![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you want McNabb on the Skins? | |||
| Yes | | 25 | 30.49% |
| No | | 57 | 69.51% |
| Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? comcast just reported that the eagles released a statement saying they will not trade mcnabb within the nfc east.
__________________ Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,813
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? I agree. ill take mcnabb for 5 years over another Jason Campbell type project any day of the week. perhaps we wouldnt even have to give up a pick. im thinking we just swap first rounders or something like that
__________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
| |
| | #33 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 246
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? I'm not saying McNabb is a bad QB, he will probably go to the Hall. His game is system specific in my opinion, Reid built that team and scheme around him, and Donovan has a bad rep in big games, a lot of it deserved. I also don't see this team as being Championship contending for 3-4 years, when McNabb's career is over. Grab a young QB this year, even if it is Tebow, and build a Championship team around him as he grows into the position. In 4 years, our QB will be in his prime, and with a solid team around him. |
| |
| | #34 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? I think one should remember to consider whether he will retire 4 or 5 years from now. |
| |
| | #35 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 37
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? Quote:
I don't think people are admitting how awful Zorn truly was. Has anyone heard what Campbell said about when Zorn came here? Campbell is 6-5. The first thing Zorn taught him was to be "smaller" in the pocket. Campbell said that since he was a kid he was taught to be tall in the pocket. Now who the eff has ever said that QBs are better when they are lower in the pocket? Shanahan is worth at least 4 wins over that idiot. Poor Baltimore, he is going to find a way to ruin their QB. | |
| |
| | #36 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 118
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? Okay, anyone who's been keeping track, I am all for Jason Campbell and I don't blame him at all for our downfall. For instance the fact that he hasn't had a big win where he made the big comeback is not his fault. For example, he put up big numbers against Gregg William's Defense and almost beat the undefeated Saints. After an allpro level game, he BEGAN a bigtime comeback drive... then Sellers fumbled... so it's not like JC is the enemy and i do firmly believe that with the new system, and an o-line, JC can shine. That being said, McNabb is, right now, a better quarterback... Period. If we got McNabb and lost JC... i would get over it. ESPECIALY if we picked up a 2nd or 3rd round QB to learn under him. JC training Tebow vs McNabb training Tebow... Hmmm... Donovan would give us a legitimately higher chance THIS year and would allow for a better chance of a better replacement in the future. |
| |
| | #37 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? all eagles are BUMS! |
| |
| | #38 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,614
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? Getting McNabb would be a huge mistake. I just hope this is just BA f'ing around with other teams. I'm still amazed at how so many fans still think we're one player away from contending. We need to rebuild (starting with the oline) and stop wasting picks on what seems like a quick fix.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| |
| | #39 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? Quote:
I don't think anyone would argue that the Eagles had a hell of a lot better OL due to their constantly replenishing the OL through the draft. Yet McNoodles stats are not that much better then Campbells. He had 5 more TD's. Only a few less interceptions with about 75 less yrds on the year. Due to that his QB rating was about 10 points higher? All because of the less yrds and fewer interceptions. Yep, McNoodle is definitly a hell of a lot better. | |
| |
| | #40 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? |
| |
| | #41 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? 33-year old McNabb isn't a meaningful improvement on Campbell. No reason to be delusional on this tire-kicking. It's merely a personal preference between two middle-of-the-pack guys. When he's on the open market, lets consider him as a veteran stopgap. Until then, let's just calm down and let these trade winds blow over.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| |
| | #42 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? |
| |
| | #43 | |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? Quote:
McNabb is certainly not a BUM, i'm just referring to the fact that he is an EAGLE and I hate the IGGLES, so can you really blame me? But McNabb is certainly a first ballot HOF in my honest opinion. But, I do feel the best QB if we were to draft one would be Clausen...I know wrong thread...but that's just how I feel. I don't have any screws loose so don't worry fellas. Although some of my posts may lead people to believe otherwise! | |
| |
| | #44 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? I'm totally at a loss as to how someone like Campbell can look to have done better in almost each catagory or be relativily close in stats in others and have two totally different passer ratings. |
| |
| | #45 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 37
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Mcnabb to Washington? Quote:
JC is a middle of the pack guy, no doubt. McNabb isn't even close. Here is the bottom line, Philly under McNabb has dominated the NFC East. It isn't even close. JC has accomplished nothing, and I mean NOTHING. He hasn't won any meaningful regular season games. He has won no divisions. He hasn't been to the playoffs, let alone win a playoff game. He has been to zero NFC Championship games and from a statistical perspective JC is way below the mean from a winning percentage as a starting QB. Do we need to bring up Pro-Bowls? If we are talking about winning, which is why they step on the field, McNabb is a great quarterback. JC is a nobody. So you need to be a little more specific when you lump the two together. | |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |