![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland It wasn't today, I think it was last week. I downloaded the podcast. Both Mikes were talking about that JC may or may not be a starting QB in the league, but they felt they had not seen JC in a situation where he was allowed to proof that. I don't know if I'd go this far though, but I do feel that he needed to go elsewhere to get a 2nd chance. Quote:
I think folks here make a good point, Gibbs did trade up to get JC, so there must have been something about him that they like. But, I do also believe that Gibbs wasn't into developing a young QB. So it is curious to see where did that decision to get Campbell came from.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Good news: Great at intermediate passes. Bad news: Inconsistent with the quick slant. Also has had miscommunications with his top WR(he throws the ball one way and the receiver goes another way).
__________________ Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Did they say that stuff about Rodgers and Snyder though?
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland No, the Rodgers thing was more of my speculation from rumors that I don't remember now where I heard them from. Although I believe they said something along the lines of Campbell falling to the Redskins.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Yeah I don't think they were ever targeting Rodgers, no one expected him to fall to just one pick above Campbell. Would have been very interesting if we had moved up to take him though
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,812
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland i agree. rogders also doesnt seem like the kind of QB Gibbs would have gone after, either, but who knows. I still am somewhat shocked that we traded for that pick so far in advance, as opposed to when Denver was on the clock. i mean, what if Rodgers and Cambpell had both been taken by 25? I wonder if Plan A was to trade both #1s to move up and select alex smith or braylon edwards.
__________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Quote:
There were many excuses, one was made that we had no 2nd receiver to take the pressure off of Moss. Another was that Saunders offense was to complicated. Personally, I think wilso hit the nail right on the head. | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Nice thread. You make a good point about not being able to sort through all of the perceived attributes from the real ones. Skins fans will certainly have that insight from seeing all his games. You came to the right place. The best insight I can give is that Campbell has a big arm, but lacks consistent deep accuracy, which pretty much neutralizes his big arm benefits. He is efficient and accurate in the intermediate pass game and is an asset in the short run, but as a standup, pocket QB not having the deep threat is an extreme liability. The past 3 years our deep threat WR, Moss, has used his veteran route-running skills and speed to have 3 & 4 steps ahead of a CB only to have deep balls sail out of bounds or over his head. On the field, Moss has been visibly frustrated by this and his numbers have been affected by not being able to connect on his most advantageous aspect, the deep ball. Bottom line...The 2 things most attributed to Campbell are his big arm and big character. Expect one to help and the other to hurt.
__________________ Redskinsly, _________Skinny Tee_________ |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 48
Posts: 2,917
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland The good news is that Campbell has the physical tools, is a diligent worker, and is committed to getting better. The bad news is that many of Campbell's turnovers seemed to come late, when a game winning drive was in order. I never got the feeling that he would develop into a great 2 minute QB. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland The good news is Jason Campbell's best years as a QB (if he's going to have any) are still ahead of him. The bad news is he was traded for a 4th round draft pick. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 269
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland thanks for a lot of good responses so far.... deadline is today, so if anyone else wants to chime in, do so within the next couple hours.... obviously the thread can stay open for discussion.
__________________ BUMS LOGIC all the muse unfit to print: original writings about music, film, tv. culture, humor, etc direct link to the stuff on BumsLogic.com written by me |
| | |
| | #27 |
| MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51
Posts: 10,438
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland good news- definitely LOOKS the part of an NFL quarterback bad news- doesn't play like an NFL quarterback
__________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Good News is that Campbell can learn any system. Bad News is that he can't play in every system. Good News is that Campbell will keep his mouth shut publicly about playing in a flawed offense Bad News is that Campbell will keep his mouth shut about playing in a flawed offense. Good News is that Campbell is a very hard worker. Always tries to stay later than everyone else, studying and working with coaches and trainers. He puts in the effort to be the best. Bad News is that Campbell thinks to much sometimes. He doesn't "just do it".
__________________ "And the Redskins went down there and manhandled them and they basically undressed them and now everybody's been lining up to get a piece of them." - John Riggins on the last game we played in Texas Stadium |
| | |
| | #29 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,656
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland Bad news: a lot of fans think he stinks Good news: most fans don't know what they are talking about |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 559
| Re: good news and bad news for Oakland I think Campbell is a first class person, but he can't think with a football in his hand. He loses sight of his receivers and often overlooks wide open guys who could keep the chains moving. Jason just takes too long to get rid of the ball and that's the main reason he gets sacked so much (if you overlook the bad offensive line). As many years as he's been in the NFL, he really hasn't realized his full potential yet. I'll root for him as a Raider, but I would rather have somebody else as QB for the Redskins. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |