![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #47 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #48 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
Sometimes I wish the media would just leave this type of stuff alone. It's really no ones business what kind of financial shape the guy is in. If he brought it up then fine, but I don't think that was the case cause I remember an article on Post.com. And whether he was broke or not, wouldn't most of us try and get as much $ as we could if we were in his shoes? Especially if you felt you were being low balled. I know I would. Bottom line is the guy is going to get a big raise and it's well deserved. | |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,469
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On I'm not in favor of Carlos moving on, unless of course his asking price is simply unrealistic. He's a good pass defender with an annoying habit of playing two games at once: Football and Hot Potato.
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
| | |
| | #50 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
The bottom line is that he wants more money, and while he's been a solid corner, he probably is not worth the money he is looking for. Unfortunately, Rogers and Hall compliment each other, and unless we get a suitable replacement, our CB play will be affected greatly. For the cafeteria fans out there, I strongly believe that the same would happen if Hall were to leave and we didn't find a suitable replacement to compliment Rogers. But I'm sure the cafeteria fans won't care about this and be ready for a season of D. Hall bitching sessions.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #51 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #52 | |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,102
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
It would be interesting though if we simply never reported on the salaries these players make.
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
| | |
| | #53 | ||||
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,102
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | ||||
| | |
| | #54 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Good point about Barnes SS. But do you really think he can replace Los? Barnes as a starting cb does worry me. He's a decent nickel guy, just don't think he's up to filling Los' shoes. I realize we haven't seen enough of him yet in that role yet. The coaches may have no choice. |
| | |
| | #55 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On You know I usually defend player and have defended CR before but... F....Carlos Rogers. See ya. |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 30
Posts: 8,058
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
You talk about targets which is a clever way of avoiding the question. I'm asking when 'Los was beat where it was a big play costing the skins the game. Targets are one thing, but big completions are another. Most of the completions on Carlos are short and stopped quickly. If he wants top CB money, then I understand letting him walk. I think his market price is much higher than fans here seem to think. I think he's a 15-20CB in my eyes. I understand if we let him go because of financial reasons, but I think we underestimate what he brings to the table.
__________________ Best. Player. Available. | |
| | |
| | #57 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Alabama
Posts: 83
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote: | |
| | |
| | #58 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 1,996
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Carlos is the least of the skins worries.
__________________ But you know the sun's settin' fast, and just like they say, nothing good ever lasts. |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On I think Rogers should go out and test the market. It also depends on the need. Say there are two teams out there who need a good CB. Good I say. Then Rogers might get them in a bidding war for his services. On top of that it also depends on what players of equal stats are getting in his position. Do I have a problem with Rogers? no. I look at it this way if you have a CB on one side who is a bit more of a risk taker and will try and jump the pass for an interception then you need another CB on the other side who is not a risk taker and plays the game safe. Because the FS will most likely need to roll towards the side with the risk taking CB to back him up in case he misses the interception. Otherwise you need to keep both Safeties back to help out the CB's if you have two risk takers. The two glaring problems with Rogers is he fails to make interceptions (big whoop) and he is known to bite on the first move. Rogers has had his share of WR's faking him out and getting yards. So though he's not bad, I wouldn't label him top 10. Matter of fact going to NFL.com and looking up players by position stats you might be supprised to see that 4 other Washington players rank before Rogers for 2010. Hall at #4, Doughty at #5, Landry at #16, and K.Moore at #40. The have Rogers ranked #54. Looking back Rogers rank for each yr: 2010- #54 2009- #76 2008- #48 2007- #93 2006- #20 2005- #58 These numbers however are not just CB's. It includes Safeties as well. Also I think part of the reason for the flux is because he might have been injured or was used differently. I don't mean to say he was used in a different position, I mean what he was asked to do in the GW, Blache, or Haslett's defense might be slightly different. In any event I see him as a middle of the road CB. I could be wrong though... Bleacherreport has him listed #10. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #60 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,208
| Re: Rogers Ready to Move On Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |