![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #91 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,753
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
Fact that he will be wearing another uniform? LOL! Unless you are Shanahan, Allen or Snyder you do not know shit! | |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #92 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
If anything, the chart should weigh the economic impact of the top picks, thus reducing their point totals. As it is now, most teams operate counter intuitively to the chart. | |
| |
| | #93 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
That is pretty much what Doc Walker said. He said that Al missing this mini-camp is irrelevant. | |
| |
| | #94 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. I just get the feeling that AH will be traded on draft day. I imagine though that things may have to break right for the teams who want AH, Detroit and Tennessee. So like everything it's not etched in stone. Maybe it's a case of swapping 1sts w/ Tenn and them throwing in a 2nd this year and next or something along those lines. It's getting close so i think i'm just thinking of crazy scenarios. Draft day will come and we'll take Okung and we'll be done w/ it. |
| |
| | #95 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,753
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. The people in the business to sell newspapers or TV media are taking rumor and spinning it like it is fact and some of you guys are swallowing it like it is fact. Until Shanahan, Allen, Snyder or AH (or his agent) is quoted then it is fact. If snake oil salesmen like La Canforna and his rumor mongering buddies say it, it is not fact...it is rumor....until it happens. |
| |
| | #96 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 33
Posts: 14,884
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
![]() Not the people wanting him to stay...the whiners are the ones saying he should go.
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster | |
| |
| | #97 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. |
| |
| | #98 |
| What will Shanny do this offseason? Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,924
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. I think AH is nothing more than a chip to build this team at this point. Whether he wants to be here or not he is being used to build the roster. I think the redskins will send him to Detroit for their second and something else. They will then draft okung and we will move down using suh as the ammunition and still draft Williams. We will pick up a 3rd in moving down giving us a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and a 7th.
__________________ Let's win games now...PLEASE |
| |
| | #99 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 33
Posts: 14,884
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster | |
| |
| | #100 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 41
Posts: 2,643
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Could be. IMO It seems that when it's a straight pick for picks trade in that years draft it comes out somewhat close to the chart most times. When players or even future year picks are inserted into a deal it tends to change everything. It seemed like NY moved up for Sanchez for next to nothing last year in my eyes just becasue Mangenus put some over-inflated value on his former Jet players.
__________________ Section 115 Row 23 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” http://victorybeer.com/ |
| |
| | #101 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 48
Posts: 2,917
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Smart teams like New England stockpile 2nd round picks, because that's where real value is. Considering the ridiculous rookie slotting system of 1st round contracts, Suh and G. McCoy will make guaranteed money comparable to the obscene amount that we threw at Haynesworth. I really hope that the next CBA limits rookie pay in favor of proven veterans. Let a player prove it on the field before he can break the bank. |
| |
| | #102 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. I just don't get it. I do know you can't have it two ways. Either M.Shanahan is telling the truth or he's not. Everyone is quick to point out that Shanahan said "T.O. is not in the Redskins plans." Meaning we will not be picking up T.O., but don't hesitate to question the fact that Shanahan said AH is a Redskin and is contracted and will remain a Redskin. If Shanahan is telling the truth about T.O. then the obvious is also true...AH will not be traded. Unless Shanahan is lying which means he could be lying about T.O. also. which is it? |
| |
| | #103 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 43
Posts: 2,975
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
I ain't trying to hate buttttt hell yeah give the money to the proven Vet. | |
| |
| | #104 | |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Quote:
TO is a free agent. No need to smoke screen or lie. Just sign him...or not. AH, on the other hand, may be traded with draft implications. Therefore a smokescreen or lie may be appropriate.
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. | |
| |
| | #105 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
| Re: AH trade II La Canfora insists AH is indeed on the trading block. Maybe the Viks in play or should I say "hot pursuit" for fat albert.... Vikings in "hot pursuit" of Haynesworth Posted by Michael David Smith on April 22, 2010 5:12 PM ET One of the more intriguing draft rumors floating around today involves a new team that may have an interest in acquiring Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth: The Minnesota Vikings. A league source told PFT that the Vikings are in "hot pursuit" of Haynesworth. The rumor we heard lines up with something Judd Zulgad of the Star Tribune wrote today, indicating ESPN's John Clayton had mentioned that the Vikings had contacted the Redskins about Haynesworth. Although Redskins coach Mike Shanahan has said there have been no Haynesworth trade talks, most people believe that Haynesworth would be available. Haynesworth would seem to be a better fit in the Vikings' 4-3 defense than in the new 3-4 that the Redskins are installing. In Minnesota, Haynesworth would join a defensive line that already has defensive tackles Kevin Williams and Pat Williams, both of whom are still potentially facing four-game suspensions over a 2008 positive test for a prescription diuretic.
__________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |