The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   The Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Redskins Locker Room


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2012, 12:47 PM   #1351
Swearinger

 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyCanuck View Post
We wouldn't have to pay that $920K RB though. We'd sign him to a brand new contract.
Yeah I know I was just saying that RB is a lot for a 3rd stringer- prob a big factor in being close to cutting him.
__________________
Insert witty signature here
GMScud is offline  

Advertisements
Old 02-22-2012, 01:59 PM   #1352
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
He doesn't need to throw, by all account he probably shouldn't throw because he has nothing to gain.
But, a lot of people, myself included would gain a ton of respect for him if he does throw.

It would be great if all the top prospects started throwing at the combine.
I hope,like Cam Newton, all top QB prospects decide to throw from now on.
__________________
No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole

Last edited by 30gut; 02-22-2012 at 02:03 PM.
30gut is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:02 PM   #1353
Pro Bowl
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I'm not a big fan but picking him up for nothing seems like a no-brainer
I agree. I remember a lot of fans liking him and thinking he would turn out pretty good. I wonder what happened? was it the coaching change? or the system. I wouldn't mind kicking the tires. He can't be any worse then Crompton.... can he?
SBXVII is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:08 PM   #1354
Pro Bowl
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
He doesn't need to throw, by all account he probably shouldn't throw because he has nothing to gain.
But, a lot of people, myself included would gain a ton of respect for him if he does throw.

It would be great if all the top prospects started throwing at the combine.
I hope,like Cam Newton, all top QB prospects decide to throw from now on.
The only negative I can see is if he's not ready or has not been working out, which I doubt is the problem. The other negative is him throwing to WR's he's not worked with and could make him look bad.

But does it really matter? If the Colts are set on taking Luck then it shouldn't matter if he sucks it up or if he comes out blazing. The Colts would be better served to tell him not to run the 40 so he doesn't hurt his foot or knee or hammie.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:26 PM   #1355
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
If the Vikings do land RGIII would Redskins fans be interested in modest trade for Ponder?
I would prefer Ponder to Sam Bradford. I thought Ponder displayed a better arm last year (maybe because of indoor home games?) than he did in college. He made all the throws. His problem was that he misread a lot of coverages as a rookie. Bradford's problems are more about physical limitation.
__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:30 PM   #1356
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I would prefer Ponder to Sam Bradford. I thought Ponder displayed a better arm last year (maybe because of indoor home games?) than he did in college. He made all the throws. His problem was that he misread a lot of coverages as a rookie. Bradford's problems are more about physical limitation.
Really? I never really thought arm strength was Bradford's issue. Then again, I never really watched the Rams beyond the one Redskins game...
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:36 PM   #1357
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
Really? I never really thought arm strength was Bradford's issue. Then again, I never really watched the Rams beyond the one Redskins game...
It's not arm strength that's the issue. It's not accuracy that's the issue. It's that the ball very often dives or sails on him when he's forced to quickly reset, which was pretty much all year this year because the Rams OL was trash.

Bradford is plenty smart enough to get it, but he came into the league really smart, and he's struggled to overcome himself, not to mention his own offense.

Ponder is far from a finished product, but he makes plays. Once he cuts the mistakes out, I think he'll be a very good pro starter. Ponder's problem is he's got to figure out a way to survive as a starter in this league even though the position prototype is shifting away from people who look like him. Bradford looks the part, but his obvious limitations always have me scratching my head as to how he got picked first overall ahead of Suh. Bradford needed a really strong offensive structure and system to be effective, and instead he got: the Rams.
__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 03:04 PM   #1358
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
...The other negative is him throwing to WR's he's not worked with and could make him look bad.
The only other negative you can think of 'looking bad' would be a rather large negative.
And that is the exact reason why most top QB prospects don't throw at the combine if they can get away with it and Luck certainly could.

If Luck chooses to compete in the throwing sessions at the combine he takes on the needless risk of being upstaged; the risk of not throwing or looking like the best QB prospect on the field.

Keep in mind I'm not saying the above will happen.
I'm just pointing out the chief 'negative' if Luck chooses to compete at the combine when he can wait til his pro-day.
Now, if Luck does choose to compete it will say a lot about his personality and competitive spirit; it will be ballsy.

I hope the kid goes out there and just grips it and rips it! let the cards fall where they may.
Go out there and show you've got nothing to hide.
Compete shoulder to shoulder with the other QB prospects.
It will continue a great precedent started by Cam Newton.
__________________
No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole

Last edited by 30gut; 02-22-2012 at 03:14 PM.
30gut is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 03:15 PM   #1359
Pro Bowl
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Uh-Oh... spaghetti-O's.

Report: Mike Shanahan "Loves Quarterback Brandon Weeden" - Hogs Haven

Now I know some of you are going to be un-happy, but .....c'est la vie.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 03:27 PM   #1360
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Uh-Oh... spaghetti-O's.

Report: Mike Shanahan "Loves Quarterback Brandon Weeden" - Hogs Haven

Now I know some of you are going to be un-happy, but .....c'est la vie.
I get the sense that this is a smoke screen (as the picture indicates).
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 03:41 PM   #1361
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 40
Posts: 72,673
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I'd have no problem with Weeden. But at this point anything is possible.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:13 PM   #1362
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 28
Posts: 3,850
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

if i'm being honest with myself, if we draft a qb, i'm going to focus on his pros and forget his flaws in order to convince myself that he will lead us to the top shelf
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:14 PM   #1363
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Of all the rookie quarterbacks, Weeden is by far the one most likely to be drafted by the Redskins.

I don't think he's their first choice though, but if choices one and two are off the board at 6th overall, then sure.
__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:16 PM   #1364
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

If we draft Brandon Weeden 6th overall, I might just hang myself.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:16 PM   #1365
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 40
Posts: 72,673
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Of all the rookie quarterbacks, Weeden is by far the one most likely to be drafted by the Redskins.

I don't think he's their first choice though, but if choices one and two are off the board at 6th overall, then sure.
Definitely not, but he's part of the overall thought process no doubt
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.55911 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24