Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Redskins Locker Room


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2010, 10:58 PM   #16
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
So it all comes down to this. Schefter vs JLC. Although it's not cut and dry (JLC can still say Haynesworth was shopped if he stays on the team) it will be a "battle" that the fan base will be able to recall throughout the piles of rumors we've been exposed to in the last few months.

Yeah, I think you nailed it Dirtbag. It is the media trying to one up the other or just create "noise" to justify them having their jobs. Most of our more NFL/Skins literate fellow posters in here could write better articles than most NFL.com or Fox Sports.com writers anyday.
GusFrerotte is offline  

Advertisements
Old 04-19-2010, 11:04 PM   #17
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,269
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

I think JLC is still bitter about not breaking the Haynesworth news last year. Personally I think he's crap.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:07 PM   #18
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Could be sour grapes Ruhskins, but who knows. I think it would make sense to trade AH if he is indeed unhappy about the 3-4 switch, and especially if the supposed comments about the 2 sacks was an actual statement made to AH. Trade AH to Detroit for 2 second rounders.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:10 PM   #19
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,399
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Justa Lying Columnist.
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:15 PM   #20
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

We will see by this Saturday if he is full of BS. Either way it is going to be exciting.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:35 PM   #21
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,789
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
The only thing about this that caught my eye was what he said Shanny told AH about if him having more than 2 sacks something was wrong. If Shanny did tell him something along those lines I would want to split also if I could. To me that part of the article, if indeed true, would explain why AH is pissed.
That part caught my eye because it seemed too incredible. A space eater NT against the run can still rack up more than 2 sacks. It is good for the team if the blob NT gets more than two sacks. So if Shanny even thought that, much less said it to AH, then Shanny has lost his marbles.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:46 PM   #22
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

The quote that JLC gave was completely idiotic. Paraphrasing: "If you get more than 2 sacks then something is wrong". I would be willing to be every penny that I ever made that Shanahan never said that. Even if AH played nose every down he would get more than 2 sacks. JLC is full of shit.

Even that idiotic granola Zorn wouldn't use AH only to take up 2 blockers every play.

One, Haslett called him. 2 McNabb called him. 3 Haslett is talking about using him all over the front 7. These guys wouldn't be jumping through hoops if they wanted him out.

If JLC made all of this up, he should never be allowed to report on the Redskins again. He looks like an effing douchbag anyway. Tell him to drop 50 and become the next Jared for Subway. What an effing tool.
Pocket$ $traight is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:47 PM   #23
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,269
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Could be sour grapes Ruhskins, but who knows. I think it would make sense to trade AH if he is indeed unhappy about the 3-4 switch, and especially if the supposed comments about the 2 sacks was an actual statement made to AH. Trade AH to Detroit for 2 second rounders.
I think if this is true, then we have more problems than just a bitter reporter making up shit.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:49 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Jared LaCanfora needs an ass whooping.
Pocket$ $traight is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:51 PM   #25
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 12,514
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Well Wilfork didn't get any last year.. has like 7.5 on his career.. probably a good benchmark.. it's not very common for an NT to get more than 2.. Ratliff did pull in 6 last year.. but that was 2 against us and 2 against Philly.. neither of which had great pass pro
tryfuhl is offline  
Old 04-19-2010, 11:57 PM   #26
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,269
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Well Wilfork didn't get any last year.. has like 7.5 on his career.. probably a good benchmark.. it's not very common for an NT to get more than 2.. Ratliff did pull in 6 last year.. but that was 2 against us and 2 against Philly.. neither of which had great pass pro
Still, I think it'd be stupid for any coach to take someone like AH and make them a 100 million dollar plug in the middle. Shit, in that case let's put McNabb at running back and CP as offensive tackle (hey, he is a good pass blocker).
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:01 AM   #27
Playmaker
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 4,709
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Casey Hampton from Pit had 2.5 last year.

Maybe the comment was taken from MS concerning the NT position in general.

The good NT don't get after the passer, and I beleive the Skins would use AH in a much more aggressive role.
__________________
Robert Griffin III welcome to the Washington Redskins!

Year 1 - NFC EAST Champions at 10-6

Year 2 - 3-10... Benched 14 weeks to late.....

Year 3 - Pure Awesomeness!!

http://site.fandangoracinginc.com/
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:05 AM   #28
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 12,514
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Still, I think it'd be stupid for any coach to take someone like AH and make them a 100 million dollar plug in the middle. Shit, in that case let's put McNabb at running back and CP as offensive tackle (hey, he is a good pass blocker).
Agreed; anyone who's read my thoughts on the matter would know that I agree with this haha
tryfuhl is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:12 AM   #29
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
So it all comes down to this. Schefter vs JLC. Although it's not cut and dry (JLC can still say Haynesworth was shopped if he stays on the team) it will be a "battle" that the fan base will be able to recall throughout the piles of rumors we've been exposed to in the last few months.

That is a pretty easy choice.
Pocket$ $traight is offline  
Old 04-20-2010, 09:09 AM   #30
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block.

I think a lot of people on here don't give JLC his just due. I mean the NFL network didn't hire him because he was a slouch. People took his comments on the blog & acted as if that was his "reporting" which it wasn't, it's a blog, which pretty much have few rules.

Also, for all those saying that JLC isn't ethical in so many words, doesn't anyone see a potential conflict of interest w/Schefter reporting the skins? I'm not saying there is, but his past w/Shanny could impact his info on the team to one extreme or the other. He may not want to do 'investigative journalism' behind Shanny's back, whereas JLC will. I certainly wouldn't assume that Schefter always has the inside scoop on the skins.

Don't these two guys -Schefter & JLC- work for the same employer?
freddyg12 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26758 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25