![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #121 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 43
Posts: 2,978
| Re: sam bradford Quote:
I think I heard a rumor like that our 1st & A Hole for the lambs 1st last year. OH well I like what were doing now, can't cry over spilt milk. | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #122 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 36
Posts: 7,799
| Re: sam bradford Quote:
I still remember when Czab ask Mark Brunell if he would bench himself for the better of the team on CSN. Classic.
__________________ Ready for the Draft. | |
| | |
| | #123 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: sam bradford You would think the next Peyton Manning would be better then Colt McCoy. Not saying that Bradford isn't gonna be a good QB but you would think that people would either temper the Peyton Manning or start mentioning McCoy in the same ligth.
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole |
| | |
| | #124 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
| Re: sam bradford No hate for mccoy here. I'm just going to bring this tread back up in 3 years when bradford is a superstar. |
| | |
| | #125 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,594
| Re: sam bradford That's what I say, but again this is what I heard on the radio the other day.
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC |
| | |
| | #126 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: sam bradford Quote:
"nobody in their right mind thinks McCoy is even close to Bradford" Was a bit off? Unless you think the Football Outsiders stats and the TQBR aren't in their right minds?
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole | |
| | |
| | #127 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 59
| Re: sam bradford Eli Manning and Matt Schaub are both franchise quarterbacks, and both surely better than Joe Flacco. |
| | |
| | #128 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,996
| Re: sam bradford Quote:
I wouldn't say Franchise QB's for Schaub he hasn't even made a Playoff appearance yet.. Flacco is JC imo
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker | |
| | |
| | #129 | |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,958
| Re: sam bradford Quote:
Schuab fine but Eli? Thats just good old fashion hatting.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President | |
| | |
| | #130 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 59
| Re: sam bradford I would take Eli Manning over Flacco any day....look at Flacco's playoff figures, I don't think they're good. But then again, I'd take Rex Grossman over Flacco also. Rex is the man, the savior of D.C. He's going to surpass Brad Johnson's numbers of the '99 season when the Redskins had the 2nd best offense in the NFL. |
| | |
| | #131 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 59
| Re: sam bradford It's funny we probably could have drafted Rex Grossman and Jabar Gaffney instead of Patrick Ramsey and Taylor Jacobs in '02 and '03. The Redskins management has really been ridiculous season after season, but I believe this is really the turn of the Redskins and it will be led by Rex Grossman. I remember wishing we hadn't drafted Patrick Ramsey so we would be going after Grossman the next draft. I bet Spurrier didn't want to draft Ramsey, and if he had the chance to get Grossman I bet his offense would have been a lot more dynamic. Grossman led the Bears to the super bowl his first season as a starter. I really look at the rest of the NFL for being pretty stupid for not getting this guy, basically because I know he can play and the Redskins are going to surprise the NFL. The Redskins receiving core is actually good too even though it didn't look that way a month ago. I really like how Terrence Austin has been looking. |
| | |
| | #132 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: sam bradford ???
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole |
| | |
| | #133 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 59
| Re: sam bradford I was responding to like the beginning of this post lol |
| | |
| | #134 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area
Posts: 3,961
| Re: sam bradford Eli is overrated. He had the one SB and it will be all downhill from there. He ahs a nasty tendency to throw INTs when the game is on the line or real close. Favre started doing this when he hit the big 36. How old is Eli? |
| | |
| | #135 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 608
| Re: sam bradford Favre always threw picks in big/any moments. For some reason though he was always given a pass by the media on this, when he threw a stupid pick it was because he was a "gun slinger" |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |