![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #196 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 276
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote: The best chance for both parties to continue to have success is for McNabb to stay here. I just don't think Kyle or Donovan can have some sort of "meet-me-half-way" miracle moment to salvage things. | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #197 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,739
| I'm sure Mike likes him as a person, but he's clearly not a fan of him as a QB. |
| | |
| | #198 |
| The Bluths ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,105
| Re: Where will McNabb land? How about the Titans now that Collins has retired
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #199 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
| Re: Where will McNabb land? The Titans may just wait until the Redskins have to release McNabb to try and pick him up. They are not known for absorbing overpaid players…. well until Randy Moss.
__________________ A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
| | |
| | #200 |
| Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 50
Posts: 7,166
| Re: Where will McNabb land? D McNabb + AH for a 3rd and 6th rounder - or something of that ilk.
__________________ My Little Pony: Friendship is magic? or ... a repressive matriarchal society where individuals' roles are defined by their immutable physical characteristics and governance is reserved for those who demonstrate the genetic purity of the pony master race? |
| | |
| | #201 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
Allen could just be blowing smoke, but for now I'm going to take him at his words.
__________________ A revolution is coming and it will be televised. | |
| | |
| | #202 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
If after two seasons the franchise isn't heading in a positive direction, I have no earthly idea what benefit bringing back the coaching staff would bring.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #203 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote: The bigger question is why does MS have to turn this thing around over night? Cerrato took 10 years to ruin this team and now whoever we bring in MUST turn this thing around over night? WTF? MS signed a 5 yr deal. In my opinion he has 5 yrs to get this thing fixed, or atleast get it heading into the right direction. If at the 5 yr mark the team is 75 to 100% better then resign MS and let him finish the job. I'm sooo tired of the DC media and fans expecting over night success. Use your brains.... if it took 10 yrs to screw this thing up its going to take more then 1 or 2 yrs to straighten this thing out. Hopefully we do better then 8-8, but if we end up 8-8 I'll accept that because there is a lot of work to do. 9-7 and or better would be nice. As long as they are showing improvement individually and as a team. | |
| | |
| | #204 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
Gotcha.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #205 | |
| MVP Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,179
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
I don't see what the problem is as long as steady improvement is being made to not only make this team better in the short term, but definitely in the long term as well. And so far, aside from the McNabb/Haynesworth bumps in the road, we're on the right track. But it definitely won't take 4 or 5 seasons to remake this team in Shanny's image. 3 seasons tops. Where we're at right now, I think we can be anywhere from a 6-10 to 9-7 team, which is still an improvement over last year and 2009. Like I said as long as improvement is being made. I'd rather sacrifice short term success for long term success if need be. | |
| | |
| | #206 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
SBXVII was saying five years min, based on no burden of improvement. And he was saying that as if Vinny Cerrato's acts here justifies not being critical of the guy that follows him. In other words, he was saying that 4 years of non-progress under Shanahan couldn't be Shanahan's fault, they'd be Cerrato's. I will leave it to you to determine the validity of such a claim. But thats what he was saying.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #207 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 38
Posts: 1,788
| Re: Where will McNabb land? I am guessing either Arizona, Minnesota are the top two. Arizona has all ready said they are going to be aggressive in going after a QB. My guess in McNabb will come cheaper than Colb. He lives and trains in Arizona during the offseason as well. They have some pieces out there, that with a decent QB they could win that division and host a playoff game. |
| | |
| | #208 | |
| MVP Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,179
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #209 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: Where will McNabb land? Quote:
This is not a playoff team, and everyone, including he media, the fans, the coaches and the owner need to realize that. It's going to take time. I'm ok with that as long as I don't see Redskins One flying all over the place to over pay other teams players. | |
| | |
| | #210 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: Where will McNabb land? IMO it has nothing to do with improvement record wise. The team needs to get younger and they're doing that. If we go 4-12 next year I'm ok with it. That would most likely mean the young guys are playing and getting valuable game experience. Going 6-10 with an old team really accomplised nothing. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |