Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2010, 02:22 PM   #31
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Not sure that another injured WR is the answer here.
I would agree with you except Bryant has seen the field and performed atleast. I would imagine he will be 100% soon. All I'm saying is cut someone who can't see the field and bring in someone who can or has. Unless Austin performs big at the next game I foresee him on the PS.

Moss
AA
Galloway
Williams
Banks
Thomas

PS- Austin

I would put a lot of thought into either Galloway (age) or R.Williams possibly cutting and bringing in Bryant. We could get Bryant up to speed in 2 1/2 wks and if not he would only have to learn a few routes cause I'm sure Moss, AA, Thomas, and Banks could hold the fort down till he did get up to speed.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-30-2010, 02:28 PM   #32
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
We will rue the day Cinci took TO, but no need to pile up the mistakes and take bryant.
LOL. I look at it this way, I felt we needed a decent WR now if AA is that, good. I said we should have picked up T.O. and was laughed at, told Kelly would be the guy. ha ha. sorry. I like VJ but we would definitly be giving up draft pick or picks and who knows what else. Bryant is free other then whatever contract we sign him to. So in this case I feel the same way about Bryant as I did about T.O., people wanted Marshall but that would have taken draft picks from us so I went with T.O.

In this case VJ will cost us picks so I'd rather go with a player we can cut easily if need be with having to lose draft picks. Bryant is almost 100% and has been on the field before, unlike MK. Bring him in with a contract that has a clause in it in regards to acting a fool and see if he will shine in both Shanahan's offense. If not cut him and bump up Austin.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:29 PM   #33
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 85,185
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I would agree with you except Bryant has seen the field and performed atleast. I would imagine he will be 100% soon. All I'm saying is cut someone who can't see the field and bring in someone who can or has. Unless Austin performs big at the next game I foresee him on the PS.

Moss
AA
Galloway
Williams
Banks
Thomas

PS- Austin

I would put a lot of thought into either Galloway (age) or R.Williams possibly cutting and bringing in Bryant. We could get Bryant up to speed in 2 1/2 wks and if not he would only have to learn a few routes cause I'm sure Moss, AA, Thomas, and Banks could hold the fort down till he did get up to speed.
Bryant might have a chronic knee condition. Posted it in another thread this morning.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:33 PM   #34
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 12,623
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehard View Post
Man, is he diabetic?
????

Anyway, yeah, adios Malcolm. IR or the waiver wire.
__________________
Insert witty signature here
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:36 PM   #35
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Bryant might have a chronic knee condition. Posted it in another thread this morning.

Didn't see. sorry. Come on VJ. lol.

I doubt VJ happens either. The Chargers are not wanting VJ to be happy if they are not happy either so they are not letting any other teams talk to him.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:38 PM   #36
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 36
Posts: 5,829
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
????

Anyway, yeah, adios Malcolm. IR or the waiver wire.
Does Jay Cutler have these sort of injury problems? I don't think so.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:38 PM   #37
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,109
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Didn't see. sorry. Come on VJ. lol.

I doubt VJ happens either. The Chargers are not wanting VJ to be happy if they are not happy either so they are not letting any other teams talk to him.
Problem now is with Kelly unable to stay healthy and Thomas not really showing much this preseason, we have no leverage in any talks for Jackson.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:48 PM   #38
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,109
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

At this point, I'm guessing he'll be put on IR. I really thought he'd play and play well on Thursday and start the season at, at worst, our #4 WR. Tough to justify even that, at this point

Really, what we need is for someone to plant some weed in his car. He gets pulled over, caught with possession of marijuana, gets a 4 week suspension from Goodell, heals his hamstring, and he's back in time for the Packers in Week 5
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:50 PM   #39
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,458
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

What kind of car does he drive?
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:55 PM   #40
Playmaker
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 44
Posts: 4,986
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

So how does the PUP list work, did we have to designate that at the outset of camp and he can't participate until Week 6 or something? I hope in the next CBA they address this in the way of increased roster limits or a 8-9 game disabled list.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:57 PM   #41
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 9,634
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
At this point, I'm guessing he'll be put on IR. I really thought he'd play and play well on Thursday and start the season at, at worst, our #4 WR. Tough to justify even that, at this point

Really, what we need is for someone to plant some weed in his car. He gets pulled over, caught with possession of marijuana, gets a 4 week suspension from Goodell, heals his hamstring, and he's back in time for the Packers in Week 5
Insider thought process.....NO sustitute.....
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 02:59 PM   #42
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,109
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
So how does the PUP list work, did we have to designate that at the outset of camp and he can't participate until Week 6 or something? I hope in the next CBA they address this in the way of increased roster limits or a 8-9 game disabled list.
This should help

Clarifying NFL rules on the physically unable to perform (PUP) list - Houston Houston Texans | Examiner.com
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 03:11 PM   #43
Impact Rookie
 
tootergray34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

WHAT A TURD!

please CUT this fool already. He brings down the locker room. You'd think he was on a madden COVER with how much time he has spent HURT.
__________________
---HAIL!!!---
tootergray34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 03:26 PM   #44
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,942
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by tootergray34 View Post
WHAT A TURD!

please CUT this fool already. He brings down the locker room. You'd think he was on a madden COVER with how much time he has spent HURT.
IF anything he raises the hopes of guys on the bubble that need another spot to open up.

Also, I don't think being injury pron constitutes calling someone a fool.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 03:29 PM   #45
Impact Rookie
 
johno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southwest, DC
Posts: 599
re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

wanted him to do well, but its over. hopefully armstrong, banks, somebody, anybody steps the f up!
__________________
fight for old dc.
johno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29765 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25