Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Who is it?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2005, 05:39 PM   #16
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Do we have to think about the cap. What kind of situation are we in with that? How much can we spend or really allow to spend? I would like to keep him And I am sure you do to . But the cap is what might hurt us here this year or in the next few years.
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-26-2005, 05:41 PM   #17
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,870
Watch it turn out to be someone like Ethan Albright. LOL

not that I don't want to keep EA
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 05:44 PM   #18
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
thats just wrong
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 05:53 PM   #19
Jay Gruden fan

 
CrazyCanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown
Would gibbs of used the term re-sign rather than re-negotiat if he was talking about Samuels. I think it is smoot because of his wording.
Ya I was thinking that too. Well maybe the thinking is - if Samuels doesn't restrucutre then he's gone - so in that light it could be viewed as a "re-signing".
CrazyCanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 05:57 PM   #20
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=5622

Offensive lineman Ben Nowland, offensive lineman-tight end Dan Goodspeed, defensive back Roosevelt Williams and linebacker Joe Tuipala were officially added to the roster this week.
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 06:20 PM   #21
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown
Would gibbs of used the term re-sign rather than re-negotiat if he was talking about Samuels. I think it is smoot because of his wording.
I don't think those are Gibbs words so much as they are the Washington Post's. And I ain't no English major but wouldn't renegotiating be the process of getting the new contract done whereas re-signing is actually putting pen to paper?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 08:49 PM   #22
Special Teams
 
BIGREDSKINFAN63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bassett-va
Age: 51
Posts: 289
the guys on fox radio really gave him a lot of shit over all this.i think samuels is gone,i think they'll keep smoot.
__________________
"7 days without the redskins, makes one weak!!!"
BIGREDSKINFAN63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 08:59 PM   #23
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,584
I'd take that... Samuels have have been above average, but Smoot is a team leader AND above average.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 11:44 PM   #24
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 34
Posts: 3,736
i haven't been able to read all the posts lately but does anyone think he might have been referring to players more under the radar (not to mention players who will more cap-friendly) like peirce, marshall, or thrash? Samuels will either renegotiate or will be getting the door hitting him on the ass on the way out. plus how much longer is ramsey signed until?
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 12:28 AM   #25
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,442
like i have said earlier, gibbs has stated that keeping samuels is a must, i read that in the daily press. he will be here next year i am sure
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 01:12 AM   #26
Camp Scrub
 
DCopper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 59
It's gotta be Samuels. Although re-signing Smoot is a priority, Smoot is the least likely of the Skins' big free agents to stick around. The reason is because Gibbs and Snyder both know that we can get something good in return for Smoot should he choose to not re-sign here. We will franchise him and deal him for high draft choice(s) or possibly some veterans that can come in and make an immediate impact. Although Samuels and Pierce could potentially be traded as well, they would not garner the interest that Smoot would on the trade market. Therefore, if there is one person who is not coming back to the Skins next year, it's Smoot.

I desperately want Smoot to stick around, but I won't be overly worried should he leave. Gibbs, Williams and Snyder know the importance of having good corners in this defensive system, so if Smoot leaves, I am confident that Snyder will whip out the checkbook and find someone comparable to replace him.

I have loved the offseason since Snyder took over. Danny Boy always seems to keep us on our toes, and you never quite know what he's gonna do. Unfortunately, for the past decade, the offseason has been by far the most exciting time to be a Skins fan. Let's just hope that some of this offseason excitement turns into Ws next year.
DCopper04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 11:03 AM   #27
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,224
I'm saying Smoot. I have a feeling that the Pierce/Samuels/Wynn renegotiations will go fairly smoothly. I think he realizes they need to sign Smoot.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 11:05 AM   #28
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
"""I have loved the offseason since Snyder took over. Danny Boy always seems to keep us on our toes, and you never quite know what he's gonna do. Unfortunately, for the past decade, the offseason has been by far the most exciting time to be a Skins fan. Let's just hope that some of this offseason excitement turns into Ws next year."""

Oh how true that statement is.

Yup I would love to see smoot stay. But now that I think about it If he goes somewhere. This is just a thought but what if we trade Smoot to the vicks for Moss.. They do need dfence overthere. They might be just desprit enough to do the trade it could cost us a sec round in the draft. but who knows.
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 11:08 AM   #29
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,224
Smoot and a 2nd rounder (of which we don't have right now?) The Vikes would laugh at that deal. Perhaps the most explosive offensive player when healthy for an above average corner and a 2nd rounder? Doubt that. They'd want our #9 for sure. If we lose Smoot, I'd like to get at least a 2nd for him, and use our first on a CB. Rolle or the guy from Auburn!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 11:47 AM   #30
Camp Scrub
 
Taylor Rules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8
Daseal, you are 100% on the money. The guy to get if we draft a corner is without question Carlos Rogers.
Taylor Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30314 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25