![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,126
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal I don't mind them re signing him and cutting McNabb but 2012 needs to be the year where we draft a Qb for the future. I think the FO thinks the same way, they think the 12 class is much stronger than 11 and I agree. Sorry but I want Andrew Luck in the worst way. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 | |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
Grossman's 2006 season he started every game and threw 23 TDs. His rating was great (73.9), but I don't think he was the worst QB to start a Super Bowl. Hell, was Doug Williams any better? I mean he played a phenomenal Super Bowl game for sure, but overall was he any better of a player than Rex Grossman? Doug Williams NFL & AFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com
__________________ Insert witty signature here | |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 278
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal It's going to take going 1-15 or 2-14 to get Andrew Luck. With our schedule we should still be able to fart out 5-6 wins, no matter who the quarterback is. So if you're hoping we suck hard enough to get Andrew Luck, you're probably going to end up disappointed. Especially because love it or hate it, they'll be looking to upgrade the team considerably through free agency. |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,885
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster | |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,613
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #36 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,184
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
DW was very clutch and didn't give games away with INTs. | |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Yes, DW over Rex any day. But back on topic; with this much cap space & flexibility will the team give in some on deals w/Rogers & Moss and pay them more? From what we've seen of Allen thus far, he's made value a big issue in contracts, so I would say no. |
| | |
| | #38 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,184
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Yeah I don't see Allen paying more than he feels someone is worth. If there's one thing he excels at it's keeping deals reasonable. |
| | |
| | #39 | |
| The Bluths ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,217
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
As I heard it this weekend FA Target #1 is Aubrayo Franklin. So that should be interesting
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 278
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal I don't think Buchanon stays. I think they like Barnes enough that they at least think that he can play nickel. They'll add another corner like a Jonathan Joseph or Ike Taylor; maybe not someone who is shutdown, but someone with a better track record. How many teams has Buchanon been on now? |
| | |
| | #41 |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,917
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal I'd like to point out that the team's advantageous position for the coming year was not by accident. Allen and company set the team up for success this offseason by structuring bonus money the way they did last year. They also anticipated that this would be a large free agent class. All that said, it doesn't mean they'll go on an indiscriminate spending spree, but it does mean they'll have a lot of players to choose from and will have the means to get the ones they do want. I'd also like to point out that there are real significant cap implications to releasing or trading Haynesworth. I think that makes it a real possibility that we sit on him for at least another season. |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #43 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8,403
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal |
| | |
| | #45 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 36
Posts: 7,907
| Re: ESPN: Teams that are helped/hurt by the new salary cap proposal Quote:
__________________ RG3 = Best QB in the East | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |