![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #61 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Aaron Schatz: not someone I talked to. FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis | Washington's Small Upgrade
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #62 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
The guy said he thought it might be similar to the Brunell situation. I said it's not. Now what is the point you are trying to make? | |
| | |
| | #63 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,813
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) youre not considering what could have been done with the 2nd round pick. How about this? Wait until the 37th pick is made in the draft and let us know if that player (or any player still available at that point) is better than McNabb. At MOST, you could say there's a chance that a player available at that point could contribute more to the team over the next 3-4 years than McNabb. But not a single player available at that point - at any position - would be clearly better than McNabb. Yes, McNabb is not the long-term answer at QB. But the fact is, using a top draft pick on a quarterback would be the worst possible thing this team could do right now. Right now, if we drafted a QB, it would be by a coaching staff and GM in their first 4 months on the job. the scouts evaluating QB prospects are vinny cerrato holdovers awaiting unemployment. Finding a franchise QB in the NFL draft is one of (if not the) hardest things to do in all of professional sports. By trading for McNabb, we've bought ourselves a couple of years to find him. When we do, the task will be handled by a GM, head coach, and scouting department who have all been working together for at least one or two full seasons. And when we fiinally find that franchise QB, he'll be learning the ropes from a future Hall-of-Fame quarterback and not Jason Campbell or Rex Grossman. Unless McNabb really has absolutely nothing left in the tank, I simply don't understand how anyone can think the Skins made a bad move.
__________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
| | |
| | #64 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
And once the argument leaves the point where you're debating the facts, it's clear you'd rather I be wrong than you be right.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #65 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Fair enough, excellent way to frame it, BHA.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,978
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) It's just that you talked about it so generally. Like a cop going through a crime scene and speculating what he thinks happened.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #67 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
I brought up your previous predictions to contrast to this following declaration you made: "Again, you're not getting a prediction from me whether or not he will crash in 2010 or not." I do see that you have a problem with following the conversation and sticking to the point, though. | |
| | |
| | #68 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,208
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
They know that we have finished at the bottom of our division for about 10 years straight, and thats not likely to change much this year or next. They also probably had no intentions of resigning him after this year and thought that the Redskins could be likely suitors for him next year especially if we kept Campbell around this year. So yeah they send a their pretty good qb to us, but we are the worst team in the division so how bad could it be. So in exchange for a guy that was going to be cut in a year they get a very high second (immediate contributor) and probably a third next year. Also for people that were against the Gaither potential trade for the simple fact that we can sign him in FA next year you shouldnt be for this trade. It’s the same thing, except a little more costly pick-wise.
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #69 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
In the absence of personal expertise on what makes the Shanahan offense click, your entire argument is valueless. You critique me for appealing to my own expertise, but I'm very forthright in where I'm deriving my opinions. You just write stuff seemingly to make me read it.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #70 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) That's three things cleverly disguised as two!
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #71 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
You're still not getting a single-year prediction from me, just an obvious observation regarding the evidence that disproves that there are no signs of decline for McNabb. No idea why this reluctance to predict something I don't have a great read on caused you to bring up some wide range of things I predicted.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #72 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) I lol'ed.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #73 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,183
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Funny how a year ago it seemed like Cutler was going to be a Redskin and rumors were out there about McNabb ending up in Chicago. |
| | |
| | #74 |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Now that it's done, I'm 90% in favor. But the one thing that's been on my mind is pick #37 this year. In the long run, wouldn't it have been better to take the two best offensive tackles in the 1st and 2nd knowing how horrific the line was last year? Doesn't matter anymore though. |
| | |
| | #75 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
| Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II) Quote:
By the way, please stop claiming things are so "obvious" or trying to assert opinions as fact. It doesn't work, unless you have a credible record, which you don't. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |