![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #136 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,203
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? We do? Has this been confirmed somewhere? |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #137 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,036
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? |
| | |
| | #138 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
RG3 Report | Washington Examiner
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole | |
| | |
| | #139 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole | |
| | |
| | #140 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
Chirs Russell talking about Griffin running option http://www.stationcaster.com/player_...c=427&f=585021 RG3: playbook turning into a second language :24s mark vid of Griff practicing zone read QB keep
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole Last edited by 30gut; 06-22-2012 at 10:29 AM. | |
| | |
| | #141 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,036
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? A standard NFL defense should be able to stop the old option play. If the Redskins incorporate this into their offense, they should use it sparingly. Griffin III is a very athletically gifted QB, but most of his runs should be made off schedule during pass plays and not designed for him to just keep the ball and outrun the defense. |
| | |
| | #142 | |||
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
Because surely, I'm not nor do I think anyone in this thread has suggested running the "old option play". And when if comes to option concepts the Panthers embarrassed our defense and plenty of other defenses by using different option concepts last year. Tebow, a QB that doesn't even throw the ball very well, was able to take a 1-4 team and amass a 7-4 record and a playoff win by using option concepts almost exclusively as the basis for their offense. But, any play or concept can be "stopped" but not without leaving the defense vulnerable somewhere else e.g. if a defense commits to stopping the the zone-read QB keep and the zone-read RB keep then they leave themselves vulenrable against playaction passing: Option concepts are sound football concepts tried and true over a long period of time. Its not a gimmick play, at its core option concepts that include the QB as a run threat create a numerical advantage over the defense. The question is how much contact is a team willing to expose they're QB to and how much contact can the QB handle and how smart is the QB about protecting themself? Quote:
Quote:
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole Last edited by 30gut; 06-23-2012 at 04:18 AM. | |||
| | |
| | #143 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,036
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? |
| | |
| | #144 | |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,951
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
You can incorporate running plays or run/pass options for Griffin (I hope we are) but that is different from a wildcat.
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. | |
| | |
| | #145 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8,405
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
This is NOT any wildcat formation. This IS a wildcat formation.
__________________ "So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty | |
| | |
| | #146 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,036
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #147 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? Quote:
The option is a football concept that is applied in various formations and systems. Those systems are termed "option" because the execution of the play is deteremined by the ballcarrier reading/keying* off a defender giving them the option* to either keep the ball or give the ball to another possible ball carrier. Usually the read/keyed defender is unblocked by design to give the offense a numerical advantage in blocking elsewhere. *(hence the term: read option ) Also, the wishbone is another formation/system that can be option but doesn't have to be, their are plenty of teams that use wishbone formation and don't option. So, I ask again, what are you refering to when you say option? I've been quite specific when I refer to option throughout this thread and like I've mentioned already in my previous post evidence on how/why option concepts are not as easily defended as you seem to think. Lets not speak in platitudes when we can have a real football X's and O's conversation and discuss in specifics. The aim for most of my threads is to have an honest to goodness football discussion.
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole Last edited by 30gut; 06-24-2012 at 10:47 AM. | |
| | |
| | #148 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,203
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? lol pretty much ends the conversation right here |
| | |
| | #149 |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? We can't possibly be worse with Rex riding the bench, even if we finish the season 2-14.
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! |
| | |
| | #150 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: los angeles, ca Age: 28
Posts: 3,857
| Re: A New Look Offense or the Same but Better? such as?
__________________ 7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81 |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |