Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


(Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2010, 08:42 AM   #121
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

What did TJ do last night? 1 catch? Yeah I know he just signed there, just saying.

Boldin was the one that impressed me. He's a beast, wish we could have landed him somehow.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-14-2010, 09:08 AM   #122
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,636
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
What did TJ do last night? 1 catch? Yeah I know he just signed there, just saying.

Boldin was the one that impressed me. He's a beast, wish we could have landed him somehow.

I guess he did only have one catch, he seemed open quit a bit to me. IDK I am just frustrated with our group of WR's.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:11 AM   #123
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I'm not sure we can fairly judge our WRs offer until McNabb gets up to speed in the offense.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:43 AM   #124
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,506
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
after watching TJ play last night, I say that was a whiff on Bruce and company not signing that guy. Pisses me off!
Once the Ravens came into the picture there wasn't much we could do. TJ was already being paid and compared to the Skins the Ravens were a much more viable competitor.
__________________
6.6710−11 m3 kg−1 s−2

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:46 AM   #125
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

So good you had to post it twice eh
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:55 AM   #126
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Once the Ravens came into the picture there wasn't much we could do. TJ was already being paid and compared to the Skins the Ravens were a much more viable competitor.
At this stage of his career TJ was also looking for the best opportunity to perhaps win a super bowl. Consumed with the feeling the Ravens situation offered him a better chance at accomplishing that goal, his choice was easy.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:56 AM   #127
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,506
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
So good you had to post it twice eh
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
__________________
6.6710−11 m3 kg−1 s−2

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:31 AM   #128
MVP
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,494
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I wonder if the chance to go against Cincy twice a year had something to do with the decision. In the end, TJ could choose whoever he wanted and still get a top dollar salary, nice situation to be in no matter what your line of work
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:36 AM   #129
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,800
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I wonder if the chance to go against Cincy twice a year had something to do with the decision. In the end, TJ could choose whoever he wanted and still get a top dollar salary, nice situation to be in no matter what your line of work
Well, he was going to get top dollar salary no matter where he landed courtesy of the Seahawks. I think you are right, he prob wanted to go against Cincy twice a year, and I'm sure experts picking the Ravens to go to the SB went into that decision.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:39 AM   #130
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 34
Posts: 9,859
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
What did TJ do last night? 1 catch? Yeah I know he just signed there, just saying.

Boldin was the one that impressed me. He's a beast, wish we could have landed him somehow.
He got that pass interference call in the end zone that resulted in the TD. It was a weak call but it counted.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 11:04 AM   #131
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,636
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
He got that pass interference call in the end zone that resulted in the TD. It was a weak call but it counted.

IMO as good as a catch; just like Rak's holding plenty. If your talent is good enough to draw penalty and it helps move the ball or allows your team to win that is talent and a accommodate in this NFL (sadly).
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 11:41 AM   #132
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,099
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

The offense and passing game were imo out of sync Sunday night, both from an execution and gameplanning standpoint.
I though the instances of confusion and resulting wasted time outs were evidence of this.
But, that's gonna happen with so much 'newness' on the offense.
So although the passing game didn't look sharp they will get better.
Also, we played a very good defense last night, it reminds me of the start the Texans offense had against the Jets last year.

Galloway was only targeted once and he was open on a deep comeback route but McNabb was getting pressured, (it would be a tough throw to make for any QB).
Galloway could have been open all day for all we know.

Armstrong had imo a bad game he was targeted 5 times (2 in the RZ) and had 1 catch.
I recall McNabb(under duress i think) threw a bounce pass on crossing route where Armstrong was open.
And Armstrong had a chance on 2 well thrown stutter fade routes.

I think the coaching staff showed they had faith in him by targeting him 5 times and don't think they would or should give up on him after 1 game.

Roydell was targeted once on 3rd down late in the game and was open but McNabb (under duress) missed him with another bounce pass.

Devin Thomas was an BEAST on Kick Return and i value his contributions there as more valueable then trying him out on offense when we already know that the coaching staff don't consider him as one of the top 4 WR options on this team.

I wouldn't mind seeing him on specfic designed plays just for him-like that screen to Moss, I would love to see wild child catch a couple screens and run a couple of 9 routes.
But start opposite Moss nah i'll pass.

I want to see more Fred Davis though.
Not 1 target for him the whole game and very few double TEs passing sets.
__________________
No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 11:44 AM   #133
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 34
Posts: 9,859
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
IMO as good as a catch; just like Rak's holding plenty. If your talent is good enough to draw penalty and it helps move the ball or allows your team to win that is talent and a accommodate in this NFL (sadly).

Absolutely...teams like the Pats and Colts toss the ball up knowing full well that it will be either caught or result in an interference penalty.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 12:16 PM   #134
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,509
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
A Dirtbag classic.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 12:18 PM   #135
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,131
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
Son, you need to put the keyboard down and step away

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31597 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25