![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,910
| Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Some very interesting thoughts here: Proposed rule changes for 2012 | ProFootballTalk 1) Playoff OT rules now Regular season as well 2) several defensive player type protections 3) roster exemption for a concussed player 4) one IR could be designated to come back in season and more. Thoughts? |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,001
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes I like the overtime rule change, all fumble plays being instantly reviewed, the IR rule change, etc.... I don't necessarily have a big issue with any of them.
__________________ Not the same Skinsguy that posts on ES. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Pending explanation on #2, I like the rule changes for once. I hope #2 doesn't hamper zone-blocking teams.
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,001
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Making the crackback blocks illegal if the defensive player is hit in the head/neck area.
__________________ Not the same Skinsguy that posts on ES. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| MVP Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,179
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Anybody wanna copy/paste the story? I can't read the link. As far as the OP goes, I like all the proposed changes, although I say that knowing how vague #2 is in the OP. If the crackback rule hurt what we do on offense, I'd tell them to adjust, because that same rule would prevent other offenses from potentially injuring our defensive players some day. Imagine how pissed we'd be if some player took out Kerrigan or Orakpo on a crackback hit and it cost them their season, yet we didn't even get so much as a penalty. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,008
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes I wish they would bring back celebrations and return the kickoff to the 30
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes If the blocking is done right there should be not issue. Plus there already is a rule in place... no chop blocking (cutting a guys legs out from underneith while he's engaged by another player. Those kinds of rules. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Maybe they could add any face mask is a penalty. It's one thing to stiff arm a defensemen by using his body it's another to grab the CB's facemask and try to hold him off. If the defense can't do it neither should the offense. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,910
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| MVP Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,179
| Thanks for doing that CR. From reading it I don't have a problem wih any of those rule changes, although I don't think all of them will pass. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes 3 4 and turnover review are good.. now let us get rid of the archaic inactive for gameday rule
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes I wish they'd make strangling Orakpo a penalty.
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 42
Posts: 4,529
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes I never understood the point of having a player on IR being done for the season. Why don't they have an injury policy more like MLB with a 30-60-90-120 day injury list. That allows players hurt in preseason to contribute down the stretch. I guess stashing could be an issue but the way its done now is kinda dumb.
__________________ No Pressure-No Diamonds! Go Catch Your Dreams! |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,001
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Quote:
__________________ Not the same Skinsguy that posts on ES. | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,910
| Re: Proposed New Rule/Bylaw changes Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |