Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2011, 01:57 AM   #31
Playmaker
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,693
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

If we stall out in the redzone against Dallas, we will get slaughtered. We wont be able to keep up with their offense.
__________________
I need something to cheer about
Redskin Fan since '88
Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-19-2011, 01:58 AM   #32
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 27
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Cofield was one on one with Sendlein a lot in the first half in pass rush, and never really made an impact.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 02:00 AM   #33
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,458
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

When I looked at the stat sheet, Cofield was the only Dlineman with a tackle. Also, I think time of possession was somewhat of a factor. We nearly doubled their TOP.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 02:00 AM   #34
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,769
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Smackdown on Haslett. I think our defensive scheme was lackluster in the 2nd half. Kolb had a terrible 1st half and our secondary played relatively well early in the game. We should have come out (defensively) in the 3rd quarter expecting them to try to pound the pigskin w/ Wells, as they did. We should have put more guys in the box and not let them get anything going. Something is up w/ the right side defensively as most of the big gains on the ground seem to go there. Orakpo struggling in run defense/containment? Doughty? Hard for me to say.

Also within the defense Cofield looked very average today i.e. no impact out there. Why didn't Nield get more action today?
I think in the second half, the Cards took advantage of our banged up secondary to run the ball. They came out several times in the spread, and given the status of the secondary, we didn't pressure much and defended the pass trying to contain Fitz. Of course, they ran the ball very well against our spread defense. If Wilson doesn't get hurt, we probably do a better job against the run.

Although NTs are not supposed to be flashy on a 3-4, I do agree with you that Cofield has looked very average. I'd be curious to see what the folks that review the games can say about his play. I just hated seeing getting manhandled by the Giants' rookie center last week.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried - Agianst

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 02:24 AM   #35
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,750
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
What's up with these scab threads? Boo
Well I approached Smoot and Scud week after week and said "dudes you got put an R or a TM at the end of your thread title." And they were like "dude no way" and I was like "but DUDE you got to protect your brand."

Why do you think Coke sends hit squads to peoples houses that are ruining their business?
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 02:43 AM   #36
The Starter
 
Swarley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 26
Posts: 1,035
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I think in the second half, the Cards took advantage of our banged up secondary to run the ball. They came out several times in the spread, and given the status of the secondary, we didn't pressure much and defended the pass trying to contain Fitz. Of course, they ran the ball very well against our spread defense. If Wilson doesn't get hurt, we probably do a better job against the run.

I agree completely, sometimes you gotta give credit to the other teams play caller.
__________________
doing it all in the spirit of the salary cap!
Swarley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 02:50 AM   #37
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 27
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

If it felt like Cofield did little in this game, thats partially because he didn't play a whole lot.

But Arizona could pass as much as they wanted as long as they could block him one on one.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 02:56 AM   #38
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 27
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Smackdown on Haslett. I think our defensive scheme was lackluster in the 2nd half. Kolb had a terrible 1st half and our secondary played relatively well early in the game. We should have come out (defensively) in the 3rd quarter expecting them to try to pound the pigskin w/ Wells, as they did. We should have put more guys in the box and not let them get anything going. Something is up w/ the right side defensively as most of the big gains on the ground seem to go there. Orakpo struggling in run defense/containment? Doughty? Hard for me to say.
Arizona ran 3 times in the first half, so if Haslett was going to think they would come out and try to shove it down our throats, he would have been totally guessing. I don't like it when halftime adjustments are total guesses in the dark.

The truth, in my opinion, is because the onus was on the Cardinals offense to change its approach, the Redskins needed to have more than a 3 point lead at half and kicking off based on the way they dominated. It's too easy to go in at half and find one thing about the defense you can attack.

The Cardinals did win the halftime adjustments, but that's to be expected when the Redskins were utterly schematically dominant in the first half. The only place to go for the Cards coaches was up, despite the score.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 03:13 AM   #39
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 27
Posts: 15,994
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Hightower isn't as good in pass protection as we've all been lead to believe. He's adequate at best, but he doesn't exactly go and stick people.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 06:59 AM   #40
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Tsk, tsk.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 07:47 AM   #41
Playmaker
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 2,734
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44ever View Post
WAPOW!!!!

Welcome to DC.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here.

HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14.
CrustyRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 08:45 AM   #42
Camp Scrub
 
jrsz24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 45
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucket View Post
If we stall out in the redzone against Dallas, we will get slaughtered. We wont be able to keep up with their offense.
What offense? Romo hurt, Jones hurt, and Austin out. Bryant also hurt. We should be able to beat them. F Dallas.
jrsz24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 08:51 AM   #43
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 85,869
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin View Post
Welcome to DC.
man, that's a shot, he got decked by Fletcher too on that long bomb to Fitz.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 09:49 AM   #44
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,769
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
If it felt like Cofield did little in this game, thats partially because he didn't play a whole lot.

But Arizona could pass as much as they wanted as long as they could block him one on one.
This is concerning me a little bit because I was never a believer in Cofield as our NT. I think he'd be a helluva DE, but not a NT. I hope he improves, because his job is to take on two blockers and allow our LBs to go for the kill. I think his performance has been disguised a bit by Haslett's scheming and the great pass rush created by Rak and Kerrigan.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried - Agianst

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 10:02 AM   #45
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
This is concerning me a little bit because I was never a believer in Cofield as our NT. I think he'd be a helluva DE, but not a NT. I hope he improves, because his job is to take on two blockers and allow our LBs to go for the kill. I think his performance has been disguised a bit by Haslett's scheming and the great pass rush created by Rak and Kerrigan.
Good assessment here RUh.

Personally I think we are ok with Cofield as long as he steadly improves but once again, were playing NT unnaturally.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28323 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25