Grade the Redskins Moves So Far

skinsfan69 · 04-11-2012, 01:39 PM

I say around a D. Not impressed w/ the off season and it looks as if the front office has grown desperate. Adding Garcon was a solid move, he's a good player, but I prefer that we bolster RT and guard before adding wr's...since we already have wr's on the roster that haven't been given a fair shot. Disapprove of signing Morgan. That move was just overkill. His best year is 52 catches and 3 td's. The DB moves are all just for the purpose of adding bodies. None of these guys are 16 game starters. Although I love the kid, I think the price for RG3 was just too steep. Hopefully we can find some gems in the draft.

skinsfan69 · 04-11-2012, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

We have to keep in perspective how Goodell severely handicapped our offseason with the bogus cap penalty just hours before FA started. We didn't have all of our expected cap space.

I'll take B because of the RGIII pick-up and loading up on quality WRs to support him. We FINALLY have a franchise QB. "Strong, better than expected" perfectly describes what we did with the cap situation we were unfairly thrown into.

What's keeping it from being an A is not signing London Fletcher. We also need a new starting RT...but we do have the draft to address that position along with the secondary. Jammal Brown is very good when healthy, but that's the problem, he needs to stay healthy.

We're not going to truly know if RG3 is a franchise QB until he gets on the field. I think he's got a great shot at it but a lot of that depends on what's around him. Not just players but front office goes with that. If Shanahan goes 3-5 wins next year will Snyder be patient? The worse thing that can happen to this kid is what happened to Jason Campbell. He needs stability aka..Brady, Ben, both Manning's, Rivers, Brees...

Mattyk · 04-11-2012, 02:27 PM

Grading the moves now is like giving someone a grade before they even take a test. I like the moves so far, but we still have the draft and plenty of more roster shaping ahead.

Chico23231 · 04-11-2012, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I say around a D. Not impressed w/ the off season and it looks as if the front office has grown desperate. Adding Garcon was a solid move, he's a good player, but I prefer that we bolster RT and guard before adding wr's...since we already have wr's on the roster that haven't been given a fair shot. Disapprove of signing Morgan. That move was just overkill. His best year is 52 catches and 3 td's. The DB moves are all just for the purpose of adding bodies. None of these guys are 16 game starters. Although I love the kid, I think the price for RG3 was just too steep. Hopefully we can find some gems in the draft.

I think if it was a 4, 5 year 20+ million dollar deal i might agree, but his contract is really no risk. 2 year deal where we get to find out if he can become a stronger player. Shanny reallllly wanted this guy and there was a lot of interest from other teams. I think he could be an asset.

SkinsGuru · 04-11-2012, 03:59 PM

i give the FO an A . . . not for the final product, but the biggest need the Skins have is QB . . . and they did everything they had to do to move up and select either RGIII or Luck . . . thats really makes this offseason and A by itself as if they turn out to be the player everyone thinks they can the Skins will be a much better team for the next decade and a half . . . everything else is just butter . . .

Mattyk · 04-11-2012, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico23231

I think if it was a 4, 5 year 20+ million dollar deal i might agree, but his contract is really no risk. 2 year deal where we get to find out if he can become a stronger player. Shanny reallllly wanted this guy and there was a lot of interest from other teams. I think he could be an asset.

I can see people not liking Garcon's contract, but Morgan was a low risk signing.

RedskinRat · 04-11-2012, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Grading the moves now is like giving someone a grade before they even take a test. I like the moves so far, but we still have the draft and plenty of more roster shaping ahead.

Agreed.

I'd like to have seen an additional option. 'Let's see what results we get this season in the W/L columns'.

The Goat · 04-11-2012, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I can see people not liking Garcon's contract, but Morgan was a low risk signing.

My thoughts exactly. Garcon needs to make a big, immediate impact to justify the contract. I have no problem w/ Morgan on the other hand.

skinsfaninok · 04-11-2012, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

My thoughts exactly. Garcon needs to make a big, immediate impact to justify the contract. I have no problem w/ Morgan on the other hand.

He will , fast and a very good route runner.

The Goat · 04-11-2012, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

He will , fast and a very good route runner.

...also (mostly) inconsistent. He had a handful of big games last year otherwise pretty average. If Garcon really produces at the level of his contract then I'm annoyed w/ the opportunity cost but happy to have a younger WR. If Garcon doesn't produce it will be yet another major flub by this FO.

PilarVIRUS · 04-11-2012, 06:15 PM

C-

No Flect, I don't need to explain this.

Lotus · 04-11-2012, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

...also (mostly) inconsistent. He had a handful of big games last year otherwise pretty average. If Garcon really produces at the level of his contract then I'm annoyed w/ the opportunity cost but happy to have a younger WR. If Garcon doesn't produce it will be yet another major flub by this FO.

It's hard to tell if his down games were because of Garcon or because of the immortal Curtis Painter.

VegasSkinsFan · 04-11-2012, 06:31 PM

Really depends on what the outcome of arbitration is. If we are able to recoup cap space then I'm in love. If we have no first round pick coupled with no cap space next offseason I'm going to be less than thrilled.

30gut · 04-11-2012, 07:31 PM

They made some good moves with questionable compensation.
They've also made some ouright questionable signings.
They haven't upgraded the OL.

Thus far I would grade FA a C- with a curve thrown in fueled by Griffin based homerism.

GTripp0012 · 04-11-2012, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lotus

It's hard to tell if his down games were because of Garcon or because of the immortal Curtis Painter.

Garcon had more than a fair share of tough days with Manning has his quarterback. Then again, he didn't have the luxury to be brought in gradually like Reggie Wayne did. Marvin Harrison's career ended pretty abruptly.

View Poll Results: Grade the Redskins 2012 Off-Season Moves
A (All I hoped for and more)	27	16.67%
B (Strong, better than expected)	86	53.09%
C (Pretty ordinary)	45	27.78%
F (I hate life)	4	2.47%
Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll

04-11-2012, 01:39 PM	#46
skinsfan69 Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA. Posts: 8,104	Re: Grade the Redskins Moves So Far I say around a D. Not impressed w/ the off season and it looks as if the front office has grown desperate. Adding Garcon was a solid move, he's a good player, but I prefer that we bolster RT and guard before adding wr's...since we already have wr's on the roster that haven't been given a fair shot. Disapprove of signing Morgan. That move was just overkill. His best year is 52 catches and 3 td's. The DB moves are all just for the purpose of adding bodies. None of these guys are 16 game starters. Although I love the kid, I think the price for RG3 was just too steep. Hopefully we can find some gems in the draft.

04-11-2012, 02:27 PM	#48
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,673	Re: Grade the Redskins Moves So Far Grading the moves now is like giving someone a grade before they even take a test. I like the moves so far, but we still have the draft and plenty of more roster shaping ahead. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

04-11-2012, 03:59 PM	#50
SkinsGuru Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 75	Re: Grade the Redskins Moves So Far i give the FO an A . . . not for the final product, but the biggest need the Skins have is QB . . . and they did everything they had to do to move up and select either RGIII or Luck . . . thats really makes this offseason and A by itself as if they turn out to be the player everyone thinks they can the Skins will be a much better team for the next decade and a half . . . everything else is just butter . . .

04-11-2012, 06:15 PM	#56
PilarVIRUS Camp Scrub Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 10	Re: Grade the Redskins Moves So Far C- No Flect, I don't need to explain this.

04-11-2012, 06:31 PM	#58
VegasSkinsFan Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 533	Really depends on what the outcome of arbitration is. If we are able to recoup cap space then I'm in love. If we have no first round pick coupled with no cap space next offseason I'm going to be less than thrilled.

04-11-2012, 07:31 PM	#59
30gut The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 2,075	Re: Grade the Redskins Moves So Far They made some good moves with questionable compensation. They've also made some ouright questionable signings. They haven't upgraded the OL. Thus far I would grade FA a C- with a curve thrown in fueled by Griffin based homerism. __________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Grade the Redskins Moves So Far

Redskins Locker Room