Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2010, 01:55 PM   #16
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

(cough)Bryant(cough)

Whatever... I've moved on, it's time the team did also. He goes somewhere else and does well good for him and his new team.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-30-2010, 01:56 PM   #17
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

You have GOT to be kidding me.

Dude is cooked.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 01:57 PM   #18
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,571
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Just cut the guy already
Agree, time to move on.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 01:57 PM   #19
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 58
Posts: 863
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Cut!
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 01:57 PM   #20
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,640
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
(cough)Bryant(cough)

Whatever... I've moved on, it's time the team did also. He goes somewhere else and does well good for him and his new team.
Not sure that another injured WR is the answer here.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:01 PM   #21
Playmaker
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,910
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

(sigh) I had hopes (not high hopes, but hopes) that he would be a contributor this season especially after Kyle sought him out shortly after getting here and telling him that he thought he would be a weapon and looked forward to working with him. Bottom line is te kid is just freaking fragile!! I'd hate to say cut him and see him get healthy and produce somewhere else but at this point I'd be just as fine with a release as I would with an IR stint.
__________________
Challenge Greatness! Be A Leader! Make A Difference!
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:03 PM   #22
MVP
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,387
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Just cut the guy already
Agreed, unless we can get another teams conditional 6th round pick for him. I have no clue what he adds to our roster?
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:03 PM   #23
Playmaker
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 4,663
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
(cough)Bryant(cough)

Whatever... I've moved on, it's time the team did also. He goes somewhere else and does well good for him and his new team.
Agree with Matty, Bryant is not a real upgrade over what is here already.

And besides he is hurt as well.
__________________
Robert Griffin III welcome to the Washington Redskins!

Year 1 - NFC EAST Champions at 10-6

Year 2 - 3-10... Benched 14 weeks to late.....

Year 3 - Pure Awesomeness!!

http://site.fandangoracinginc.com/
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:04 PM   #24
MVP
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,387
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
(cough)Bryant(cough)

Whatever... I've moved on, it's time the team did also. He goes somewhere else and does well good for him and his new team.
We will rue the day Cinci took TO, but no need to pile up the mistakes and take bryant.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:04 PM   #25
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 62
Posts: 1,809
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Wasted 2nd round pick. Only Look-inna-my-eyes Vinnie would make three picks in the 2nd round, all on the receiving end. Moron!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:06 PM   #26
MVP
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,387
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by backrow View Post
Wasted 2nd round pick. Only Look-inna-my-eyes Vinnie would make three picks in the 2nd round, all on the receiving end. Moron!
Actually I still say that this was a good use of those picks (old debate I know). Look, we got a starting TE (having 2 is NOT a bad thing), a serviceable WR, and a Bust. If we had spread the positions around, maybe we get 3 busts the way Vinnie picked, but at least now we got some value out of the round.

Oh, and every team can point to wasted 2nd round picks in their draft history. 2nds are never a lock.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:09 PM   #27
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

WRs should be:

Moss, Galloway, Thomas, Armstrong, Banks, Austin.



I was unsure on keeping Kelly or cutting him and keeping Austin before...because of Kelly's potential...but now it's just time to let go of him. He's had a lot of chances.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:22 PM   #28
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Not sure that another injured WR is the answer here.
I would agree with you except Bryant has seen the field and performed atleast. I would imagine he will be 100% soon. All I'm saying is cut someone who can't see the field and bring in someone who can or has. Unless Austin performs big at the next game I foresee him on the PS.

Moss
AA
Galloway
Williams
Banks
Thomas

PS- Austin

I would put a lot of thought into either Galloway (age) or R.Williams possibly cutting and bringing in Bryant. We could get Bryant up to speed in 2 1/2 wks and if not he would only have to learn a few routes cause I'm sure Moss, AA, Thomas, and Banks could hold the fort down till he did get up to speed.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:28 PM   #29
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
We will rue the day Cinci took TO, but no need to pile up the mistakes and take bryant.
LOL. I look at it this way, I felt we needed a decent WR now if AA is that, good. I said we should have picked up T.O. and was laughed at, told Kelly would be the guy. ha ha. sorry. I like VJ but we would definitly be giving up draft pick or picks and who knows what else. Bryant is free other then whatever contract we sign him to. So in this case I feel the same way about Bryant as I did about T.O., people wanted Marshall but that would have taken draft picks from us so I went with T.O.

In this case VJ will cost us picks so I'd rather go with a player we can cut easily if need be with having to lose draft picks. Bryant is almost 100% and has been on the field before, unlike MK. Bring him in with a contract that has a clause in it in regards to acting a fool and see if he will shine in both Shanahan's offense. If not cut him and bump up Austin.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:29 PM   #30
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,640
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I would agree with you except Bryant has seen the field and performed atleast. I would imagine he will be 100% soon. All I'm saying is cut someone who can't see the field and bring in someone who can or has. Unless Austin performs big at the next game I foresee him on the PS.

Moss
AA
Galloway
Williams
Banks
Thomas

PS- Austin

I would put a lot of thought into either Galloway (age) or R.Williams possibly cutting and bringing in Bryant. We could get Bryant up to speed in 2 1/2 wks and if not he would only have to learn a few routes cause I'm sure Moss, AA, Thomas, and Banks could hold the fort down till he did get up to speed.
Bryant might have a chronic knee condition. Posted it in another thread this morning.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30954 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25