![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #61 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,614
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Quote:
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #62 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,885
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Aren't all fumbles loose?
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
| | |
| | #63 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,366
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Quote:
But who would thought just one year ago, we'd be talking about Rex Grossman being better than Donovan McNabb. What a difference a year makes. | |
| | |
| | #64 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,366
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Ruhskins, I'd add Kurt Warner and Trent Green to the listsof modern day QBs who have excelled in different systems. |
| | |
| | #65 | |
| JUST LIVIN ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: houston,tx Age: 51
Posts: 3,018
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Quote:
__________________ Ho Lee Chit | |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Reid is good with QBs, but he doesn't actually go out there and play the game. Part of being good with QBs is showing the ability to pick the right ones. You can't be good at coaching up a position with no aptitude for finding the right guys. McNabb was always overrated nationally, and the trade for him was a total disaster even at the time it was made, but overrated and not useful are two different things. Let's try not to totally re-write history here. McNabb became part of a very good system. He wasn't just there, he became an integral part of what they did. They didn't consistently throw 50 times a game with someone they were trying to hide. They're a completely different offense now, and ditching McNabb was necessary to reach their offensive potential, but that doesn't make Donovan chopped liver. He was a very unique player for the passing era he played in. But that era is over.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #67 |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? I would also give Reid credit for the incredible prescience to know when to stick a fork in a guy. McNabb's done. |
| | |
| | #68 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 1,719
| Re: McNabb, case study-coaching or talent at qb? Yes I agree with all post above. McNabb is done and I think we saw signs of it last season but common sense told us to see if he could work through it. I don't believe he will stay with Minnesota next year as a backup, like Matty said, Donovan might have lost the passion for the game, that makes it hard for a guy to stick around, not like other backups who still love football and are happy to help out in any capacity...
__________________ Time to nut up or shut up |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |