Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: Who gets your game ball for the Skins 16-13 win over the Pack?
McNabb 15 13.64%
Landry 75 68.18%
Armstrong 16 14.55%
Moss 1 0.91%
Cooley 0 0%
Smith 0 0%
Other 3 2.73%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2010, 01:00 PM   #91
Gamebreaker
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 13,444
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
I am far from impressed with our CBs...they play too deep and you can pretty much get all the underneath stuff at will the first two downs on them.
I dont know what CBs impress you then...Charles Woodson? He got made to look like a b*tch most of the day. Macklin and Jackson, shut down...Jennings and Driver (IMO better than the Philly Kids), shut down. Your not impressed?

Sounds like from your comments its more scheme than play, Haslett has them playing deep
__________________
“Nobody’s going to be handed a job; not my standpoint, and I know Jay feels that way and I know Bruce feels the same way. You have to earn it. That’s what the NFL is about. Prove to me that you deserve to be on the field,’ and that’s the way it has to be in the NFL.”- McC
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-11-2010, 01:07 PM   #92
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 3,105
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
Look at the replay - Donovan's throw led Moss to the sideline. His first job is to catch it cleanly and get two feet down. Perhaps if the throw was delivered more upfield, Moss would've had more room to stay inbounds. That was a huge 3rd down conversion that started the comeback, so I have no problem with Moss on that play.
I've seen it a few times, it's not like he's got to drag his feet to stay in on that play. It's not a huge issue for me, I just would have liked to see a little more effort. The throw did lead him out, but it looked he took about 3 steps before he got there, if he didn't I know he didn't have to break his stride to stay in, which makes me think, he should have tried to make a cut.

Last edited by jdlea; 10-11-2010 at 02:04 PM.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 01:13 PM   #93
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
I dont know what CBs impress you then...Charles Woodson? He got made to look like a b*tch most of the day. Macklin and Jackson, shut down...Jennings and Driver (IMO better than the Philly Kids), shut down. Your not impressed?

Sounds like from your comments its more scheme than play, Haslett has them playing deep
We are still the second worst passing defense this year. It is the scheme and perhaps the players getting use to it. The front 7 needs to do a better job too.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 01:20 PM   #94
Special Teams
 
aceinthehouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Springfield,Missouri
Posts: 463
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Gano should be on this list as well...but I chose Mcnabb
__________________
The 1991 Redskins team,is the greatest team of all time. Their average margin of victory is the greatest of all Superbowl winning teams! HTTR!!
aceinthehouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 09:18 PM   #95
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

There were so many plays that set them up for the win. Landry's INT, Cooley's 30-yard catch, and Gano's coolness. Alexander and Wilson made a lot of plays beforehand. Moore is a pure coverage FS.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 10:06 AM   #96
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 85,528
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Game Balls, Gassers and Observations: Redskins 16, Packers 13 (OT) - Redskins Journal

Campbell does a nice job with these weekly breakdowns.

Don't agree on the Jarmon "helmet to helmet" though. I've seen the replay a half dozen times now and I don't see where he led with the helmet, at least not to the degree where it should have been flagged. Did anyone see it that can point it out to me?? Maybe a different angle would help, I've only see the replay from the endzone cam.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 10:38 AM   #97
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Game Balls, Gassers and Observations: Redskins 16, Packers 13 (OT) - Redskins Journal

Campbell does a nice job with these weekly breakdowns.

Don't agree on the Jarmon "helmet to helmet" though. I've seen the replay a half dozen times now and I don't see where he led with the helmet, at least not to the degree where it should have been flagged. Did anyone see it that can point it out to me?? Maybe a different angle would help, I've only see the replay from the endzone cam.
I'm with you, I thought that Jarmon did everything possible to avoid any kind of helmet-to-helmet or roughing penalty. I was impressed by Jarmon's discipline, in fact.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 10:51 AM   #98
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,458
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

I said at the beginning of the season I thought the Redskins would have one of the better secondaries in the league and I still stand by that. I think if you look at stats alone, you'd probably come away with the only logical conclusion that we suck. But if you look at individual play, which has been even for the most part save a few plays, the physical play across the board (remember it was Hall and Moore that knocked Vick out, not Landry), we've shut down some notable WR tandems so far, and we're doing well in the turnover category.

Also, Kareem Moore has quitely (or not so quietly) asserted himself as the unquestioned starter at safety. No doubt, he's an upgrade over Horton and Doughty.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2010, 08:50 AM   #99
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

I voted Landry, but TBH, I didn't see a game ball at all last night.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2010, 08:53 AM   #100
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins vs. Packers - POSITIVES!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
I voted Landry, but TBH, I didn't see a game ball at all last night.
SS please remove, wrong thread.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26939 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25