Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2010, 11:57 PM   #46
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 9,097
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
dallas has no prayer in hell of winning sunday with or without haynesworth.

Httr
httr........
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
ďItís all the political correct idiots in America, thatís all it is. Itís got nothing to do with anything else.
-Mike Ditka
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-06-2010, 09:53 AM   #47
Special Teams
 
SCRedskinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 402
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Does anyone else suspect a motivational reason for all this negative publicity for AH? I mean the man is being ridiculed in public on a daily basis.

Gotta wonder which way this will go. I think he'll come into the 'Pokes game chewing nails looking to stomp on someone's head. On the other hand, all this noise might just shut him down completely...

We'll see Sunday -- can't wait!
SCRedskinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 09:59 AM   #48
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 9,503
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
The Albert smear campaign continues - NFC East Blog - ESPN

I tend to agree with this article, why not just release the guy and move on with a clean slate?
They're not going to pay the guy 32 mil for one year and let him walk. Not gonna happen. He's playing here or no where.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 09:59 AM   #49
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,593
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCRedskinsFan View Post
Does anyone else suspect a motivational reason for all this negative publicity for AH? I mean the man is being ridiculed in public on a daily basis.

Gotta wonder which way this will go. I think he'll come into the 'Pokes game chewing nails looking to stomp on someone's head. On the other hand, all this noise might just shut him down completely...

We'll see Sunday -- can't wait!
Gawd, not again!
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 10:05 AM   #50
Impact Rookie
 
ethat001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 721
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

I personally think Shanny has got to let up. This has gone on the entire preseason, and he's proven a point. Haynesworth is supposedly still one of our best defensive players. We KNOW he'd play hard if he's given the starting role.

Just like someone has said, this is strangely very similar to the treatment of Lavar Arrington. A puzzling year where a good player was benched because of clashes with coaches / lack of commitment to the schemes.

I figured once they were joking with each other, they'd let bygones be bygones.
ethat001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 11:17 AM   #51
Special Teams
 
SCRedskinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 402
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Gawd, not again!
Sorry Sandtrap -- nothing personal.
SCRedskinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 11:26 AM   #52
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,817
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
They're not going to pay the guy 32 mil for one year and let him walk. Not gonna happen. He's playing here or no where.
So I guess they'd rather just continue with this soap opera and pay the guy to ride the pine?

Doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If he's not part of their plans I really wish they would just move on and cut him loose.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 02:30 PM   #53
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,075
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
So I guess they'd rather just continue with this soap opera and pay the guy to ride the pine?

Doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If he's not part of their plans I really wish they would just move on and cut him loose.
This is why I put this mess more on the team. Not that I'm defending Haynesworth at all, he deserves all that he has gotten. But, if Mike Shanahan wants to continue to stick it to the guy, and prove a point he proved several weeks ago, just cut the guy loose and cut your loses. We could have be done and over with a long time ago if they had traded him or just release him.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 02:56 PM   #54
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 9,503
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
So I guess they'd rather just continue with this soap opera and pay the guy to ride the pine?

Doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If he's not part of their plans I really wish they would just move on and cut him loose.
Maybe they're looking to get a return on their investment. Letting him walk isn't the smart business move. Yeah I'd like to get rid of this malcontent but it's not my money. If I owned the team he wouldn't be going anywhere so I can understand the front office' position.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 02:59 PM   #55
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,075
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Maybe they're looking to get a return on their investment. Letting him walk isn't the smart business move. Yeah I'd like to get rid of this malcontent but it's not my money. If I owned the team he wouldn't be going anywhere so I can understand the front office' position.
Trading him or cutting him would get rid of this soap opera. I don't understand why Shanahan insist on making this an issue. At this point it's all on them.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 03:01 PM   #56
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 49
Posts: 4,495
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Old FAT AL is just a POS. I had one of my boys that lives in the DC/MD area at the house this am. One of his best friends lives in the same community with FAT AL for whatever its worth he was stating that FAT AL is on the boat drinking with his boys creating havoc all hours of the night and he was a 100% POS in the community where they live.

For some reason it came as no surprise. At this point I really can't wait till this cancer is run outta this town.

RI-

Posted at 2:34 PM ET, 09/ 6/2010

Defensive lineman Albert Haynesworth was not taking any snaps with the starters. As the team went through its nickel packages, it appeared that Haynesworth had been bumped from first to second string.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 03:02 PM   #57
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 9,503
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
This is why I put this mess more on the team. Not that I'm defending Haynesworth at all, he deserves all that he has gotten. But, if Mike Shanahan wants to continue to stick it to the guy, and prove a point he proved several weeks ago, just cut the guy loose and cut your loses. We could have be done and over with a long time ago if they had traded him or just release him.


His value is at an all time low and everyone knows it. Detroit has a terrible defense and they didn't even want the guy. Jim Swartz knows he's a big pain in the ass first hand. If they're not taking him then who else would?? Right now the only thing to do is keep him.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 03:08 PM   #58
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,104
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Haynesworth expected to play, but probably won't play much | ProFootballTalk.com
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 03:09 PM   #59
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,075
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
[/B]

His value is at an all time low and everyone knows it. Detroit has a terrible defense and they didn't even want the guy. Jim Swartz knows he's a big pain in the ass first hand. If they're not taking him then who else would?? Right now the only thing to do is keep him.
During the draft it seems that our asking price was too high for a trade. Jim Schwartz already has a dominant DT in Suh, so no need to get AH.

I don't mind keeping him, but at this point the team needs to figure out a way to get the most out of him, and they are not doing that. If this keeps going, the team will be force to cut their loses and release him.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 06:43 PM   #60
Pro Bowl
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,122
Re: Haynesworth was "awful" (WP) - may not start against Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Trading him or cutting him would get rid of this soap opera. I don't understand why Shanahan insist on making this an issue. At this point it's all on them.
Becuase this is what the Owners want ,this is what other players want .....it was talked about before, BA has wrecked it for every player who ever thought they would get a contract like his.Shanahan is sending a message and from his silence ...Dan Snyder fully agrees.
Giantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.34846 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25