![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,751
| Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 36
Posts: 7,799
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt glad the lawyered up, "rogue coach" approach didnt work. Personally think Micky Loomis should be fired.
__________________ Ready for the Draft. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| MVP Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,179
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Shocker. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Playmaker ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt In other shocking news, night will follow day once again when the sun goes down in the west...
__________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Playmaker ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Very often when a group of people are involved in some sort of underhanded behavior that involves joint actions by the members of the group - - in legalese, that is a conspiracy - - the group tends to come apart once an investigation begins. Members of the group begin to look out for self-interest and not group-interest. In this case, hanging all of this around Gregg Williams' neck was the "cut-and-run" strategy in the group. It did not work - obviously - but it did succeed in one aspect. It showed Gregg Williams just how much cover others in his profession would afford him when the chips were down. Now, if Williams ever wants to have his suspension lifted, he needs to cooperate with the NFL in other investigations. Translation: Williams needs to spill what he knows about what goes on/went on eslewhere.Sean Payton, Mickey Loomis and Joe Vitt gave Williams reason to look out for his self-interest only when Commish Goodell comes to talk to talk to him the next time.
__________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Washington DC Age: 26
Posts: 9,811
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Soooo. What's the Saint's record gonna look like this year?
__________________ Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I'm a chick, damnit. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Quote:
LOL. It's tough to tell to be honest. I feel that their offense will be pretty much run by Brees. Spags is new to the defense, and I am sure they are going to lose players, so that unit may take a hit. I'll be curious to see how the rest of the NFC South fares. I think the Panthers needed to make some improvements, but they haven't done much. The Falcons have the potential to improve and who knows how the Bucs are going to do with all of their new FA acquisitions.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,958
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Good to see Goodell gets to handle the initial judgement AND the appeals. No conflict of interest there.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 43
Posts: 2,978
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Does this mean they can focus on the Skins cap penalties NOW. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| The Starter Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,560
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Probably need to punish the Saints players first. Plus, I don't expect anything to get done regarding our cap penalty until the summer time. I'd assume the professor arbitrating our case won't do anything until classes are out. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Most Interesting Man in the World Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Chantilly, VA Age: 25
Posts: 8,557
| Would he do anything else? There had to be new and overwhelming evidence for him to change the suspensions. And even if there was that would've meant they previously lied to goodell, the reason why they were punished in the first place. Was never going to change his mind. They knew this and appealed as a PR move.
__________________ Vacancy |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,958
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Quote:
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Age: 44
Posts: 1,949
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Payton will sneak in to the Saints training camp as a construction worker. There is construction going on at the camp now. so he could possibly slip in... i was there today and just basically had my run of the place BTW I was wearing my Script R Redskins hat along with a Redskins shirt.. so not to stand out that much.. LOL
__________________ Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,030
| Re: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt Sean Payton knew Goddell wasn't going to overturn his initial decision. His infraction was much to serious. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |