didn't stop the Dolphins having a very good LB in him.
Not quite the same situation at all.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:38 PM   #24
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,517
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
More than likely it will be sorta kinda 75% 4-3 D, 35% 3-4.

...
Glad to see our D will be giving 110% now THAT's Redskins Football
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:38 PM   #25
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Not quite the same situation at all.
Sometimes your gonna have to pick up a guy who will help you win some SB's. Unless Little killed the girl on purpose than I wouldn't want him. But his skills are still useful if healthy.


But its just me....I'm not that preist for us to get this guy.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:40 PM   #26
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,240
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Glad to see our D will be giving 110% now THAT's Redskins Football
lol oh man

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:46 PM   #27
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Smile Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
lol oh man

Gotta play 110% football all the time not 100% haha.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:47 PM   #28
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Leonard Little? Why

change of scenary could be good for LL. Or Albert and he will be drinking buddies in the Reston town center LOL
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:49 PM   #29
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,632
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202 View Post
Sometimes your gonna have to pick up a guy who will help you win some SB's. Unless Little killed the girl on purpose than I wouldn't want him. But his skills are still useful if healthy.


But its just me....I'm not that preist for us to get this guy.
Last I checked the Rams have been among the worst, if not the worst, team in the NFL for the past few years so I'm sure there are other guys out there who are just as capable of helping us win some SBs
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 03:59 PM   #30
Camp Scrub
 
redskins202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Leonard Little? Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Last I checked the Rams have been among the worst, if not the worst, team in the NFL for the past few years so I'm sure there are other guys out there who are just as capable of helping us win some SBs
True. Maybe I would want Little is when healthy and I guess used right he'll pass rush the QB pretty we'll enough to force throws into our coverage. It's just me tho. Think it would be smart to start Jarmon Jermon if anything.
redskins202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27502 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25