Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Portis for Larry Johnson

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2005, 11:09 AM   #16
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
There is no reason to trade Lavar Arrington nor Clinton Portis. Both are stars and when healthy, play like stars! Lavar is finally in a defense that suits his style and he just happened to sustain a hard injury to comeback with. Lets not send him up the river just yet!

The only players I think we could let go are Gardner and Morton....as far as bigger money deals!

Amen Skinsguy.....
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-03-2005, 11:33 AM   #17
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 9,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by djdunick
I heard an interesting rumor at the stadium yesterday that George Michael's of channel 4 is starting rumors of a Portis for Larry Johnson trade. Has anyone else heard that? Personally I think it would be terriffic. Johnson is more of the between the tackles back that Gibbs likes. Betts did a great job yesterday.

Clinton Portis is not a 'core Redskin' guy. He doesn't want to grind out the hard yards and doesn't have the heart to be on this team. He wants all the glory and only wants big plays not the '2 and 3 yard stuff' as he has stated in the past. What a mistake.
You sir are an idiot.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 12:58 PM   #18
Special Teams
 
djdunick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Age: 52
Posts: 141
FRPLJ,

So sad that you have to resort to name calling, it really shows off your low IQ.

If you have faith in Portis you must be smokin' crack. He can't get us a touchdown in the red zone and doesn't want to run for the hard yards. I've also heard that he has been doing a lot of improvisation. FRPLJ if you don't know what improvisation means go to www. websters.com

DJDunick
djdunick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:04 PM   #19
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by djdunick
FRPLJ,

So sad that you have to resort to name calling, it really shows off your low IQ.

If you have faith in Portis you must be smokin' crack. He can't get us a touchdown in the red zone and doesn't want to run for the hard yards. I've also heard that he has been doing a lot of improvisation. FRPLJ if you don't know what improvisation means go to www. websters.com

DJDunick
I must be a crackhead then.....I guess those 1300 yds he got were just given to him by the defenses.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:48 PM   #20
Special Teams
 
djdunick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Age: 52
Posts: 141
Redskin P,

How many touchdowns did Portis have, not many. One spectacular run on the first play from scrimmage. A bruising up the middle back is much more the style runner we need. Those 1,300 yards certainly weren't given to him he had an incredible number of carries.

With the game on the line in the 4th quarter and we're down at the 5 yard line I don't think Portis makes it in.
djdunick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:51 PM   #21
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
I hear where you coming from DJ, but part of the problem was the o-line. You can't blame Portis if he doesn't have any holes to run through..
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:57 PM   #22
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 3,087
Portis had 15 and 14 in his 2 seasons in Denver. I'm sure those weren't all from 20 yards out. He has to be doing something right.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:01 PM   #23
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,219
This talk of Portis not running hard, not gaining the tough yards, etc., is just nonsense.

He had a ton of carries this year behind a very average offensive line and he held up very well under the circumstances.

How many games did he have with 30+ carries?

He's a tough guy for someone his size and I'm really confused over these claims that he lacks heart and determination.

If this "trade Portis" talk is going to last all offseason I think I just might shoot myself.
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:06 PM   #24
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
This talk of Portis not running hard, not gaining the tough yards, etc., is just nonsense.

He had a ton of carries this year behind a very average offensive line and he held up very well under the circumstances.

How many games did he have with 30+ carries?

He's a tough guy for someone his size and I'm really confused over these claims that he lacks heart and determination.

If this "trade Portis" talk is going to last all offseason I think I just might shoot myself.

Matty, you better get that gun ready LOL
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:09 PM   #25
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,219
One good game by a backup and all of a sudden we should deal away a 23 year old RB with two 1500+ yard seasons and one 1300 yard season.

What a joke.
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:19 PM   #26
Special Teams
 
djdunick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Age: 52
Posts: 141
Remember fellas/ladies that we gave up a ton to get him and he hasn't 'saved' the franchise. We got ripped on the deal for sure. A cover corner is much harder to come by then a quality runner. Every year Denver produces a runner that gets a ton of yards.

What I saw yesterday is the type of running that I'ld expect from a Gibbs team.
djdunick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:25 PM   #27
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by djdunick
Remember fellas/ladies that we gave up a ton to get him and he hasn't 'saved' the franchise. We got ripped on the deal for sure. A cover corner is much harder to come by then a quality runner. Every year Denver produces a runner that gets a ton of yards.

What I saw yesterday is the type of running that I'ld expect from a Gibbs team.

I didn't know he was supposed to "save" our franchise. I thought Gibbs was supposed to do that.

What I saw yesterday was our backup running back going up against one of the worst defenses in the entire league.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:37 PM   #28
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by djdunick
Remember fellas/ladies that we gave up a ton to get him and he hasn't 'saved' the franchise. We got ripped on the deal for sure. A cover corner is much harder to come by then a quality runner. Every year Denver produces a runner that gets a ton of yards.

What I saw yesterday is the type of running that I'ld expect from a Gibbs team.
I'm not sure how we "got ripped" on that deal. With our not-up-to Bailey-standards CB's, we had the number three defense in the league, number one in the conference. As a team we got six more INT's than Denver. And that stiff we picked up got 1300 yards, despite taking the last game off.

You can argue that Portis didn't live up to billing. I think the entire offense was a disappointment, not just #26.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:54 PM   #29
Special Teams
 
djdunick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Age: 52
Posts: 141
Brudleee,

Yes indeed the entire offense was a disappointment. A straight trade and I wouldn't think we got ripped but we also gave up a draft pick. Having to change blocking schemes and the like to fit him makes me believe that Portis really doesn't fit the Gibbs style offense
djdunick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 02:55 PM   #30
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
DJ, I believe Gibbs knows that. He's going to make adjustments in the offseason and next year you'll see why alot of us feel like Portis is a great fit.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30068 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25