Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Sean Taylor at LB?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2004, 08:34 PM   #1
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,653
Sean Taylor at LB?

I was watching the Redskins Report on the local NBC affiliate earlier tonight and I think I heard Sonny Jurgensen say that his game plan for the Philly game would be to have ST substitute for another linebacker (Marshall?) and spy on McNabb the entire game and have someone else (Franz?) play safety tomorrow.

Did anyone else hear this? Did I hear this right? What do you guys think of that strategy?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-11-2004, 08:36 PM   #2
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,220
Yep, I saw that also. I think it would be great, but don't run it all game. I remember early in the season they put LaVar at safety one play, they moved guys around. That has to be confusing as hell. It's definitely worth experimenting!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 09:15 PM   #3
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
i'd rather someone else spy on mcnugget, i like sean playing in his regular spot so he can make plays all over the field for us
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 09:16 PM   #4
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
Sean tayler will be a spy and linebacker on someplays. Thats the beaty of GW system. But Tayler is too good in coverage not the use that too. He'll do it all tomorrow night. Part of the reason why Sean Tayler is quickly becoming one of my favorite Redskins. Did you see him hit TO in the mouth last game. God i love that guy.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 09:58 PM   #5
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
ST weighs more than MIDDLE linebacker Mike Peterson of the Jaguars. I'm sure he could play linebacker, but I prefer to see him at safety where he has more of an opportunity to be a ballhawk.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 10:10 PM   #6
Special Teams
 
heybigstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 30
Posts: 369
I like it and i dont like at the same time ... one way i dont like it is because of familiarity , ST has never tried this before .... i also dont like not having him at FS when McNabb is throwing it downfield ... i do like the potential, of ST frustrating McNabb on the right plays, forcing a sack or a turn over......
__________________
Hail to the Redskins.
heybigstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 10:20 PM   #7
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,220
Isn't Sean Taylor nearly the same build as LT?
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 11:01 PM   #8
Special Teams
 
Winskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wheaton, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 282
In some situations this might a really good way of putting a good coverage man on Westbrook.
__________________
The Skins will make the Cowboys their woman...and they're gonna enjoy it!
Winskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 11:03 PM   #9
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,220
Greg Williams seems to understand what to do always. He's my rushmore!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2004, 11:33 PM   #10
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal
Isn't Sean Taylor nearly the same build as LT?
Lt was 6-3 250, about the same size as Lavar. Tayler isn't quite that big.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2004, 12:13 AM   #11
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins
i'd rather someone else spy on mcnugget, i like sean playing in his regular spot so he can make plays all over the field for us
LOL. McNugget. That's great!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2004, 01:57 AM   #12
Special Teams
 
heybigstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 30
Posts: 369
the hurricane will have the spot light on Sunday Night - biggest game of the season....
__________________
Hail to the Redskins.
heybigstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2004, 08:19 AM   #13
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 45
Posts: 1,587
I'm sure that WIlliams has watched the game film from the last meeting and has devised some way to try to frustrate McWhatsHisName into making some bad throws. I think that for us to win this game, either special teams or defense has to score.

What I hope is that what we saw last week is classic Gibbs football. What I mean is adjustment to the team we are playing. If Gibbs can look at the game film against Philly and see what worked and what didn't, he should be able to string together a few more first downs. That, combined with fewer penalties could have won us the last game. I think that the birds could be in for a hard time tonight.:smashfrea
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2004, 10:25 AM   #14
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,220
Guys - we owned McNabb in the first half. I really think we should have gone up by 10 points in the first half. If we can play the way we played last game only keep our defense off the field a bit longer and have some actual drives then we'll be fine!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2004, 10:35 AM   #15
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 28
Posts: 7,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal
Guys - we owned McNabb in the first half. I really think we should have gone up by 10 points in the first half. If we can play the way we played last game only keep our defense off the field a bit longer and have some actual drives then we'll be fine!

Seriously, that game was no where near a 28-6 asskicking. We were very mcuh in that game. The final score proboly should have been like 20-14, but we couldnt score on offense and then they punched in another TD to be jackasses. If we can sustain any type of offense like we did last week, I think were gonna put up one hell of a game.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26570 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25