Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Redskins Receivers Rotation

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2011, 09:02 PM   #181
Playmaker
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 4,594
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehard View Post
Fred Davis should be working with the WRs. Cooley, Paulsen, and Sellers can handle playing TEs.
Que?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-09-2011, 09:06 PM   #182
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,458
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Just saw on twitter if the Niles Paul ends up on the PS, there's little chance that he'd stay unclaimed.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 09:17 PM   #183
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 84,942
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Just saw on twitter if the Niles Paul ends up on the PS, there's little chance that he'd stay unclaimed.
Yeah, kinda depends on what he flashes during the preseason
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 09:24 PM   #184
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 84,942
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I just don't understand why they draft guys and then bring in older guys. If you have little or no intention of playing them then draft some freakin' o-linemen in the later rounds. This team is seriously obsessed with wr's. lol.
But then we'd have to cut the veteran OL
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2011, 09:42 PM   #185
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Just saw on twitter if the Niles Paul ends up on the PS, there's little chance that he'd stay unclaimed.
Hopefully that means he earns the #5 job. The dudes gonna be our offensive rookie of the year.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 04:07 AM   #186
Impact Rookie
 
Kindoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 920
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Assuming we keep 6... Moss, Gaffney, Armstrong, Hankerson, Austin & Banks is what's floating my boat right now.
__________________
RIP 21
Kindoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 04:53 AM   #187
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,497
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

WR who make 53 man roster.
1.Moss
2.Gaffney
3.Armstrong
4.Hankerson
5.Austin (SP)
6.Paul (SP)
7.Banks (KR/PR) if not put on IR
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam FlowersRedskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 08:42 AM   #188
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins89moss View Post
WR who make 53 man roster.
1.Moss
2.Gaffney
3.Armstrong
4.Hankerson
5.Austin (SP)
6.Paul (SP)
7.Banks (KR/PR) if not put on IR
No way we'd carry 7 Wrs and no way hankerson is higher than Austin
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 11:16 AM   #189
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 2,841
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Paul/Banks

Austin needs to be on the field as much as possible this year. That guy has top 2 potential not too far down the line.

Last edited by wilsowilso; 08-26-2011 at 11:19 AM.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 11:19 AM   #190
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 84,942
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:22 PM   #191
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

Im gonna switch out Banks with Stallworth and drop Hankerson down a notch. A injured Banks doesnt play special teams either. Unless Banks plays and doesnt swell up after the game next week i think he starts the year on the PUP list
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:28 PM   #192
MVP
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,471
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:49 PM   #193
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 84,942
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.
If Banks is healthy he's too valuable in the return game. Austin is a nice backup as a returner, but Banks is still the big play guy. Austin doesn't match him in that regard.

Paul hasn't shown us much in the passing game. John Keim has remarked that his route running at this point is still really a work in progress.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:51 PM   #194
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 84,942
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmpetert View Post
Im gonna switch out Banks with Stallworth and drop Hankerson down a notch. A injured Banks doesnt play special teams either. Unless Banks plays and doesnt swell up after the game next week i think he starts the year on the PUP list
He can't start on PUP. He would have needed to be on there at the start of camp.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:52 PM   #195
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,101
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)
This makes the most sense at this point assuming Banks is healthy
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29665 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25