Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Offence or Defence

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2005, 04:53 PM   #1
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Exclamation Offence or Defence

So what should it be this year offence or defence this year that we need to work on. Since our D was #3 I think that we need to work on offence. How bout it?
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-26-2005, 06:18 PM   #2
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 52
Posts: 795
Defense

Add a DE and a another solid corner. We want to be #1
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 06:53 PM   #3
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
the o needs the most "work" , the d just needs to add a few players ( de & cb if smoot leaves )
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2005, 07:35 PM   #4
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,686
I think both. The defense has improvement to make, because the fans AND the team aren't going to be satisfied until they are #1. I think the offense shares the same mentality. If we got anything, we got team spirit, yeah boy.

Just a couple pickups here and there and we'll be doing fine on both sides of the ball.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 12:33 AM   #5
Camp Scrub
 
DCopper04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 59
Offensive improvement is clearly the bigger need. But I don't think that necessarily means that we need to go out and break the bank in typical Snyder-fashion to get some offensive playmakers. I truly believe that the biggest problem with the offense this year (aside form Brunell) was the playcalling. I think that at the beginning of the year, Gibbs was looking to replicate the success he had in the past running the football, and he was hesitant to back off of that stance when things weren't working. I think he was working hard to validate the trade and subsequent blockbuster extension given to Portis, and he also wanted to prove that bringing in Brunell was the right move. Now that we are past that phase, I think Gibbs and Breaux will be more open to taking shots downfield and fixing the offensive problems that we experienced this past year.
DCopper04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 01:10 AM   #6
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 51
Posts: 3,097
Offensive line [center] and a big fast reciever, this will keep our defense off the field and fresh and propel them into the #1 D in the league.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 09:54 AM   #7
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCopper04
Offensive improvement is clearly the bigger need. But I don't think that necessarily means that we need to go out and break the bank in typical Snyder-fashion to get some offensive playmakers. I truly believe that the biggest problem with the offense this year (aside form Brunell) was the playcalling. I think that at the beginning of the year, Gibbs was looking to replicate the success he had in the past running the football, and he was hesitant to back off of that stance when things weren't working. I think he was working hard to validate the trade and subsequent blockbuster extension given to Portis, and he also wanted to prove that bringing in Brunell was the right move. Now that we are past that phase, I think Gibbs and Breaux will be more open to taking shots downfield and fixing the offensive problems that we experienced this past year.
Now this I believe. Cause Gibbs will learn from his mistake, and change them. But As for the D I think that they did great all year long.

But the O line needs much improvement and I think that will be the case when the draft comes around. When it does I think that we will get a good O lineman. If we don't then I will be the first to say I was wrong.
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:09 AM   #8
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 8,271
A better O will lead to a better D. Keep them off the field!

Go for O! Center, Blocking TE, WR. Other than that. Leave it alone. Add a DE on defense, besides that, just replace anything we lose!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:11 AM   #9
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Ok then if we lose Smoot who will take his place? That is as good or better then him.
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:22 AM   #10
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 86,112
The offense clearly needs more attention this offseason.
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:27 AM   #11
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Well Matty thats what I hope for. We need a good work over. Or is it that the offence is just scared of getting another coach. Shoot just to change the scheem again?
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:43 AM   #12
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 86,112
I think the offense will be much improved next year.

Ramsey will be much more comfortable, the offensive line should be improved, everyone will have a year in the system under their belts, the play calling will likely be more aggressive, etc.

I'd be shocked if we don't see the offense drastically improved in '05.
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:45 AM   #13
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Is that with new players on the line?
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:54 AM   #14
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 8,271
Matty, I'll be shocked if we get past the 15th ranked O in the nfl. If we can get at least in the teens, we'll be playoff bound as long as our defense gives a similar performance than they did this year!
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 11:01 AM   #15
Camp Scrub
 
rdsknfn2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 40
Posts: 72
Daseal,
I think the defence will do better next year. They might be #1 if the offence is better and keep the defence off the field for a little bit. But the D was in good shape.
rdsknfn2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26050 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25