Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2010, 12:59 AM   #46
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,077
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87) View Post
The ravens had the highest ranked o-line in the NFL last year. That they would diminish it for a TE is highly unlikely.
Well the Ravens are looking to get rid of Gaither obviously, but they will most likely trade him for a pick rather than a player (for some reason people think this is the NBA where players are traded for players). Some times I feel these Gaither threads are just people finding ways for us to get a good lineman without using our first round pick.

Anyway, it sounds like Gaither is damaged enough that the Ravens are willing to part ways with him, I hope we stay away from him if this is the case. Let's just get Okung or Williams.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-12-2010, 07:04 AM   #47
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,677
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker View Post
no no no we need to keep both of our tight ends to run 2 TE sets and what about an injury like last season? we need the depth

i would take okung over gaither anyways
Ahh, the all-important 2 TE sets. Every Super Bowl winner the last 10 years won because of their impossible to defend 2 TE sets
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:50 AM   #48
Special Teams
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 468
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Personally, I like for a team to have two offensive tackles.
Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:17 AM   #49
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Campbell for Gaither to re-unite him with Zorn. (not serious)


I also do not understand the "trade Cooley" being thrown around so easily and so often. I think people are really forgetting how good he is for us. So he broke his foot...big deal. Cooley should start over Davis and they both should be retained for not only depth, but to utilize them together. Davis is more of an oversized WR than blocking TE who can catch like Cooley. They can both contribute differently to our team.

I'd love to get Gaither, but not at the cost of one of our two more productive players.

Trade Landry or Carter and a late pick for him, but not a Top 10 TE in either Cooley or Davis.

I think Baltimore would rather find Heap's eventual replacement thrugh the draft anyways.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:36 AM   #50
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,658
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Campbell for Gaither to re-unite him with Zorn. (not serious)


I also do not understand the "trade Cooley" being thrown around so easily and so often. I think people are really forgetting how good he is for us. So he broke his foot...big deal. Cooley should start over Davis and they both should be retained for not only depth, but to utilize them together. Davis is more of an oversized WR than blocking TE who can catch like Cooley. They can both contribute differently to our team.

I'd love to get Gaither, but not at the cost of one of our two more productive players.

Trade Landry or Carter and a late pick for him, but not a Top 10 TE in either Cooley or Davis.

I think Baltimore would rather find Heap's eventual replacement thrugh the draft anyways.
This.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:49 AM   #51
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

I'm not really interested in Gaither anymore. I have never been able to find anything specific, but the Ravens wouldnt have drafted Oher or be willing to trade a starting left tackle for a 2nd round pick unless there was a serious problem with the guy.

id much rather sign Adams to play RT and trade for bushrod to play LT.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 02:46 PM   #52
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 44
Posts: 3,429
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Trade for Brandon Marshall

B Marshall stats the last 3 seasons
2009- 101 catches 1120 yards
2008- 104 catches 1265 yards
2007- 102 catches 1120 yards


We shouldn't trade for BM his catches & yards went down in 2009 he's on the decline. I'M JOKING BIG TIME.

NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:25 PM   #53
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 12,514
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82 View Post
Trade for Brandon Marshall

B Marshall stats the last 3 seasons
2009- 101 catches 1120 yards
2008- 104 catches 1265 yards
2007- 102 catches 1120 yards


We shouldn't trade for BM his catches & yards went down in 2009 he's on the decline. I'M JOKING BIG TIME.

Some people here would argue that lol
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 01:42 PM   #54
Registered User
 
MCWHITEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

I would sent Cooley packing before Mr Davis.
MCWHITEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 01:46 PM   #55
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MCWHITEY View Post
I would sent Cooley packing before Mr Davis.
Why? I think Cooley has proven himself here. He's not THAT old.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 02:02 PM   #56
Camp Scrub
 
DCSportsFan98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Melwood
Posts: 19
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

WE ARE NOT TRADING COOLEY OR DAVIS!!!
__________________
"The key is to score more points than the other team. If we can do this I think we have a good chance of winning." -Jim Zorn
DCSportsFan98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 04:51 PM   #57
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,077
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCSportsFan98 View Post
WE ARE NOT TRADING COOLEY OR DAVIS!!!
Or trading for Gaither, and this is not the NBA were player for player trades happen that often. What's wrong with taking the best tackle (if available) at #4?
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.22688 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25