Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Brandon or T.O. ?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2010, 02:49 PM   #31
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 9,951
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
But no one wants to give them that. Just like the Redskins want at least a 3rd for JC, but no one wants to give them that
If a third string QB like Charlie Whitehurs is worth swap of second round picks (a 20 spot move up for the Chargers) and next year's third rounder I can't imagine why we couldn't get at least a 3rd rounder. The Skins' must want more than a 3rd rounder.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-26-2010, 02:49 PM   #32
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Nice source.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 02:50 PM   #33
Special Teams
 
Audi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Hey, it's uncapped year. Why not both?
Audi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 02:50 PM   #34
Special Teams
 
Ade Jimoh Fan Club's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 410
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I personally think this would be a fair trade for Brandon Marshall:

* We trade 1st round picks with Denver
* We trade 2nd round picks with Denver
* We give them our 4th round pick

DEN gets the 4th, 37th and 103rd

WAS gets the 11th, 45th and Brandon Me-First Marshall

According to the Trade Value Matrix, DEN would get a value of 2,418 and WAS would get 1,700 + Marshall. The 718 difference equates to the 25th pick in the first round of the draft - so in short, DEN would be getting the equivalent of a 1st rounder, and we'd be maintaining our first two picks in a very deep draft AND picking up a legit WR1.

Your thoughts?? Is this too logical for NFL GM's?

Option #2 - bring back THE ADE!!
Ade Jimoh Fan Club is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 02:59 PM   #35
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
If a third string QB like Charlie Whitehurs is worth swap of second round picks (a 20 spot move up for the Chargers) and next year's third rounder I can't imagine why we couldn't get at least a 3rd rounder. The Skins' must want more than a 3rd rounder.
"Prices" for QBs always tend to be on the extreme side. They cost a lot if they're even "just good", and they're dirt cheap if no one wants them. Apparently, no one wants to "buy" Campbell for a 2nd or 1st rounder, and for damn good reason.
Campbell's not a sure thing. It's basically gambling with Campbell vs. gambling with grabbing a stud 1st or 2nd round player from the draft, and most would rather gamble with the draft than with a QB who has not shown much in all of his years in the league and has two attributes that leads to near-certain QB failure: bad accuracy and bad pocket presence.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 02:59 PM   #36
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,789
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Nice source.
It basically is just a link to the source from the Washington Post in the original post of this thread
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:00 PM   #37
Camp Scrub
 
flaskinsfan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I would definately say Brandon Marshall. One, TO is way past his prime and a headache. Also, I went to UCF so I like Brandon Marshall.

T.O. sucks.
__________________
flaSKINSfan8
http://redskinswarcry.blogspot.com
flaskinsfan8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:05 PM   #38
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,789
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
If a third string QB like Charlie Whitehurs is worth swap of second round picks (a 20 spot move up for the Chargers) and next year's third rounder I can't imagine why we couldn't get at least a 3rd rounder. The Skins' must want more than a 3rd rounder.
Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:13 PM   #39
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
It basically is just a link to the source from the Washington Post in the original post of this thread
Yeah, thanks. I was going to say I waited until I saw a more reliable source and when it was reported here quoting the Insider then I figured it was safe to post it. and....I still get the spanking.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:14 PM   #40
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ade Jimoh Fan Club View Post
I personally think this would be a fair trade for Brandon Marshall:

* We trade 1st round picks with Denver
* We trade 2nd round picks with Denver
* We give them our 4th round pick

DEN gets the 4th, 37th and 103rd

WAS gets the 11th, 45th and Brandon Me-First Marshall

According to the Trade Value Matrix, DEN would get a value of 2,418 and WAS would get 1,700 + Marshall. The 718 difference equates to the 25th pick in the first round of the draft - so in short, DEN would be getting the equivalent of a 1st rounder, and we'd be maintaining our first two picks in a very deep draft AND picking up a legit WR1.

Your thoughts?? Is this too logical for NFL GM's?

Option #2 - bring back THE ADE!!
I'll take option #2 please.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:20 PM   #41
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flaskinsfan8 View Post
I would definately say Brandon Marshall. One, TO is way past his prime and a headache. Also, I went to UCF so I like Brandon Marshall.

T.O. sucks.
I have to say this is an extremely nice arguement. Fair and to the point.

I'd still take T.O. There is no draft pick required. I will say that I wouldn't mind Marshall if Denver would take one of our draft picks from next year. We are 2 short this year. No need to over do it.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:24 PM   #42
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I just want to know how on earth could anyone say no to taking an emotional person like this. He's obviously loves his teamates. We need some of this......

YouTube - Terrell Owens crying like a baby.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:29 PM   #43
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though
Smoot got to disagree. Whitehurst is grabidge
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:37 PM   #44
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,789
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I don't have any real opinion of Whitehurst, I've seen enough of him to say...I have no real opinion of him.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 03:47 PM   #45
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 2,656
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well they're no longer asking for more than a 3rd rounder (they haven't lately at least). I think others have mentioned it but it seems like Whitehurst has more "value" because of what he has the potential to accomplish. I think most execs feel like they've seen enough of Campbell to know what to expect from him.

Redskins and Broncos, to my knowledge, had very preliminary talks at the beginning of free agency about Marshall but nothing came out of that. Right now, no team is budging on giving up a 1st for Marshall. Redskins will wait and see if it gets to the point that the Broncos feel forced to get rid of Marshall, and the talk was that some package could involve Landry and Kelly.

Who knows for sure though
Ugh not Landry...I really think he can still be a good player with different coaching. He's one of the very few players on the roster i would rather not trade.
__________________
Section 115 Row 23

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

http://victorybeer.com/
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28998 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25