Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Brandon or T.O. ?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2010, 11:56 AM   #1
Impact Rookie
 
SOUL-SKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 867
Brandon or T.O. ?

This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall.

Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall?
__________________
TODD COLLINS WILL ALWAYS HOLD A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART
SOUL-SKINS is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-26-2010, 12:03 PM   #2
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:04 PM   #3
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out.

I would say no to TO under any circumstance.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:07 PM   #4
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:28 PM   #5
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!
Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:36 PM   #6
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 36
Posts: 5,829
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:39 PM   #7
Impact Rookie
 
doughtydoubter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the glorious city of DC
Posts: 697
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Tee View Post
Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.
good point
doughtydoubter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:41 PM   #8
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: newport news, va
Age: 35
Posts: 749
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:49 PM   #9
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry View Post
I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.
We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:51 PM   #10
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Do not sign either of them. We are trying to build a team for the long term. T.O. is too old, but that is actually the least of his problems. We would have to give up too much to get Marshall and he has character problems too.

We need to build from the inside out. If we trade for Marshall, we will have no o-line, which is much more important. Plus, we need to give Thomas and Kelly a shot.
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:51 PM   #11
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,625
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Neither.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:52 PM   #12
Camp Scrub
 
McD5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 34
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall.

A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.
McD5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:59 PM   #13
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 36
Posts: 5,829
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.
Look, I don't care who we have playing WR. Once they get to that level (NFL) all of them can peform to a satisfactory level, all they have to do is catch the ball when they are thrown to. The guys we have will look like studs as soon as Campbell or whoever the QB is, is not throwing off of his right ass cheek anymore.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 01:01 PM   #14
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,443
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

I cannot fathom the continuing talk about Brandon Marshall and the Redskins. Shanny wanted to ditch him in Denver. Therefore Shanny is not bringing him to Washington. End of story, it seems to me.

As for TO, I don't want him taking playing time from Thomas and Kelly.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 01:08 PM   #15
MVP
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,118
Re: Brandon or T.O. ?

Marshall by far and away.....but Ill take neither at this point if it means giving away draft picks....We need to add a WR with ARE gone. At this point wait for more cuts, I really dont waste another pick on one...we have the youth, lets add a dependable vet for cheap.
__________________
@RSherman_25 just make sure you stay in Seattle cause without that pass rush you are who we thought you were. 5th rd PK no speed good hands

DeAngelo Hall (@DeAngeloHall23) March 14, 2014
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25792 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25