![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #286 | |
| Playmaker ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
| Re: Super Bowl XLV Quote:
SB participants on losing teams include Stan Humphries, Neal O'Donnell, Earl Morrall, Craig Morton, Billy Kilmer, Vince Ferragamo, David Woodley, Tony Eason, Chris Chandler, Kerry Collins and Rich Gannon.
__________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #287 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: Super Bowl XLV The Giants didn't have much of a QB when they beat the Pats a few years ago...or the Bills in XXV. (Jeff Hostettler) Eli was garbage until the last 4 games of that season. Finished the year with 20 TDs, 23 INTs. 56% comp rate. Nice 25 INTs this season too. ![]() Point is, Difer is not the only mediocre QB to win a SB. Brad Johnson won a QB too...and even Mark Rypien's SB-winning season was an exceptional season in his career. He never matched those amazing numbers again. It happens a little more often than people mention. Of course, there are always star QBs who win in bunches (Montana, Bradshaw, Brady) who fill up the list of SB-winning QBs, making it APPEAR that a star QB is a necessity to win it all. Most of those QBs also have dominant defenses on their sideline too, as do the Dilfers of the history books.
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
| | |
| | #288 |
| Thank You, Sean. ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 27
Posts: 7,360
| Re: Super Bowl XLV This may have been hit somewhere else, but I just was thinking about it today and wanted to pass along: How close do you think Aaron Rodgers was to being a Redskin? The Packers selected him one spot ahead of where we took Jason Campbell, and I mean I'm sure there was a lot of debate for Green Bay as to weather to take him or not... I just thought it was kind of interesting. I know Campblel was Gibbs guy, but Rodgers was also projected to be long gone... just something I was thinking about..... Also looking through that draft board... was Rogers (Carlos) the best player taken in the top 10? Maybe Antrelle Rolle, but I think otherwise he actually might be. Thats a pretty weak top 10 for 2005
__________________ #21 |
| | |
| | #289 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
| Re: Super Bowl XLV Quote:
Mind you Gmanc those are not my words, but the writer does make some indisputable points.
__________________ A revolution is coming and it will be televised. Last edited by Longtimefan; 02-11-2011 at 07:08 PM. | |
| | |
| | #290 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
| Re: Super Bowl XLV Like a seed in soil without much nutrients, Aaron Rodgers have not developed and produced as well as he did in Green Bay. Sure, he would have developed some, but not to his maximum capabilities.
__________________ Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |