Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Trade Clinton Portis

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2005, 04:45 PM   #16
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sterling, VA
Age: 29
Posts: 4,444
i was thinking the same way bozzy, portis just doesnt seem to fit this system right now, and ive always been high on betts. i dont know though, portis does have a huge contract and i doubt it would happen
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-02-2005, 05:18 PM   #17
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
This is just crazy talk, CRAZY!!!!
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:30 PM   #18
Special Teams
 
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queens Village, NY
Age: 35
Posts: 349
i think that you all must be smokin' we cant trade cp he's so explosive if only we had a line like denver than he would break those long runs , betts is not a homerun hitter. do you know hoe dangerous we would be if we had a o-line like denver with his long runs and our d with betts pounding away at the end of the game. we would be unstoppable so please stop this crazy talk you all just look silly making those statements.
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:36 PM   #19
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,765
I think Betts is a better fit for the system, but it's not going to help us finanically by getting rid of Clinton Portis. I think Betts should get more playing time next season, but Portis has helped us out quite a bit (1,300 + yards) and still gives us that added deminsion in our running game. It is good to know that at least for the next season or two, we should have a more than capable guy to step up should Portis get injured.
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:39 PM   #20
Impact Rookie
 
skins009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
Might i remind everyone that Betts run on minnosota, and everybody runs on vikings.
skins009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:42 PM   #21
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
1300+ yards on a offense that sucked this year, thats damn good , don't be fooled by 1 good game against a defense that sucks. portis is the man, he aint going nowere. i bet he runs for over 1500 yeards next season
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:43 PM   #22
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,765
Betts has been running pretty good, not just only against Minnesota. I will say he probably had his best game today.
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:51 PM   #23
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
but to talk about trading a guy they just got and who ran for over 1300 yards and wasn't even utilized the right way is rediculous
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 05:57 PM   #24
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
if portis would have played today he might have past 1500 yards on the season . he would have been the only player in the history of the nfl to run for 1500 three years in a row. would you all still be talking about trading him? ........ didn't think so.
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 06:06 PM   #25
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 51
Posts: 3,097
If Portis started this game he would have found his way to the bench, Bett's was hitting the holes hard not stopping and starting waiting for the red sea to part, as I said when we traded for Portis it was a bad trade because he is a system back, and if Bett's played in that denver system he would have 1500 yards every year, everything I said about this trade when it was happening about Bett's and Portis has come true, Bett's is a far better back for Gibb's system and Portis is exactly the opposite of what Gibb's need's in a back, Portis does not have the toughness or the body to run inside, a 50 million dollar waste, whatever Portis can do Bett's can do better, if they only listened to me, we would have traded Champ for pick's, we would have never traded for Brunell, and we would have a serious defensive line, and offensive line help as well, and I would have never given an outside LB unless he can rush the passer like LT a major contract like we gave Arrington, as we have seen give William's a LB with speed and he will make a football player out of him, those 3 player's are going to cripple our ability to strengthen the rest of our football team for year's to come!
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 06:28 PM   #26
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
i'll just have to respectfully disagree with you on the portis , betts issue. as far as lavar's contract, i don't think, at the time it was done, was a bad move. he had been selected to the probowl a few times and was clearly the best player we had on d. the skins wanted to make him a redskin for the rest of his career or at least close to it. if not for him getting injured this season who knows what kind of year he would have had.in closing i don't think the contracts of brunnel , portis and arrington cripple the skins ability to improve , i feel getting arrington back healthy, adjusting the offense a little bit to better suit portis and having brunnel as the backup qb strengthens the team
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 07:05 PM   #27
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 46
Posts: 1,587
Good news! We have Portis AND Betts AND Gibbs! That means that next year the backs will have to push each other for the starting job. Gibbs will play the best player no matter what they are getting paid. Portis is a great runner and an outstanding blocker. Did you see the block that Betts missed at the end of the game and Ramsey got sacked? These guys are both good for the Redskins. The way Gibbs runs the ball, I'm sure any running back on our team is going to get banged up and need back up. We now have depth!

Add Jansen, a center, and give Bugle and Gibbs another year and I bet the running game will be the envy of the league. :thumb:
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 07:18 PM   #28
Special Teams
 
Dirtbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Our Offensive line is the problem, people. It sucks. We need to overhaul it big-time, but if we do, we have the rest of the puzzle pieces to be great next year.
Dirtbag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 07:56 PM   #29
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 8,271
Quote:
Might i remind everyone that Betts run on minnosota, and everybody runs on vikings.
AMEN!

Portis is great, we just need to adapt a bit!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 08:32 PM   #30
Impact Rookie
 
Drift Reality's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoSkins!
Good news! We have Portis AND Betts AND Gibbs! :
That's exactly the way I would look at it - it is great to have two solid running backs, so lets just end talks about cutting or trading Portis now.
Drift Reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28645 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25