![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Go to the corner and think about what you've just done.
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Well that was three years ago. I agree that he didn't push Cooley...but I don't see this as a bad thing. I think this is a key year for him, b/c it may determine that the team will keep him and trade Cooley in the future.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout LOL. I just think its funny seeing people either wanting to trade Cooley or Davis. For the life of me I can't figure out why we can't keep both? Cooley is a HOFer and there is no reason to let him go, and Davis has (to me) equal talent so there is no reason to get rid of him either. Give them shift work..... every 2 or 3 plays change out, or better yet give each 2 quarters and mix them up.... whoever appears to be having the better day let the finish the 4th quarter. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,714
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout I'd prefer to keep Cooley & Davis too. Seems that all we hear every offseason now is this silly trade Cooley talk. He's only 29 and still very productive, no reason why he can't keep playing at a high level for another 4-5 seasons. Keep them both, and find a way to get Davis more involved. |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
That being said I think that Fred has a lot of ability that he doesn't get to show often enough. Hell even Cooley didn't get the same opportunities in the offense that he had previously. It's more about not really having much need for 2 pass catching TEs unless they want to split Davis or Cooley out wide more frequently. Why waste talent? It's better to get a pick from it rather than not get the potential out of the player. I'd love to keep both but I'd have to see them utilized a bit more, especially Davis.
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT | |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,753
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
He hasn't even had a single 1000 yard season or much less has he had a 10 TD season. | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
I think it's patently ridiculous that no offensive mind has figured out how to use two TEs at the same time to maximize the talent on our roster, but I just don't see it being any different this year.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout If we're willing to do that it's a good idea.
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,714
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
I'm not saying Cooley is a HOF player, too early to say either way. | |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,714
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |